Skip to main content
Log in

Conditions on social choice functions

  • Articles
  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

It might be tempting to view this paper simply as a compilation and collection of the conditions in the social choice literature and an orderly presentation of the relationships among these conditions. While we think that this alone would make it useful we hope this paper will serve as more than a reference guide, that it will also help systematize research in various areas.

It would be interesting, for example, to take each subgroup of the rationality conditions and determine what impossibility results can be obtained when each of the conditions in the subgroup is substituted for the traditional TR, QTR and AR conditions. It would then be possible to develop an overall picture of the structure and robustness of the impossibility results for each subgroup of conditions and hence for all the rationality conditions.

We would also hope that this paper would stimulate some discussion of the fairness and reasonableness of the conditions presented here. Many of the conditions covered above are, we believe, neither fair nor reasonable. Achievement of some consensus as to what constitute meaningful requirements for a social choice function would help provide a more common direction for social choice research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. “Rational Choice Functions and Orderings,”Economica, 26 (1959), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——.Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1963 (2nd edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. H., G. Bordes, J. S. Kelly and K. Suzumura. “Impossibility Theorems Without Collective Rationality,”Jour. Econ. Theory 13(1976), 361–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Julian. “The Existence of Social Welfare Functions,”Econometrica 25 (1957), 302–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “A Direct Proof of Arrow's Theorem,”Econometrica, 40 (1972), 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, Stefan. “A Social Choice Interpretation of the Von-Neumann Morgenstern Game,”Econometrica, 44 (1976), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, Georges. “Consistency, Rationality and Collective Choice,”Rev. Econ. Stud. 53(1976), 451–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Donald. “Aggregation of Preferences,”Quart. Jour. Econ. 89 (1975), 456–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. “Acyclic Aggregation over Finite Sets of Alternatives,”Rev. Econ. Stud., forthcoming (1976).

  • Chernoff, Herman. “Rational Selection of Decision Functions,”Econometrica, 22 (1954), 422–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, Marquis de.Essai sur l'Application de l'Analyse à la Probabilité des Dècsions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix, Paris 1785.

  • Ferejohn, John and Grether, David. “Regular Choice and Power Structure,” mimeographed, California Institute of Technology, 1975.

  • ——. “Weak Path Independence,”Jour. Econ. Theory 14(1977), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. and Fine, K. “Social Choice and Individual Ranking I,”Rev. Econ. Stud., 41 (1974a), 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Social Choice and Individual Ranking II,”Rev. Econ. Stud. 41 (1974b), 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, Peter C. “A Comparative Analysis of Group Decision Methods,”Beh. Sci. 16 (1971), 538–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Even Chance Lotteries in Social Choice Theory,”Theory and Decision, 3 (1972), 18–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——.The Theory of Social Choice. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Social Choice Functions,”SIAM Rev. 16 (1974a), 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Subset Choice Conditions and the Computation of Social Choice Sets,”Quart. Jour. Econ. 88 (1974b), 320–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan. “Social Choice and the Arrow Conditions,” unpublished paper, University of Pittsburgh, 1969.

  • Hansson, Bengt. “Choice Structures and Preference Relations,”Synthese 18 (1968), 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Voting and Group Decision Functions,”Synthese 20 (1969), 526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “The Independence Condition in the Theory of Social Choice,”Theory and Decision, 4 (1973), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. “The Existence of Group Preference Functions,”Public Choice, XXVII, Winter (1976).

  • Herzberger, Hans. “Ordinal Preference and Rational Choice,”Econometrica 41 (1973), 187–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., and Sonnenschein, H. “General Possibility Theorems for Group Decisions,”Rev. Econ. Stud. 39 (1972), 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Kenneth. “A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision,”Econometrica, 20 (1952), 680–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. “Some Equivalences Among Path Independence Axioms,” mimeographed, California Institute of Technology, 1973.

  • Parks, Robert.Rationalizations, Extensions, and Social Choice Paths, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, 1971.

  • --. “Further Results on Path Independence, Quasi-Transitivity and Social Choice,”Public Choice, XXV, Summer (1976).

  • Plott, Charles R. “Recent Results in the Theory of Voting,”Frontiers in Quantitative Economics. Edited by Michael Intrilligator. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Ethics, Social Choice Theory and the Theory of Economic Policy,”Jour. Math. Soc. 2 (1972), 181–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Path Independence, Rationality and Social Choice,”Econometrica, 41 (1973), 1075–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. “Rationality and Relevance in Social Choice Theory,”Amer. Econ. Rev., forthcoming a.

  • --. “On Game Solutions and Revealed Preference Theory,”Jour. Econ. Theory,, forthcoming b.

  • Richelson, Jeffrey. “A Comparative Analysis of Social Choice Functions,”Beh. Sci. 20 (1975), 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, Marcel K. “Revealed Preference Theory,”Econometrica, 34 (1966), 635–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Rational Choice,”Preferences, Utility and Demand. Edited by J. S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter and H. F. Sonnenschein. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Thomas. “Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum,”Nous 6(1972), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. “Quasi-Transitivity, Rational Choice and Collective Decisions,”Rev. Econ. Stud. 36 (1969), 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • .Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • . “Choice Functions and Revealed Preference,”Rev. Econ. Stud. 38 (1971), 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination,”Econometrica 45(1977), 53–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and Pattanaik, P.K. “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Rational Choice Under Majority Rule,”Jour. Econ. Theory 1 (1969), 178–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, John H. “Aggregation of Preferences With Variable Electorate,”Econometrica, 41 (1973), 1027–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. “Note on Preference and Axioms of Choice,”Annals of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 8 (1956), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1947. 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Robert. “The Finer Structure of Revealed Preference,”Jour. Econ. Theory 2 (1970), 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. “The Game-Theoretic Structure of Arrow's General Possibility Theorem,”Jour. Econ. Theory 5 (1972), 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. P. “An Axiomatization of the Borda Rule,”Jour. Econ. Theory 9 (1974), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • --. “Social Choice Scoring Functions,”SIAM Jour. Appl. Math., 28 (1975).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author benefited from conservations with Thomas Schwartz, John Frejohn and Charles Plott. Any remaining errors are the responsibility of the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richelson, J. Conditions on social choice functions. Public Choice 31, 79–110 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718975

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718975

Keywords

Navigation