Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Urethral pressure reflectometry (UPR) has proven highly reproducible in women with pelvic organ prolapse. We hypothesized that urethral parameters would decrease after anterior colporrhaphy.
Methods
A prospective, observational study where women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse ≥stage II were assessed before and after anterior colporrhaphy. Assessments consisted of prolapse staging according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, UPR measurements at rest, during squeezing and straining (at a standardized abdominal pressure of 50 cmH2O, PO-Abd 50), standardized stress tests with 300 ml saline, and answering the International Consultation on Incontinence – Urinary incontinence short form. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was defined as a positive stress test and a questionnaire with symptoms of SUI and a bother score > 1. Sample size was 30, power was 100% and the level of significance was 5%. We analyzed data with paired t-tests or non-parametric Wilcoxon signed rank tests; p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Twenty-eight women who underwent anterior colporrhaphy completed the study. PO-Abd 50 decreased 12 cmH2O after surgery (p < 0.0001). Five women developed postoperative SUI and one had persistent SUI; the six women’s preoperative PO-Abd 50 was lower than the rest (p < 0.01). If preoperative PO-Abd 50 was ≤65 cmH2O, the positive predictive value for postoperative SUI was 50%, and if PO-Abd 50 was ≥85 cmH2O, the negative predictive value was 100%.
Conclusions
The urethral closure mechanism deteriorates after anterior colporrhaphy. Using UPR, we can calculate a woman’s risk of SUI after anterior colporrhaphy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ellström Engh AM, Ekeryd A, Magnusson Å, et al. Can de novo stress incontinence after anterior wall repair be predicted? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:488–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01087.x.
Lensen EJM, Withagen MIJ, Kluivers KB, et al. Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:455–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22327.
Ennemoser S, Schönfeld M, von Bodungen V, et al. Clinical relevance of occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI) following vaginal prolapse surgery: long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecology J. 2012;23:851–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1765-4.
Kuribayashi M, Kitagawa Y, Narimoto K, et al. Predictor of de novo stress urinary incontinence following TVM procedure: a further analysis of preoperative voiding function. Int Urogynecology J. 2013;24:407–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1882-0.
Brubaker L, Cundiff GW, Fine P, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1557–66. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054208.
Marinkovic SP, Stanton SL. Incontinence and voiding difficulties associated with prolapse. J Urol. 2004;171:1021–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000111782.37383.e2.
Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecology J. 2016;27:165–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1.
Svenningsen R, Borstad E, Spydslaug AE, et al. Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecology J. 2012;23:843–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1764-5.
Visco AG, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy: the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE) randomized surgical trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:607–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0498-2.
Bump RC, Fantl JA, Hurt WG. The mechanism of urinary continence in women with severe uterovaginal prolapse: results of barrier studies. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:291–5.
Borstad E, Rud T. The risk of developing urinary stress-incontinence after vaginal repair in continent women. A clinical and urodynamic follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68:545–9.
Lau H-H, Huang W-C, Cheng Y-W, et al. Changes in urodynamic measurements and bladder neck position after single-incision trans-vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecology J. 2015;26:1629–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2753-2.
Weber AM. Is urethral pressure profilometry a useful diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence? Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56:720–35.
Klarskov N. Urethral pressure reflectometry. A method for simultaneous measurements of pressure and cross-sectional area in the female urethra. Dan Med J. 2012;59:B4412.
Klarskov N, Lose G. Urethral pressure reflectometry vs urethral pressure profilometry in women: a comparative study of reproducibility and accuracy. BJU Int. 2007;100:351–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06922.x.
Saaby M-L, Klarskov N, Lose G. Urethral pressure reflectometry during intra-abdominal pressure increase—an improved technique to characterize the urethral closure function in continent and stress urinary incontinent women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:1103–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22368.
Saaby M-L, Klarskov N, Lose G. The impact of tension-free vaginal tape on the urethral closure function: mechanism of action. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:50–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22513.
Khayyami Y, Lose G, Klarskov N. Urethral pressure reflectometry in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a study of reproducibility. Int Urogynecology J. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3187-1.
Tolstrup CK, Lose G, Klarskov N. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecology J. 2017;28:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3100-y.
Khayyami Y, Klarskov N, Lose G. The promise of urethral pressure reflectometry: an update. Int Urogynecology J. 2016;27:1449–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2964-1.
FDA Safety communication. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse; 2011.
van der Ploeg J, Oude Rengerink K, van der Steen A, et al. Transvaginal prolapse repair with or without the addition of a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a randomised trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122:1022–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13325.
Acknowledgements
We thank Nurse Berit Sejersen Larsen for her assistance with all examinations in this study.
Funding
The study was funded as a PhD scholarship by the University of Copenhagen. The University of Copenhagen was not involved in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
Y.K., G.L. and N.K. have received honoraria as investigators from Astellas. G.L. has also been a consultant for Contura.
Additional information
This paper was presented as an abstract at the Annual Meeting of International Continence Society in Tokyo, Japan, September 13th–16th, 2016, and as an abstract at the Nordic Urogynecological Association’s 30th Bi-Annual Meeting in Reykjavik, Iceland, April 27th–29th, 2017.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khayyami, Y., Lose, G. & Klarskov, N. The urethral closure mechanism is deteriorated after anterior colporrhaphy. Int Urogynecol J 29, 1311–1316 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3504-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3504-3