Skip to main content
Log in

Auctioning Böhm-Bawerk's horses

  • Papers
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Auctions are a unique allocating device of great practical importance. They present situations that cannot easily be fit into the neat taxonomy of Neoclassical Economic Analysis. For instance, textbook theory tells us that a market with one seller and many buyers is a monopolistic market structure. But what if the seller is passive as he is in the Auction? Does this situation still qualify as a monopolistic situation with all of the typical connotations that that term implies? Obviously not. In addition, our textbooks tell us that price discrimination is the result of the profit maximizing behavior of monopolies. However, we have seen that buyers in a competitive bidding process can very naturally discriminate the price of the good they are bidding for on their own. Is a single price for a homogeneous good then still evidence of a “competitive” process?

These questions and several others were raised in this paper and, I hope, dealt with in a satisfactory manner. The point that must be stressed, however, is that the auctioning process is an extremeley complex subject, and in light of its empirical significance, must be met with far more analysis than economists have offered in the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E.von: Interest and Capital, 1888, South Holland 1959.

  • Cassady, R.: Auctions and Auctioneering, Berkeley 1967.

  • Cook, P.: Fact and Fancy on Identical Bids, Harvard Business Review,41, No. 1, 67–72, Jan.–Feb. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G.: Linear Programming and Extensions, Princeton 1963.

  • Edgeworth, F. Y.: Mathematical Psychics, London 1881.

  • Farquharson, R.: Theory of Voting, New Haven 1969.

  • Granger, C., and O.Morgenstern: Predictability of Stock Market Prices, Lexington 1970.

  • Menger, C.: Principles of Economics, 1871, Glencoe 1950.

  • Moore, E. H.: A Generalization of a Game Called Nim, Annals of Mathematics,11, 93, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern, O.: Demand Theory Reconsidered, Quarterly Journal of Economics,62, 165–201, February 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Th.: The Strategy of Conflict, Oxford 1970.

  • Schwödiauer, G.: A Glossary of Game Theoretical Terms, Working Paper, No. 1, Department of Economics, New York 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schotter, A.: Core Allocations and Competitive Equilibria — A Survey, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie,33, 281–313, 1973a.

    Google Scholar 

  • -: Three Essays on the Theory of Allocating books by Bidding and Auctioning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Economics, October 1973b.

  • Shapley, L., andM. Shubik: The Assignment Came I; The Core, International Journal of Game Theory1. 111–130, 1971/1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M.: The Dollar Auction: A Paradox in Non-Cooperative Behavior and Escalation, Journal of Conflict Resolution, March 1971.

  • —: On different Methods of Allocating Resources, Kyklos,23, Fasc., 2, 332–337, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M., andJ. M. Griesmer: Toward A Study of Bidding Processes, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,10, No. 1, 11–21, March 1963a.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Toward a Study of Bidding Processes, Part 2 — Games with Capacity Limitations, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly,10, No. 2, 151–173, June 1963b.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Toward a Study of Bidding Processes, Part 3 — Some Special Models, Naval Research Logistics Quartely,10, No. 3, 199–217, Sept. 1963c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik, M., and B.Levitan: Toward a Study of Bidding Processes, Part 4 — Games with Unknown Costs, Naval Research Logistics Quartely,14, No. 4, December 1967.

  • Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders, Journal of Finance,16, 8–37, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O.Morgenstern: The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, New York 1947.

  • Yamey, B. S.: Whyf2,310,000 for a Velazquez?: An Auction Bidding Role, Journal of Political Economy,80, No. 6, 1323–1327, November/December 1972.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper was funded by a grant given to the Department of Economics at New York University by the Office of Naval Research. I would like to thank ProfessorOskar Morgenstern for his many helpful comments and for posing this problem to me. I, of course, am responsible for any of the errors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schotter, A. Auctioning Böhm-Bawerk's horses. Int J Game Theory 3, 195–215 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01766875

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01766875

Keywords

Navigation