Skip to main content
Log in

On the accuracy of shape sensitivity

  • Originals
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The calculation of sensitivity of the response of a structure modeled by finite elements to shape variation is known to be subject to numerical difficulties. The accuracy of a given method is typically measured against the yard stick of finite-difference sensitivity calculation. The present paper demonstrates with a simple example that this approach may be flawed because of discretization errors associated with the finite element mesh. Seven methods for calculating sensitivity derivatives are compared for a two-material beam problem with a moving interface. It is found that as the mesh is refined, displacement sensitivity derivatives converge more slowly than the displacements. Six of the methods agree fairly well, but the adjoint variational surface method provides substantially different results. However, the difference is found to reflect convergence from another direction to the same answer rather than reduced accuracy. Additionally, it is observed that small derivatives are particularly prone to accuracy problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelman, H.M.; Haftka, R.T. 1986: Sensitivity analysis for discrete structural systems.AIAA J. 24, 823–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, B.; Chon, C.T.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Accuracy problems associated with semi-analytical derivatives of static response.Finite elements in analysis and design 4, 249–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthelemy, B.; Haftka, R.T. 1988: Accuracy problems of the semi-analytical method for shape sensitivity calculations of beam-like structures. Paper 88–2284,Proc. AIAA 29th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf. (held in Williamsburg, VA, April 18–20)

  • Choi, K.K.; Seong, H.G. 1986: A domain method for shape design sensitivity analysis of built-up structures.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 57, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dems, K.; Mróz, Z. 1986: On a class of conservation rules associated with sensitivity analyisis in linear elasticity.Int. J. Solids Struct. 22, 737–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Dems, K.; Haftka, R.T. 1989: Two approaches to sensitivity analysis for shape variation in structures.Mech. Struct. Mach. 16, 465–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R.T.; Grandhi, R.V. 1986: Structural shape optimization- a survey.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 57, 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Haftka, R.T.; Adelman, H.M. 1989: Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis.Struct. Optim. 1, 137–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J.H.; Saigal, S. 1988: Design sensitivity analysis of solids using BEM.J. Eng. Mech. 114, 1703–1722

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandridge, C.A.; Haftka, R.T. 1987: Accuracy of derivatives of control performance using a reduced structural model.Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS 28th Structures, Structural Dynamics and Material Conf. and AIAA Dynamics and Material Conf. and AIAA Dynamics Specialist Conf. Part 2B, 622–628

  • Yang, R.J. 1989: A three-dimensional shape optimization system Shop3D.Comp. Struct. 31, 881–890

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. Sobieski

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haftka, R.T., Barthelemy, B. On the accuracy of shape sensitivity. Structural Optimization 3, 1–6 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743484

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01743484

Keywords

Navigation