Skip to main content
Log in

Dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin: Pharmacokinetics, protein binding and serum bactericidal titers in healthy subjects after oral administration

Dicloxacillin und Flucloxacillin: Pharmakokinetik, Eiweißbindung und Serumbakterizidietiter nach oraler Applikation bei gesunden Probanden

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pharmacokinetics of dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin were studied in 12 healthy volunteers after oral administration. The participants received a single dose of either dicloxacillin (0.5 g, 0.75 g or 1.0 g) or flucloxacillin (0.75 g) in a cross-over fashion. Antibiotic concentrations were determined in serum and urine by bioassay and followed for 8 and 24 h, respectively. The three dicloxacillin dosages showed no significant differences for the serum elimination half-lives (t1/2β, median: 72 min). Comparing 0.75 g flucloxacillin with the same dose of dicloxacillin, no significant differences between the values of Cmax, t1/2β and AUC were found. Protein binding as determined by ultrafiltration in pooled serum was 94.7–96.2% for flucloxacillin and 96.4–97.2% for dicloxacillin. The serum bactericidal titers were similar for the two drugs. In conclusion, dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin showed similar pharmacokinetic behavior after 0.75 g doses in human volunteers.

Zusammenfassung

Bei 12 gesunden freiwilligen Probanden wurde die Pharmakokinetik von Dicloxacillin und Flucloxacillin nach oraler Gabe untersucht. Die Probanden erhielten eine Einzeldosis Dicloxacillin (0,5 g, 0,75 g oder 1,0 g) oder Flucloxacillin (0,75 g) im Überkreuz-Verfahren. Die Antibiotikakonzentrationen wurden im Serum und Urin über einen Zeitraum von 8 und 24 Stunden verfolgt und mittels Bioassay bestimmt. Die drei Dosierungen von Dicloxacillin ließen keine signifikanten Unterschiede in den Serum-Eliminations-Halbwertzeiten (t1/2β; median 72 min) erkennen. Der Vergleich der 0,75 g Dosis von Flucloxacillin mit derselben Dosis von Dicloxacillin zeigte keine signifikanten Unterschiede für die Werte Cmax, t1/2β und AUC. Die Eiweißbindung wurde durch Ultrafiltration in gepoolten Seren mit 94,7–96,2% für Flucloxacillin und von 96,4–97,2% für Dicloxacillin ermittelt. Beide Medikamente zeigten ähnliche Serumbakterizidietiter. Dicloxacillin wies folglich nach Gabe von 0,75 g bei Probanden ähnliche pharmakokinetische Eigenschaften auf wie Flucloxacillin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hedström, S. Å, Svärd, R. Ny dosering av flukloxacillin förenklar terapi vid hud- och mjukdelsinfektioner. Läkartidn 89 (1992) 2669–2670. (In Swedish).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Craig, W. A., Suh, B. Protein binding and the antimicrobial effects: methods for determination of protein binding. In:Lorian, V. (ed.): Antibiotics in laboratory medicine, 2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore 1986, pp. 500–504.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenblatt, J. E., Kind, A. C., Brodie, J. L., Kirby, W. M. M. Mechanisms responsible for the blood level differences of isoxazolyl penicillins oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin. Arch. Int. Med. 121 (1968) 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nauta, E. J., Mattie, H. Dicloxacillin and cloxacillin: pharmacokinetics in healthy and hemodialysis subjects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 20 (1976) 98–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Löfgren, S., Bucht, G., Hermansson, B., Holm, S. E., Winblad, B., Norrby, S. R. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of dicloxacillin in healthy subjects of young and old age. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 18 (1986) 365–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergan, T. Pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 42 (1984) 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bennett, J. V., Gravenkemper, C. F., Brodie, J. L., Kirby, W. M. M. Dicloxacillin, a new antibiotic: clinical studies and laboratory comparisons with oxacillin and cloxacillin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 4 (1964) 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hammerstrom, C. F., Cox, F., McHenry, M. C., Quinn, E. L. Clinical, laboratory, and pharmacological studies of dicloxacillin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 6 (1966) 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bodey, G. P., Vallejos, C., Stewart, D. Flucloxacillin: a new semisynthetic isoxazolyl penicillin. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 13 (1972) 512–515.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Felice, E. A. Serum levels, urinary recovery, and safety of dicloxacillin, a new semisynthetic penicillin, in normal volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 7 (1967) 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nauta, E. H., Mattie, H. Pharmacokinetics of flucloxacillin and cloxacillin in healthy subjects and patients on chronic intermittent haemodialysis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2 (1975) 111–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutherland, R., Croyden, E. A. P., Rolinson, G. N. Flucloxacillin, a new isoxazolyl penicillin, compared with oxacillin, cloxacillin and dicloxacillin. Br. Med. J. 2 (1970) 455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pacifici, G. M., Viani, A., Taddeucci-Brunelli, G., Rizzo, G., Carrai, M. Plasma protein binding of dicloxacillin: effects of age and diseases. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 25 (1987) 622–626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Røder, B.L., Frimodt-Møller, N., Espersen, F. et al. Dicloxacillin and flucloxacillin: Pharmacokinetics, protein binding and serum bactericidal titers in healthy subjects after oral administration. Infection 23, 107–112 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833876

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833876

Keywords

Navigation