Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral and morphological adaptations of the coccinellid,Platynaspis luteorubra for exploiting ant-attended resources (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Larvae of the coccinellidPlatynaspis luteorubra were found significantly more often in ant-attended aphid colonies than in unattended colonies. The larva ofP. luteorubra are protected against detection by the antLasius niger by their unusual shape, by inconspicuous movements, and presumably by chemical camouflage. Pupae were attacked byL. niger but protected by their dense hair cover. Adults were also attacked and responded either by fleeing or by pressing their body tightly against the plant surface. Fourth-instar larvae foraging in ant-attended aphid colonies had a higher success rate in capturing large prey items and benefitted from this by higher adult weights. Larval parasitism was higher in individuals feeding in unattended than in ant-attended colonies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addicott, J. H. (1979). A multispecies aphid-ant association: Density dependence and species-specific effects.Can. J. Zool. 57 558–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attygalle, A. B., McCormick, K. D., Blankespoor, C. L., Eisner, T., and Meinwald, J. (1993). Azamacrolides: A family of alkaloids from the pupal defense secretion of a ladybird beetle (Epilachna varivestis).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 5204–5208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, C. J. (1962). Effect of the ant,Lasius niger, on insects preying on small populations ofAphis fabae Scop. on bean plants.Ann. Appl. Biol. 50 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, G. A. (1973). Effect ofFormica obsuripes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on the predatorprey relationship betweenHyperaspis congressis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) andToumeyella numismaticum (Homoptera: Coccidae).Can. Entomol. 105 1113–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, C. (1984). Differential benefits from ant-attendance to two species of Homoptera on New York ironweed.J. Anim. Ecol. 53 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. (1987). Interactions involving plants, homoptera, and ants.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, C. R., and Janzen, D. H. (1973). Ecology of foraging by ants.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4 231–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. C., and Dixon, A. F. G. (1982). Habitat quality and the foraging behaviour of coccinellid larvae.J. Anim. Ecol. 51 865–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson, P. (1978). Predator-prey theory and variability.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9 323–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudjoe, A. R., Neuenschwander, P., and Copland, M. J. W. (1993). Interference by ants in biological control of the cassava mealybugPhenacoccus manihoti (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Ghana.Bull. Entomol. Res. 83 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. F. G. (1959). An experimental study of the searching behaviour of the predatory coccinellid beetleAdalia decempunctata (L.).J. Anim. Ecol. 28 259–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. F. G. (1985).Aphid Ecology, Blackie, Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, A. F. G., and Stewart, L. A. (1991). Size and foraging in ladybird beetles. In Polgár, L., Chambers, R. J., Dixon, A. F. G., and Hodek, I. (eds.),Behaviour and Impact of Aphidophaga, SPB Academic, The Hague, pp. 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Hicks, K., Eisner, M., and Robson, D. S. (1978). “Wolf-in-sheep's-clothing” strategy of a predaceous insect larva.Science 199 790–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, T., Goetz, M., Aneshansley, D., Fersting-Arnold, G., and Meinwald, J. (1986). Defensive alkaloid in blood of Mexican bean beetle (Epilachni varivestis).Experientia 42 204–207.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell, M. P., and May, R. (1974). Aggregation in predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability.J. Anim. Ecol. 43 567–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemptinne, J. L., and Dixon, A. F. G. (1991). Why ladybirds have generally been so ineffective in biological control? In Polgár, L., Chambers, R. J., Dixon, A. F. G., and I. Hodek (eds.),Behaviour and Impact of Aphidophaga, SPB Academic, The Hague, pp. 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodek, I. (1973).Biology of Coccinellidae, Academia, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990).The Ants, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, R. W., Akre, R. D., and Garnett, W. B. (1990). Chemical mimicry of an obligate predator of carpenter ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83 607–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, C., Majerus, M. E. N., and Gough, U. (1993). Ant defence of colonies ofAphis fabae Scopoli (Hemiptera: Aphididae), against predation by ladybirds.Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 6 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P. (1984). Predator-prey dynamics in spatially structured populations: Manipulating dispersal in a coccinellid-aphid interaction.Lect. Notes Biomath. 54 368–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., and Odell, G. (1987). Swarms of predators exhibit “preytaxis” if individual predators use area-restricted search.Am. Nat. 130 233–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., and Perry, R. (1989). Leaf overlap and the ability of ladybird beetles to search among plants.Ecol. Entomol. 14 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausnitzer, B. (1969). Zur Kenntnis der Entomoparasiten mitteleuropäischer Coccinellidae.Abh. Ber. Naturkundl. Mus. Görlitz 44 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingauf, F. (1967). Abwehr- und Meidereaktionen von Blattläusen (Aphididae) bei Bedrohung durch Räuber und Parasiten.Z. Angew. Entomol. 59 277–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koptur, S. (1991). Extrafloral nectaries of herbs and trees: Modelling the interaction with ants and parasitoids. In Huxley, C. R., and Cutler, D. F. (eds.),Ant-Plant interactions, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, pp. 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korschefsky, R. (1934).Platynaspis luteorubra Goeze, ein neuer Larventypus der Coccinelliden.Arb. Physiol. Angew. Entomol. 1 278–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiter, S., and Iperti, G. (1986). Effectiveness ofAdalia bipunctata against aphids in a peach orchard with special reference to ant-aphid relationships. In Hodek, I. (ed.),Ecology of Aphidophaga II, Academic, Prague, pp. 537–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letourneau, D. K. (1990). Code of ant-plant mutualism broken by parasite.Science 248 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer, M., and Völkl, W. (1993). Regulation of aphid populations by aphidiid wasps: Does aphidiid foraging behaviour or hyperparasitism limit impact?Oecologia 94 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerus, M. E. N. (1989).Coccinella magnifica (Redtenbacher): A myrmecophilous ladybird.Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 2 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschwitz, U., Schroth, M., Manel, M., and Tho, Y. P. (1984). Lycaenids parasitizing symbiotic ant-plant partnerships.Oecologia 64 78–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamuta, K. (1985). Mechanism of the switchover from extensive to area-contracted search behaviour of the ladybird beetle,Coccinella septempunctata bruckii.J. Insect Physiol. 31 849–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nault, L. R., Montgomery, M. E., and Bowers, W. S. (1976). Ant-aphid associations: Role of aphid alarm pheromone.Science 192 1349–1351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J. M., Deroe, C., Tursch, B., Braekman, J. C., Daloze, D., and Hootele, C. J. (1973). Distributions et activités des alcaloides défensifs des Coccinellidae.J. Insect Physiol. 19 1771–1784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, N. E. (1987). The evolution and biogeography between lycaenid butterflies and ants. In Harvey, P., and Patridge, L. (eds.),Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, N. E., and Easteal, S. (1986). The selective advantage of attendant ants for the larvae of a lycaenid butterfly,Glaucopsyche lygdamus.J. Anim. Ecol. 55 451–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, N. E., and Elgar, M. A. (1985). The influence of ants on host plant selection byJalmenus evagoras, a myrmecophilic lycaenid butterfly.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, N. E., Kitching, R. L., Buckley, R. C., Taylor, M. F. J., and Benbow, K. (1987). Costs and benefits of cooperation between the Australian lycaenid butterfly,Jalmenus evagoras and its attendant ants.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontin, A. J. (1960). Some records of predators and parasites adapted to attack aphids attended by ants.Entomol. Monthly Mag. Lond. 95 154–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, C. (1979). L'apparate boccale pungente succhiante della larva diePlatynaspis luteorubra Goeze (Col., Cocc.).Boll. Lab. Ent. Agrar. Portici 36 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A. (1980). Optimal foraging: Partial consumption of prey.Am. Nat. 116 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, 2nd ed., Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler, B. (1991). Predation success ofCoccinella septempunctata when attacking differentUroleucon species. In Polgár, L., Chambers, R., Dixon, A. F. G., and Hodek, I. (eds.),Behaviour and Impact of Aphidophaga, SPB Academic, The Hague, pp. 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stary, P. (1966). Aphid parasites (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae) and their relationship to aphid-attending ants, with respect to biological control.Insect Soc. 13 185–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takada, H., and Hashimoto, Y. (1985). Association of the root aphid parasitoidsAclitus sappaphis andParalipsis eikoae (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae) with the aphid-attending antsPheidole fervida andLasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Kontyu 53 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tursch, B., Daloze, D., Dupont, M., Pasteels, J. M., and Tricot, M. C. (1971). A defensive alkaloid in a carnivorous beetle.Experientia 27 1380–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, R. K., and Wojcik, D. P. (1982). Chemical mimicry in a myrmecophilous beetle,Myrmecaphodius excavaticollis.Science 218 806–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, R. K., Jouvenaz, D. P., and Wojcik, D. P. (1989). Chemical mimicry in a parasitoid (Hymenoptera: Eucharitidae) of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 15 2247–2261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W. (1990). Fortpflanzungsstrategien von Blattlausparasitoiden (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae): Konsequenzen ihrer Interaktionen mit Wirten und Ameisen. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Bayreuth.

  • Völkl, W. (1992). Aphids or their parasitoids: Who actually benefits from ant-attendance?J. Anim. Ecol. 61 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W. (1994). The effect of ant-attendance on the foraging tactic of the aphid parasitoidLysiphlebus cardui.Oikos 70 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völkl, W., and Mackauer, M. (1993). Interactions between ants and parasitoid wasps foraging forAphis fabae spp.cirsiiacanthoidis on thistles.J. Insect Behav. 6 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, M. J. (1954). Studies on the association of the ant,Oecophylla longinoda (Latr.) (Formicidae) with the scale insectSaissetia zanzibarensis Williams (Coccidae).Bull. Entomol. Res. 45 113–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, M. J. (1963). Mutualism between ants and honeydew-producing homoptera.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 8 307–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwölfer, H. (1958). Zur Systematik, Biologie und Ökologie unterirdisch lebender Aphiden (Hom., Aphidoidea) (Anoeciinae, Tetraneurini, Pemphigini und Fordinae).Z. Angew. Entomol. 43 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Völkl, W. Behavioral and morphological adaptations of the coccinellid,Platynaspis luteorubra for exploiting ant-attended resources (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). J Insect Behav 8, 653–670 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01997236

Key words

Navigation