Abstract
Forty-five patients with soiling but without faecal incontinence were evaluated by means of anorectal function investigations (anal manometry, rectal capacity and saline infusion test). The causes of soiling and the effect of treatment on both soiling and anorectal function were studied. The results were compared with a control group of 161 patients without soiling or incontinence. The diagnoses were haemorrhoids (10), mucosal prolapse (7), rectal prolapse (6), fistulae (5), proctitis (3), faecal impaction (2), rectocele with intussusception (2), scars after fistulectomy (2) and others (8). Simple inspection and proctoscopy were generally sufficient to establish a diagnosis. For two patients the diagnosis rectocele was made after defaecography. Anorectal test results did not differ between the soiling and control group, did not contribute to establish a diagnosis and did not change after treatment. Only patients with a rectal prolapse had abnormal results in anorectal function tests: a low basal sphincter pressure and a limited continence reserve. Appropriate therapy resulted in complete recovery (44%) or improvement of symptoms (29%).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Read NW, Harford WV, Schmulen AC, Read MG, Santa Ana C, Fordtran JS (1979) A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhoea. Gastroenterology 76:747–756
Matheson DM, Keighley MRB (1981) Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Gut 22:126–129
Loening-Baucke V, Anuras S (1985) Effects of age and sex on anorectal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 80:50–53
McHugh SM, Diamand NE (1987) Effect of age, gender and parity on anal canal pressures. Dig Dis Sci 32:726–736
Drossman DA, Sandler RS, Broom CM, McKee DC (1986) Urgency and fecal soiling in people with bowel dysfunction. Dig Dis Sci 31:1221–1225
Cucchiara S, Coremans G, Staiano A, Corazziari E, Romaniello G, Di Lorenzo C, Tamburrini O, Auricehio S (1984) Gastrointestinal transit time and anorectal manometry in children with fecal soiling. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 3:545–550
Read MG, Read NW, Haynes WG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG (1982) A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and faecal continence. Br J Surg 60:396–398
Schoetz DJ, Veidenheimer MC (1985) Rectal prolapse. In: Henry MM, Swash M (eds) Coloproctology and the pelvic floor. Butterworth, London, pp 303–307
Saino P (1985) A manometric study of anorectal function after surgery for anal fistulae, with special reference to incontinence. Acta Chir Scand 151:695–700
Hsu TC, MacKeigan JM (1984) Surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure. Dis Colon Rectum 27:475–478
Kiff ES, Swash M (1984) Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerve in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 71:614–616
Bartolo DCC, Sarnet JA, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Read NW (1983) The role of partial denervation of the puborectalis in idiopathic faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 70:664–667
Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM (1985) Abnormalities in central and peripheral nerve conduction in patients with anorectal incontinence. J R Soc Med 78:294–300
Read NW, Abouzekry L (1986) Why do patients with faecal impaction have faecal incontinence? Gut 27:283–287
Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H (1977) Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 18:656–665
Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M, Auvinen O, Hiltunen P (1986) Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 151:489–492
Kuypers JHC (1986) Stoornissen in de continentie voor faeces. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 130:1840–1844
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Felt-Bersma, R.J.F., Janssen, J.J.W.M., Klinkenberg-Knol, E.C. et al. Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment. Int J Colorect Dis 4, 37–40 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648548
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01648548