Skip to main content
Log in

Apparent superiority of H2-receptor stimulation and simultaneousβ-blockade over conventional treatment withβ-sympathomimetic drugs in post-acute myocardial infarction: Cardiac effects of impromidine — a new specific H2-receptor agonist — in the surviving catecholamine-insensitive myocardium

  • Histamine and Kinins
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Left ventricular infarction (AMI) was produced in experimental animals and the contractile response to β-adrenergic and H2-histaminergic stimulation by isoproterenol and impromidine tested in the isolated perfused heart preparation. Adenylate cyclase activity as well as binding characteristics of [3H]-dihydroalprenolol ([3H]-DHA), [3H]-methyl-tiotidine ([3H]-TIOT) and [3H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]-QNB) to cardiacβ 1-, H2- and cholinergic muscarinic receptors were determined in sarcolemmal membrane preparations of the right ventricle of the same hearts. In addition, an attempt was made to elucidate the therapeutic value of post-AMI treatment with impromidine in the presence and absence ofβ-sympathomimetic, in contrast to administration of prenalterol and the conventional therapy with β-sympathomimetic drugs, e.g. dobutamine. Three days post-AMI the dose-response curve for isoproterenol of right ventriculardP/dt max was significantly depressed, while the inotropic effect of impromidine was not impaired. Stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity by isoproterenol was reduced by 80% whereas impromidine and NaF stimulation rates were unaltered. Receptor-binding studies indicated a 90% loss and 10-times lowered affinity (K D) of the remaining β-receptors while specific [3H]-TIOT- and [3H]-QNB-binding was unchanged.

Administration of dobutamine increased mortality rates and extension of infarct size, led to a further decrease in contractile response to isoproterenol, induced complete insensitivity of adenylate cyclase to isoproterenol stimulation and caused pronounced additional reduction of number and affinity of [3H]-DHA-binding sites. In contrast, all above alterations were prevented by treatment with either prenalterol or combined administration of impromidine plus metoprolol. It is concluded, that these alterations in the non-ischemic, uninvolved myocardium post-AMI are the result of catecholamine-induced specific damage of sarcolemmal β-receptors. Furthermore, treatment with H2-agonists in combination with β-blocking agents may have beneficial effects, whereas conventional therapy with β-sympathomimetic drugs tends to worsen the already depressed function of the β-adrenergic stimulation mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Baumann, G. Riess, W.D. Erhardt, S.B. Felix, L. Ludwig, G. Blümel andH. Blömer,Impaired beta-adrenergic stimulation in the uninvolved ventricle post-acute myocardial infarction: reversible defect due to excessive circulating catecholamine-induced decline in number and affinity of beta-receptors, Am. Heart J.101, 569–581 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.A.A. Owen, C.A. Harvey andR.W. Gristwood,Cardiovascular studies with impromidine (SK&F 92676), a new very potent and specific histamine H 2 -receptor agonist, J. Pharmac.31, 577–582 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Baumann, S.B. Felix, J. Schrader, C.D. Heidecke, G. Riess, W.D. Erhardt, L. Ludwig, U. Loher, F. Sebening andH. Blömer,Cardiac contractile and metabolic effects mediated via the myocardial H 2 -receptor adenylate cyclase system: characterization of two new specific H 2 -receptor-agonists, impromidine and dimaprit, in the guinea pig and human myocardium, Res. exp. Med.179, 81–98 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Neumann, W. Erhardt, B. Oberhuber, R. Fritsch andC. Blümel,A new highly potent and short-acting analgesic, Carfentanyl (R33799), in combination with hypnotic agent, Etomidat (R26490), as a method of anaesthesia in guinea pigs, Res. exp. Med.177, 135–143 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Schrader, G. Baumann andE. Gerlach,Adenosine as inhibitor of myocardial effects of catecholamines, Pflügers Arch.372, 29–35 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.K. Kjekshus andB.E. Sobel,Depressed myocardial creatine phosphokinase activity following experimental myocardial infarction in rabbit, Circulation Res.27, 403–414 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.I. Drummond andI. Duncan,Adenylate cyclase in cardiac tissues, J. biol. Chem.245, 976–983 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. Krawietz, D. Poppert, E. Erdmann, H. Glossmann, C.J. Struck andC. Konrad,β-Adrenergic receptors in guinea pig myocardial tissues Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmak.295, 215–224 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Salomon, C. Londos andM. Rodbell,A highly sensitive adenylate cyclase assay, Analyst. Biochem.58, 541–548 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.Z. Fields, W.R. Roeske, E. Morkin andH.I. Yamamura,Cardiac muscarinic cholinergic receptors. Biochemical identification and characterization, J. biol. Chem.253, 3251–3258 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Baumann, J. Schrader andE. Gerlach,Stimulation of contractile force and adenylate cyclase in the myocardium by histamine and dopamine: effects of adenosine, Pflügers Arch. (suppl.)373, 18 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Baumann, G. Riess, W.D. Erhardt, S.B. Felix andH. Blömer,Reduzierte β-adrenerge Ansprechbarkeit im nicht ischämischen Myokard nach experimentellem Herzinfarkt, Z. Kardiol.69, 209 (abstract) (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Baumann, J. Schrader andE. Gerlach,Inhibitory action of adenosine on histamine- and dopamine-stimulated cardiac contractility and adenylate cyclase in guinea pigs, Circulation Res.48, 259–266 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.L. Baumann, S.B. Felix, W.D. Erhardt, G. Riess, C.D. Heidecke, L. Ludving andH. Blömer, Effektive Protektion desβ 1-andrenergen Stimulations-mechanisms durchβ-Blockade nach experimentellemHerzinfarkt: Steigarung der Kontraktilität durch simultane Stimulation mit H 2 -Agonisten}, Z. Kardiol.70, 268–272 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Baumann, G. Riess, S.B. Felix, L. Ludwig, U. Loher andH. Blömer,Cardiac contractile and metabolic effects mediated via the H 2 -receptor adenylate cyclase system in the guinea pig and human myocardium, Eur. Heart J (suppl. A)2, 139 (abstract) (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.A. Richardson, E.F. Woods andE.E. Bagwell,Circulating epinephrine and norepinephrine in coronary occlusion, Am. J. Cardiol.5, 613–618 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.A. Richardson,Circulating levels of catecholamines in acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris, Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis.6, 56–62 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Valori, M. Thomas andJ.P. Shillingford,Urinary excretion of free noradrenaline and adrenaline following acute myocardial infarction, Lancet1, 127–130 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Swedberg, F. Waagstein, A. Hjalmarson andI. Wallentin,Prolongation of survival in congestive cardiomyopathy by β-receptor blockade. Lancet1, 1374–1376 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Wirtzfeld, G. Klein, W. Delius andD. Sack,Treatment of acute myocardial infarction with metoprolol, Dt. med. Wschr.103, 566–574 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Delius, A. Wirtzfeld, P. Dominiak, H. Sebening, H. Blömer andH. Grobecker,Effects of acute beta-adrenoceptor blockade (metoprolol i.v.) on plasma norepinephrine concentration and hemydynamics and postmyocardial infarction patients, Z. Kardiol.68, 441–448 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T.P. Kenakin andD. Beck, Is prenalterol (H133/80) really a selectiveβ-adrenoceptor agonist? Tissue selectivity resulting from difference in stimulus-response relationaships, J. Pharmac. exp. Ther.213, 406–413 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. U. Johansson andB. Waldeck,β 1 -Adrenoceptors mediating relaxation of the guinea pig trachea: experiments with prenalterol, a β, selective adrenoceptor agonist., J. Pharm. Pharmac.33, 353–356 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.H.T. Scott, A.R.N. Boyes andD.B. Scott,Cardiovascular effects of prenalterol (H133/22) in normal man. Br. J. Pharmac.7, 365–371 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  25. O. Rönn, C. Graffner, G. Johnsson, L. Jordö, P. Lundborg andJ. Wikstrand, Haemodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics of a new selective β2 adrenoceptor agonist, prenalterol, and its interaction with metoprolol in man, Europ. J. Clin. Pharmac.15, 9–15 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Ariniego, F., Waagstein, B. Mombay andA. Hjalmarson, Haemodynamic effects of a new β-blocking agents, Br. Heart. J.42, 139–146 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Reiz, S. Nath andE. Ponten,Hemodynamic effects of prenalterol, a β 1 -adrenoceptor agonist, prenalterol, in hypotension induced high thoracic epidural block in man, Acta anaesth. scand.23, 93–99 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  28. T.L. Svendsen, O.J. Hartling andJ. Trap-Jensen,Immediate haemodynamic effects of prenalterol, a new specific adrenergic beta-1-receptor agonist in healthy volunteers, Eur. J. Clin. Pharmac.18, 219–226 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  29. A. Hedberg, InStudies on beta-1 and beta-2-adrenoceptor mechanism in the mammalian heart with special reference to the action of prenalterol, (Dissertation) University of Göteborg, Department of Pharmacology, S-40033 Göteborg, Sweden.

  30. C.A. Chidsey, G.H. Kaiser, E.H. Sonnenblick, J.F. Spann andE. Braunwald,Cardiac norepinephrine stores in experimental heart failure in the dog, J. clin. Invest.43, 2386–2392 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Mathes, C. Cowan andS. Gudbjarnason,Storage and metabolism of norepinephrine after experimental myocardial infarction, Am. J. Physiol.220, 27–32 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. Mathes andS. Gudbjarnason,Changes in norepinephrine stores in the canine heart following experimental myocardial infarction, Am. Heart J.81, 211–217 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Levitzki, InReceptors and Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 199–229 (EdsP. Cuatrecasas andM.F. Greaves). Chapman Hall, London 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J.A. Thomas andB.H. Marks,Plasma norepinephrine in congestive heart failure, Am. J. Cardiol.41, 233–243 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  35. W.S. Colucci, R.W. Alexander, G.D. Williams, R.E. Rude, B.L. Holman, M.A. Konstam, J. Wynne, G.H. Mudge andE. Braunwald,Decreased lymphocyte beta-adrenergic-receptor density in patients with heart failure and tolerance to the beta-adrenergic agonist pirbuterol, New Engl. J. Med.305, 185–190 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  36. C.A. Chidsey, E. Braunwald andH.G. Morrow,Catecholamine excretion and cardiac stores of norepinephrine in congestive heart failure, Am. J. Med.39, 442–446 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by grants Ba 666/1 and Ba 666/2-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

Data presented in this paper are part of a doctoral thesis by Dr S.B. Felix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baumann, G., Felix, S.B., Heidecke, C.D. et al. Apparent superiority of H2-receptor stimulation and simultaneousβ-blockade over conventional treatment withβ-sympathomimetic drugs in post-acute myocardial infarction: Cardiac effects of impromidine — a new specific H2-receptor agonist — in the surviving catecholamine-insensitive myocardium. Agents and Actions 15, 216–228 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01972352

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01972352

Keywords

Navigation