Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phytotoxins as tools in breeding and selection of disease-resistant plants

  • Multi-author Review
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conventional plant breeding for resistance to pathogens, although successful, is in many cases still too slow to keep pace with pathogen adaptation, and suffers from the lack of genetic variability in cultivated varieties. Phytotoxins, because of their role in disease development, have been proposed as convenient markers for early screening of resistant genotypes and as selective agents for in vitro selection. The present review summarizes, firstly, the evidence for a genetic correlation between tolerance to toxins and resistance to pathogens, with particular reference to host-selective toxins (HST) and factors affecting early screening. There follows a discussion of results obtained from the use of phytotoxins for in vitro selection of resistant plants. The conclusion is drawn that this practice, while potentially useful in the case of HST, leads to contradictory results when ill-defined toxins or culture filtrates are used. Finally, prospects for future research are adumbrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadie, M., and Boudart, G., Cytological and ultrastructural studies on disease of crucifers caused by the fungusLeptosphaeria maculans, imperfect stagePhoma lingam. Ann. Sci. nat. (1982) 53–72.

  2. Anon, J., Oilseed Rape, Booklet 2278. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, London 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anon, J., Recommended varieties of oilssed rape. Farmer's Leaflet No. 9. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anon, J., Recommended varieties of oilseed rape. Farmer's Leaflet No. 9. National Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arcioni, S., Pezzotti, M., and Damiani, F., In vitro selection of alfalfa plants resistant toFusarium oxysporumf f. sp.medicaginis. Theor. appl. Genet.74 (1987) 700–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey, J. A., and Mansfield, J. W., Phytoalexins. Blackie, Glasgow 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bains, P. S., and Tewari, J. P., Purification, chemical characterization and host-specificity of the toxin produced byAlternaria brassicae. Physiol. molec. Plant Path.30 (1987) 259–271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ballance, M., Lamari, L., and Bernier, C. S., Purification and characterization of a host-selective necrosis toxin fromPyrenophora tritici repentis. Physiol. molec. Plant Path.35 (1989) 203–213.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barden, K., Schiller Smith, S., and Murakishi, H. H., Regeneration and screening of tomato somaclones for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Sci.45 (1986) 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Behnke, M., General resistance to late blight ofSolanum tuberosum plants regenerated from callus resistant to culture filtrates ofPhytophthora infestans. Theor. appl. Genet.56 (1980) 151–152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boudart, G., Phytotoxine et nécrose des hypocotyles de cruciféres infectées parLeptosphaeria maculans (Ces. et De Not.) et sa forme imparfaitePhoma lingam. Phytopath. Z.92 (1978) 76–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Boudart, G., Modalités de l'attaque parasitaire des cruciféres parLeptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. et de Not. (f.c.Phoma lingam) agent de la nécrose du collet. Determinisme moleculaire du pouvoir pathogéne. Ph. D. Thesis, Université des Sciences et Tecniques. Lille 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bousquet, J. F., Férézou, J. P., Devys, M., and Barbier, M., Sur une toxine produite par le champignonPhoma lingam Tode parasite du Colza: Isolement et propriétés. C.r. Acad. Sci., Paris Sér. D.284 (1977) 927–928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brettell, R. I. S., Thomas, F., and Ingram, D. S., Reversion of Texas male sterile cytoplasm maize in culture to give fertile, T-toxin resistant plants. Theor. appl. Genet.58 (1980) 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buiatti, M., Use of cell and tissue cultures for mutation breeding, in: Science for Plant Breeding, pp. 179–201. Ed. G. Robbelen. Paul Parey, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buiatti, M., and Scala, A., In vitro analysis of plant-pathogen interactions and selection procedures, in: Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, Application to Crop Improvement, pp. 331–340. Eds F. J. Novak, L. Havel and J. Dolezel. Czechoslovak Academy of Science, Prague 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buiatti, M., Scala, A., Bettini, P., Nascari, G., Morpurgo, R., Bogani, P., Pellegrini, M. G., Gimelli, F., and Venturo, R., Correlation between in vivo resistance toFusarium and in vitro response to fungal elicitors and toxic substances in the carnation. Theor. appl. Genet.70 (1985) 42–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buiatti, M, In vitro host-parasite interactions and selection for resistance, in: BAP Final Report on Plant Biotechnology in the European Community, Bad Honnef 19–21 Dec. 1989, pp. 127–129.

  19. Carlson, P. S., Methionine-sulfoximine resistant mutants of tobacco. Science180 (1973) 1366–1368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Clouse, S. D., and Gilchrist, D. G., Interaction of theasc locus in F8 paired lines of tomato withAlternaria alternata f. sp.lycopersici and AAL-toxin. Phytopathology77 (1987) 80–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Debnath, S. C., Zuechner, S., and Wenzel, G., Study on resistance to potato virus-X in the protoclones of some dihaploid potato clones developed through anther culture. Int. Congr. Plant Tissue Cell Culture 1986, p. 229.

  22. Delwiche, J., Genetic aspects of blackleg (Leptospheria maculans) resistance in rapeseed (Brassica napus). PhD Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dixon, R. A., The phytoalexin response: elicitation, signalling and control of gene expression. Biol. Rev.61 (1986) 239–291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dixon, L. K., Leaver, C. J., Brettell, I. S., and Gengenbach, B. G., Mitochondrial sensitivity toDrechslera maydis T-toxin and the synthesis of a variant mitochondrial polypeptide in plants derived from maize tissue cultures with Texas male sterile cytoplasm. Theor. appl. Genet.63 (1982) 75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Earle, E. D., Phytotoxin studies with plant cells and protoplasts, in: Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Plant Tissue Cell Culture, pp. 363–373. University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Earle, E. D., Gracon, V. E., Yoder, O. C., and Gemmill, K. P., Cytoplasm specific effects ofHelminthosporium maydis race T toxin on survival of corn mesophyll-protoplasts. Plant Physiol.61 (1978) 420–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Férézou, J. P., Riche, C., Quesneau-Thierry, A., Pascard-Billy, C., Barbier, M., Bousquet, J. F., and Boudart, G., Structure de deux toxines isolés de cultures du champignonPhoma lingam Tode. Nouv. J. Chim.1 (1977) 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Furusawa, I., Mizuguchi, A., Thanutong, P., Kodama, M., and Nishimura, S, Resistant tobacco plants from protoplasts derived calluses screened for resistance toAlternaria toxins. Int. Symp. Genetic Manipulation of Crops 1984, p. 63.

  29. Gavazzi, G., Tonelli, C., Todesco, G., Arrighini, F., Raffaldi, F., Sala, F., Biasini, M. G., Vecchio, F., and Barberi, F., Chemically induced mutagenesis versus somaclonal variation in tomato. Theor. appl. Genet.74 (1987) 733–739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gengenbach, B. C., Green, C. F., and Donovan, C. M., Inheritance of selected pathotoxin resistance in maize plants regenerated from cell cultures. Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA74 (1977) 5113–5117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gilchrist, D. G., and Harada, J. J., Mode and physiological consequence of AAL-toxin interaction with theasc locus in tomato, in: Phytotoxins and Plant Pathogenesis, pp. 113–121. Eds R. D. Durbin, A. Graniti and A. Ballio. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Godwin, I. D., Gordon, G. H., and Cameron, D. F., Callus culture derived somaclonal variation in the tropical pasture legumesStylosanthes guianensis, S. hamata andS. cabra. Int. Congr. Plant Tissue Cell Culture 1986, p. 215.

  33. Gretenkort, M., Studies of the expression of the interaction betweenLeptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. e De Not. and cultured tissue ofBrassica napus L. ssp.oleifera (Metzg.) Sinsk. PhD Thesis, Cambridge 1989.

  34. Haberlach, G., Budde, A. D., Sequeira, L., and Helgeson, J. P., Modification of disease resistance of tobacco callus tissue by cytokinins. Plant Physiol.62 (1978) 522–525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hammerschlag, F. A., Selection of peach cells for insensitivity to culture filtrates ofXanthomonas campestris pv.pruni and regeneration of resistant plants. Theor. appl. Genet.76 (1988) 805–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanaczywski, P., and Drisdale, R. B., Variation in pathogenicity ofLeptosphaeria maculans to oilseed rape and other brassicas, in: Aspects of Applied Biology, vol. 6, pp. 343–353. Assocation of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne Warwick, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heinz, D. J., Krishnamurti, M., and Maretzki, A., Sugarcane tissue and organ culture, in: Applied and Fundamental Aspects of Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, pp. 3–17. Eds J. Reinert and Y. P. S. Bajaj. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ingram, D. S., Loh, C. S., MacDonald, M., and Newsholme, D. M., Secondary embryogenesis inBrassica: a tool for research and crop improvement. Proc. Phytochem. Soc. Eur.23 (1984) 219–242.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ingram, D. S., and MacDonald, M. V., In vitro selection of mutants, in: Nuclear techniques and in vitro culture for plant improvement, pp. 241–257. Ed. E. Dicke. IAEA, Vienna 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kohmoto, K., Verma, V. S., Nishimura, S., Tagami, M., and Scheffer, R. P., New outbreak ofAlternaria stem canker of tomato in Japan and production of host-selective toxins by the causal fungi. J. Fac. Agric., Tottori Univ.17 (1982) 1–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kohmoto, K., Otani, H., Kodama, M., and Nishimura, S., Host recognition: can accessibility to fungal invasion be induced by hostspecific toxins without necessitating necrotic cell death?, in: Phytotoxins and Plant Pathogenesis, pp. 113–129. Eds A. Graniti, R. D. Durbin and A. Ballio. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kono, Y., Structural studies on host-specific phytotoxins to corn blight and citrus blight spot disease, in: Phytotoxins and Plant Pathogenesis, pp. 7–23. Eds A. Graniti, R. D. Durbin and A. Ballio. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg 1989.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Lerario, P., and Graniti, A., Attività fitotossica della pirenoforina e sua produzione nelle culture diPyrenophora avenae Ito et Kurib. Phytopath. Medit.24 (1985) 280–283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ling, D. H., Vidhyasekaran, P., Borromeo, E. S., Zapata, F. J., and Mew, T. W., In vitro screening of rice germplasm for resistance to brown-spot disease using phytotoxin isolated fromHelminthosporium oryzae. Theor. appl. Genet.71 (1985) 133–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Loh, C. S., Towards the production of improved winter oilseed rape through tissue culture. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge 1982.

  46. MacDonald, V. M., and Ingram, D. S., Towards the selection in vitro for resistance toAlternaria brassicicola (Schw.) Wilts, inBrassica napus spp.oleifera (Metzg.) Sinsk. winter oilseed rape. New Phytol.104 (1986) 621–629.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McCoy, T. J., Tissue culture selection and evaluation ofFusarium resistance in alfalfa disease resistance in propagated plants. In vitro23 (1987) 3 pt 2, 60 A.

    Google Scholar 

  48. McFarland, B. L., and Gilchrist, D. G., A proposed enzyme specific role for the host-specific toxins ofAlternaria alternata f. sp.lycopersici. Phytopathology71 (1980) 240–245.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mezzetti, B., Mittempergher, L., and Rosati, P.,Ophiostoma ulmi metabolites and elm cell membrane permeability. Possible use in early tests of resistance. Eur. J. For. Path.18 (1988) 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Miner, E., and Scheffer, R. P., The comparative effects ofPhyllosticta maydis andHelminthosporium maydis race T toxins on corn. Plant Physiol.63 (suppl.) (1979) 133.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nachmias, A., Barash, I., Solel, Z., and Strobel, G. A., Effect of mal secco toxin on lemon leaf cells. Phytoparasitica8 (1980) 51–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nelson, D. E., and Ullstrup, A. J., Resistance to leaf spot in maize. J. Hered.55 (1964) 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Newsholme, D. M., Studies of selection in vitro for resistance toLeptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. and de Not. (Stem Canker) using secondary embryogenic cultures ofBrassica napus ssp.oleifera (Metzg.) Sinsk. (winter oilseed rape). PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge 1985.

  54. Newsholme, D. M., MacDonald, M. V., and Ingram, D. S., Studies of selection in vitro for novel resistance to phytotoxic products ofLeptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. et Du Not. in secondary embryogenic lines ofBrassica napus spp.oleifera (Metzg.) Sinsk. (winter oilseed rape). New Phytol.113 (1989) 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pedras, M. S. C., Seguin Swartz, G., Petrie, G. A., and Abrams, S. R., Toxins ofLeptosphaeria maculans: production, isolation, derivation and phytotoxicity, in: Abstract of Crucifer Genetics Workshop IV. October 12–14, 1987, p. 9. Crucifer Genetics Cooperative, Dept. Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin Madison, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pellegrini, M. G., Garbuglia, A., Guerrazzi, S., Bogani, P., Bettini, P., Storti, E., Simeti, C., Buiatti, M., Broggio, M., and Nascari, G., In vitro analysis of defense mechanisms in the systemSolanum tuberosum-Alternaria alternata. J. Phytopath. (1990) in press.

  57. Rasmussen, J. B., and Scheffer, R. P., Isolation and biological activities of four selective toxins fromHelminthosporium carbonum. Plant Physiol.86 (1988) 187–191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Rines, H. W., and Luke, H. H., Selection and regeneration of toxin insensitive plants from tissue cultures of oats (Avena sativa) susceptible toHelminthosporium victoriae. Theor. appl. Genet.71 (1985) 16–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sacristán, M. D., Resistance response toPhoma lingam of plants regenerated from selected cell and embryogenic cultures of haploidBrassica napus. Theor. appl. Genet.61 (1982) 193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Scala, A., Toxins produced in culture byPhytophthora infestans race T1 and some of their effects on tomato, in: Phytotoxins and Plant Pathogenesis, p. 452–455. Eds A. Graniti, R. D. Durbin and A. Ballio. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Scala, A., Bettini, P., Buiatti, M., Bogani, P., Pellegrini, G., and Tognoni, F., Tomato-Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici interaction: ‘in vitro’ analysis of several possible pathogenic factors. Phytopath. Z.113 (1985) 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Scheffer, R. P., Host-specific toxins in relation to pathogenesis and disease resistance, in: Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, vol. 4, pp. 247–261. Eds R. Heitefuss and P. H. Williams. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schertz, K. F., and Tai, Y. P., Inheritance of reaction ofSorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. to toxin produced byPericonia circinata (Mang.) Sacc. Crop Sci.9 (1969) 621–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Shahin, E. A., and Spivey, R., A single dominant gene forFusarium wilt resistance in protoplast derived tomato plants. Theor. appl. Genet.73 (1986) 164–169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Shephard, S. L. K., Selection for early blight disease resistance in tomato: use of tissue culture withAlternaria solani culture filtrate. Int. Congr. Plant Tissue Cell Culture 1986, p. 211.

  66. Shohet, S., and Strange, R. N., Use of isolated cells and protoplasts to detect phytotoxin activity in cultures ofPhytophthora drechsleri f. sp.cajani. Physiol. molec. Plant Path.34 (1989) 345–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Sjödin, C., and Glimelius, K., Differences in response to the toxin sirodesmin PL produced byPhoma lingam (Tode) Desm. on protoplasts cell aggregates and intact plants of resistant and susceptibleBrassica accessions. Theor. appl. Genet.77 (1989) 76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sjödin, C., and Glimelius, N., Transfer of resistance againstPhoma lingam toBrassica napus by asymmetric somatic hybridization combined with toxin selection. Theor. appl. Genet.78 (1989) 513–520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Smith, S. S., and Murakishi, H., Genetic characteristics of somaclonal resistance to tomato mosaic virus (ToMV). Phytopathology77 (1987) 1705–1708.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Storti, E., Matteo, M., Tortorino, G., Pellegrini, M. G., Bettini, P., Bogani, P., Venturo, R., Brunatti, F., and Buiatti, M., Ion leakage in the presence of fungal toxins as a method for screening resistant genotypes. Acta horticult (in press).

  71. Storti, E., Bogani, P., Bettini, P., Bonzi-Morassi, L., Pellegrini, M. G., Matteo, M., Simeti, C., and Buiatti, M., The pleiotropic phenotype of tomato cells selected for altered response toFusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici cell wall components. Theor. appl. Genet.78 (1989) 689–695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sun, L., She, J., and Lu, X., In vitro induction and screening of mutants resistant toXanthomonas oryzae from calli regenerated rice plants. Int. Symp. Genetic Manipulation of Crops 1984, p. 46.

  73. Turner, P., and Graniti, A., Stomatal response of two almond cultivars to fusicoccin. Physiol. Plant Path.9 (1976) 175–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Vardi, A., Epstein, E., and Breiman, A., Is thePhytophthora citrophthora culture filtrate a reliable tool for the in vitro selection of resistantCitrus mutants? Theor. appl. Genet.72 (1986) 569–574.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Wenzel, G., Bruning, H., Foroughi Wehr, B., Grauer, A., Lind, V., Jahoor, A., and Herrmann, R. G., Identification of genes for disease resistance, in: Science for Plant Breeding, pp. 231–241. Ed. G. Robbelen, Paul Parev, Berlin 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wheeler, H. E., and Luke, H. H., Mass screening for disease resistant mutants in oats. Science122 (1955) 1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wilmot, P. B., Nickell, C. D., Widholm, J. M., and Gray, E. L., Evaluation of soyben resistance toPhialophora gregata culture filtrate in tissue culture. Theor. appl. Genet.77 (1989) 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Witsenboer, H. M. A., van Schaik, C. E., Bins, R. J., Loffler, H. J. M., Nijkamp, J. J., and Hille, J., Effects ofAlternaria alternata f. sp.lycopersici toxins at different levels of tomato plant cell development. Plant Sci.56 (1988) 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wright, J. C., and Lacey, M. L., Somaclonal variation occurring in disease response of regenerated celery plants from cell suspension and callus cultures. Phytopathology75 (1985) 967–970.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Yoder, O. C., Assay, in: Toxins in Plant Disease, pp. 45–78. Ed. R. D. Durbin. Academic Press, New York 1981.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e Genetica, Università, I-50125, Firenze, Italy

    M. Buitatti & D. S. Ingram

  2. Royal Botanic Garden, EH3 5LR, Edinburgh, Scotland

    M. Buitatti & D. S. Ingram

Authors
  1. M. Buitatti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. S. Ingram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buitatti, M., Ingram, D.S. Phytotoxins as tools in breeding and selection of disease-resistant plants. Experientia 47, 811–819 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922461

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922461

Key words

Search

Navigation