Skip to main content
Log in

Arsenic: opportunity for risk assessment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Archives of Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arsenic is a human carcinogen that in small amounts is widely distributed in food and water. It has been regulated for almost 100 years worldwide and in the United States, on the judgment of the Royal Commission on Arsenic that a classical threshold of toxicity exists and that a daily intake of 400 (Μg/day is safe. Modern regulatory thinking in the United States has not accepted safe levels for carcinogens and is thus in conflict with the arsenic standard. Recent epidemics of arsenicism have quantitatively confirmed that threshold not only for the non-cancerous arsenical skin lesions but also for arsenical skin and internal cancers. Research shows that arsenic is a general gene inducer. Genes induced are involved in proliferation, recombination, amplification and the activation of viruses. This characterizes arsenic as anindirect carcinogen and provides a molecular basis for risk assessment and the observed threshold dose response. In the United States at present, about 300 cases of occupational arsenical cancer, declining in numbers, are known. Background arsenic below the drinking water standard is not known to have produced disease. The conspicuous nature of arsenical skin disease presents an unusual opportunity for a simplified survey of arsenical skin disease to support regulatory standards for arsenic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert RE, Train RE, Anderson E (1977) Rationale developed by the Environmental Protection Agency for the assessment of carcinogenic risks. J Natl Cancer Inst 58: 1537–1541

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andelman JB, Barnett M (1986) Feasibility study to resolve questions on the relationship of arsenic in drinking water to skin cancer. In: Kopfler FC, Craun GF (eds) Environmental epidemiology. Lewis Publishers, Inc. 1986 Chelsea, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Amtmann E, Sauer G (1982) Activation of non-expressed bovine papilloma virus genomes by tumor promoters. Nautre 296: 675–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appel KE, Hildebrandt AG (1984) Tumorpromotors, Documentation of an Expert Discussion; MMV Medizin Verlag München. 177 pages in German. The conclusions of this workshop have been published: Appel KE, Bannasch P, Fürstenberger G, Hapke HJ, Hecker E, Hildebrandt AG, Koransky W, Marks F, Neumann HG, Ohnesorge FK, Preussmann R and Schulte-Herrmann (1990) Chemical carcinogenesis: definitions of terms used. J. Cancer Res Clin Oncol 116: 232–236

  • Beckman G, Beckman L, Nordenson I (1977) Chromosome aberrations in workers exposed to arsenic. Environ Health Perspect 19: 1145–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt HM, Gelbke HP, Greim H, Kimmerle G, Laib, HG, Neumann HK, Norpoth HK, Pott F, Steinhoff D, Wardenbach P (1988) Materials suspected of carcinogenic potential: problems and possibilities for solutions. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed PrÄventivmed 23: 139–144 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgono JM, Greiber R (1972) Epidemiological study of arsenicism in the city of Antofagasta. In Hemphill DD (ed) Trace substances in environmental health V. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, MO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgdorf W, Kurvink K, Cervenka J (1977) Elevated sister chromatid exchange rate in lymphocytes of subjects treated with arsenic. Hum Genet 36: 69–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C-J, Juo T-L, Wu M-M (1988) Arsenic and cancers. The Lancet, Feb 20, 414–415

  • Crump KS, Hoel DG, Langley CH, Peto R (1976) Fundamental processes and their implications for low dose risk assessment. Cancer Res 36: 2973–2979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1988) Risk assessment for tetrachloroethylene. In: Maximum concentrations at the workplace and biological tolerance values for working materials. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Enterline PE, Marsh GM (1980) Mortality studies of smelter workers. Am J Ind Med 1: 251–259

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig R (1984) Genetic mode of action of cocarcinogens and tumor promoters in yeast and mice. Mol Gen Genet 194: 7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feron VJ, Grice HC, Griesemer R, Peto R, Agathe C, Althoff G, Ito N, Kimmerle G, Kroes R, Mohr U, Napalkov NP, Odashima S, Page NP, Schramm T, Steinhoff D, Sugar J, Tomatis I, Uehleke H, Vouk V (1980) Basic requirements for long term assays for carcinogenicity. In: Long term and short term screening assays for carcinogens. IARC Monographs, Supplement 2. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, pp 21–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartrell MJ, Craun JC, Podrebarac DS, Gunderson EL (1986) Pesticides, selected elements and other chemicals in adult total diet samples. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 69: 146–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham JH, Helwig EB (1972) Premalignant cutaneous and mucocutaneous diseases. In: Graham JH, Johnson A, Helwig EB (eds) Dermal Pathology, Harper and Row, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain (1903) Royal Commission on Arsenic Poisoning, Part 2 Report. Wyman and Sons, London. A summary is published as: The final report of the Royal Commission on Arsenic Poisoning. Lancet, Dec 1903, pp 1674–1676 and 1746–1748

  • Guha Mazumder DN, Chakraborty AK, Ghose A, Gupta JD, Chakraborty DP, Dey SB, Chattopadhyay (1988) Chronic arsenic toxicity from drinking tube well water in rural West Bengal. Bull WHO 66: 499–506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hecker E, Rippmann F (1988) Quantitative determination of experimental threshold dose (no-effect-levels) for environmental promoters in the initiation-promotion protocol on skin of NMRI mice. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol (Suppl.) 338: R 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RN, Erdreich LS, Paynter OE, Roberts PA, Rosenthal SA, Wilkinson CF (1989) Thyroid follicular cell carcinogenesis. Fundam Appl Toxicol 12: 629–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huh N-h, Satoh MS, Shiga J, Rajewski MF, Kuroki T (1989) Immunological detection of O4-ethylthymine in liver DNA of individuals with and without malignant tumors. Cancer Res 49: 93–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J (1888) On some examples of arsenic keratoses of the skin and of arsenic cancer. Trans Pathol Soc (London) 39: 352–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group (IRLG) (1979) Scientific basis for identification of potential carcinogens and estimation of risks. J Natl Cancer Inst 63: 245–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes R (1987) Contribution of toxicology towards risk assessment of carcinogens. Arch Toxicol 60: 224–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TC, Ostamura M, Barrett JC (1985) Carcinogenesis 6: 1421–1425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T-C, Tanaka N, Lamb PW, Gilmer TM, Barrett CJ (1988) Induction of gene amplification by arsenic. Science 241: 79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Madhukar BV, Brewster DW, Matsumura F (1984) Effects of in vivo administered TCDD on receptor binding of epidermal growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 7407–7411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell JM, Mayr AJ, Martin WJ (1989) DNA of human papilloma virus type 16 in dysplastic and malignant lesions of the conjunctiva and cornea. N Engl J Med 320: 1442–1445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller EC (1978) Some current perspective on chemical carcinogenesis in humans and experimental animals. Cancer Res 38: 1479–1496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell N, Stöhrer G (1986) Mutagenesis originating in site-specific DNA damage. J Mol Biol 191: 177–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell PJ, Tjian R (1989) Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence specific DNA Binding proteins. Science 245: 371–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morton W, Starr G, Pohl D, Stoner RS, Wagner S, Weswig P (1976) Skin cancer and water arsenic in Lane County, Oregon. Cancer 37: 2523–2532

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer O (1947) Arsenical cancer: a review. Br J Cancer 1: 192–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Science and Technology Policy (1985) Chemical carcinogens: review of the science and its associated principles. Federal Register 50: 10372–10442

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker KR, von Borstel RC (1987) Base substitution and frameshift mutagenesis by sodium chloride and potassium chloride in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 189: 11–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ptashne M (1989) How gene activators work. Sci Am 260 [1]: 40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield RR, Burke DS (1988) HIV infection: the clinical picture. Sci Am 259 [4]: 90–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice JD, Nikdel S, Purvis AC (1985) Maturity spray residue determination and early season acid accumulation in grapefruit. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 98: 224–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries LA, Hankey BF, Edwards BK (1990) Survey epidemiology and end result. Cancer Statistics Review 1973–87. NIH Publ. 90–2789

  • Schönthal A, Herrlich P, Rahmsdorf HJ, Ponta H (1988) Requirement for fos gene expression in the transcriptional activation of collagenase by other oncogenes and phorbol. Cell 54: 325–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schottenfeld D, Gantt RC, Wynder EL (1974) Tobacco and tobacco smoke. Prev Med 3: 277–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter C, Parzefall W, Schröter H, Schulte-Hermann R (1987) Doseresponse study on effects of hexachlorocyclohexane on putative preneoplastic foci, monoxygenase and growth in liver. Cancer Res 47: 80–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hermann R (1985) Study on tumor promoters and apparent tumor stages in the liver. Arch Toxicol 57: 147–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scotto J, Fears TR, Fraumeni JF Jr (1983) Non-melanoma skin Cancer. US Department of Health and Human Services. NIH Publication No. 83–2433

  • Southwick JW, Western AE, Beck MM, Whitley T, Isaacs, Petajan J, Hansen CD (1981) Community health associated with arsenic in drinking water in Millard County, Utah. US EPA Document 600/1-81-064

  • Stöhrer G (1989) Arsenical disease in the United States. EPA 68-C8-0033-12

  • Storz G, Tartaglia LA, Ames BN (1990) Transcriptional regulator of oxidative stress inducible genes: direct activation by oxidation. Science 248: 189–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swenberg JA, Heck HA, Morgan KT, Starr MS (1987) A scientific approach to formaldehyde risk assessment. Banbury Report 25: 151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng W-P, Chu HM, How SW, Fong JM, Lin CS, Yeh S (1968) Prevalence of skin cancer in an endemic area of chronic arsenicism in Taiwan. J Natl Cancer Inst 40: 453–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States (1959) 21 USC 348(c) (3) (A)

  • United States (1962) 1942 Drinking water standard. Referenced in: Drinking Water Standards Title 42, chapter 1, Part 72, Interstate Quarantine Federal Register 2152 (March 6, 1962)

  • United States (1986) Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments. 42 USC 300 f et sequ.

  • Upton AC (1988) In: Cothern CR, Mehlman MA, Marcus WL (eds) Risk assessment and risk management of industrial and environmental chemicals. Princeton Scientific Publishing Co, Inc, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1976) Interim procedures and guidelines for health risk and economic impact assessments of suspected carcinogens. Federal Register 31: 21 402–21 405

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1984) Health assessment document for inorganic arsenic

  • US EPA (1986) Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment

  • US EPA (1987) Estimated national occurrence and exposure to arsenic in public drinking water supplies

  • US EPA (1988) Special report on ingested inorganic arsenic

  • Welch WJ, Suhan JP (1986) Cellular and biochemical events in mammalian cells during and after recovery from physiological stress. J Cell Biol 103: 2035–2052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wile U (1912) Arsenical keratosis and cancer. J Cutan Dis 10: 192–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff GL, Roberts DW, Morissey DW, Greenman DL, Allen RR, Campbell WL, Bergman H, Nesnow S, Frith CH (1987) Tumorigenic response to lindane in mice: potentiation by a dominant mutation. Carcinogenesis 8: 1889–1897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh H (1973) Skin cancer in chronic arsenicism. Hum Pathol 4: 469–485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stöhrer, G. Arsenic: opportunity for risk assessment. Arch Toxicol 65, 525–531 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01973711

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01973711

Key words

Navigation