Skip to main content
Log in

Videocystourethrography with a ring pessary in situ. A clinically useful preoperative investigation for continent women with urogenital prolapse?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of a vaginal pessary in the detection of genuine stress incontinence (GSI) in women with urogenital prolapse undergoing urodynamic investigation. Continent women with urogenital prolapse, with or without associated urinary symptoms, were studied. All underwent video-cystourethrography using a standarized protocol. None had evidence of incontinence on provocative testing in the upright position. A well-fitting vaginal ring pessary was inserted to reduce the prolapse and mimic a vaginal repair. The provocative tests were then repeated while the bladder was screened. Seventy women with a mean age 59.0 years (range 34–83) were recruited over a 21-month period: 15 women complained of prolapse alone and 55 had concurrent urinary symptoms; 19 women (27%) developed GSI only following the insertion of a vaginal pessary. The women who became incontinent were significantly older (mean age 63.9 years) than those who remained continent (mean age 56.8 years) (P<0.020). The use of a vaginal pessary increases the detection rate of GSI in continent women with urogenital prolapse undergoing videocystourethrography. These findings are important becasuse women with prolapse and coexisting incontinence should be offered a continence procedure rather than a simple vaginal repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanton SL, Hilton P, Norton C, Cardozo L. Clinical and urodynamic effects of anterior colporrhaphy and vaginal hysterectomy for prolapse with and without incontinence.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982;89:459–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borstad E, Rud T. The risk of developing urinary stress-incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:545–549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bump RC, Fantl JA, Hurt WG. The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe urogenital prolapse: results of barrier studies.Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:291–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson DA, Bent AE, Ostergard DR. The effect of uterovaginal prolapse on urethrovesical pressure dynamics.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:901–905

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton SL. Vaginal prolapse. In: Shaw R, Soutter P, Stanton S, eds. Gynaecology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1992;437–447

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenzweig BA, Pushkin S, Blumenfield D, Bhatia NN. Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse.Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:539–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hertogs K, Stanton SL. Mechanism of urinary continence for colposuspension: barrier studies.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:1184–1188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatia NN, Bergman A, Gunning JE. Urodynamic effects of a vaginal pessary in women with stress urinary incontinence.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;147:876–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhatia NN, Bergman A. Pessary test in women with urinary incontinence.Obstet Gynecol 1995;65:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA. Predicting postoperative urinary incontinence development in women undergoing operation for genitourinary prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1171–1175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editorial Comment: All patients with significant uterovaginal prolapse require preoperative evaluation to rule out the presence of potential stress incontinence. The simplest and best way to perform this preoperatively has yet to be determined, although several methods have been described. These include a cough stress test or cough urethral profile performed with a full bladder with the prolapse reduced with a Sims' speculum, a pessary or vaginal packing. A pad test with the prolapse reduced in a similar fashion has also been used clinically to identify patients at risk for postoperactive potential stress incontinence following correction of pelvic prolapse. The authors present their experience using a ring pessary to reduce the prolapse during videourodynamic evaluation of lower urinary tract function, finding this technique to be effective in identifying patients who leak only with the pessary in place, and therefore, require an incontinence procedure. The pickup rate for this cohort of patients is similar to previous studies using alternative methods of detection. Perhaps the only question yet to be answered is the percentage of patients with negative testing preoperatively, yet who develop urinary incontinence immediately following surgical correction of pelvic relaxation. Only this determination will truly assess the clinical utility of the preoperative methods used to identify potential stress incontinence.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hextall, A., Boos, K., Cardozo, L. et al. Videocystourethrography with a ring pessary in situ. A clinically useful preoperative investigation for continent women with urogenital prolapse?. Int Urogynecol J 9, 205–209 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901605

Keywords

Navigation