Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

We consider the following statistical problem: suppose we have a light beam and a collection of semi-transparent windows which can be placed in the way of the beam. Assume that we are colour blind and we do not possess any colour sensitive detector. The question is, whether by only measurements of the decrease in the beam intensity in various sequences of windows we can recognize which among our windows are light beam filters absorbing photons according to certain definite rules?

To answer this question a definition of physical systems is formulated independent of “quantum logic” and lattice theory, and a new idea of quantization is proposed. An operational definition of filters is given: in the framework of this definition certain nonorthodox classes of filters are admissible with a geometry incompatible to that assumed in orthodox quantum mechanics. This leads to an extension of the existing quantum mechanical structure generalizing the schemes proposed by Ludwig [10] and the present author [13]. In the resulting theory, the quantum world of orthodox quantum mechanics is not the only possible but is a special member of a vast family of “quantum worlds” mathematically admissible. An approximate classification of these worlds is given, and their possible relation to the quantization of non-linear fields is discussed. It turns out to be obvious that the convex set theory has a similar significance for quantum physics as the Riemannian geometry for space-time physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bergman, P. G.: The general theory of relativity — case study in the unfolding of of new physical concepts. Problems in the Philosophy of Science, p. 249. Amsterdam: North Holland Publ. Co. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birkhoff, G., and J. von Neumann: Ann. Math.37, 823 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dähn, G.: Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories (IV). Commun. Math. Phys.9, 192 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Finkelstein, D.: The logic of quantum physics, N. Y. Acad. Sci.1963, 621;

  5. -- The physics of logic. Preprint IC/68/35 (Triest, 1968).

  6. Finkelstein, D., J. M. Jauch, S. Schimonovich, and D. Speiser: Foundations of quaternionic quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys.3, 207 (1962); — Some physical consequences of generalQ-covariance. J. Math. Phys.4, 788 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gunson, J.: Structure of quantum mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys.6, 262 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haag, R.: Lectures on axiomatic quantum mechanics. 1960 (unpublished).

  9. Haag, R., and D. Kastler: An algebraic approach to quantum field theory. J. Math. Phys.5, 848 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan, P.: Über das Verhältnis der Theorie der Elementarlänge zur Quantentheorie. Commun. Math. Phys.9, 279 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ludwig, G.: Versuch einer axiomatischen Grundlegung der Quantenmechanik und allgemeinerer physikalischer Theorien. Z. Physik181, 233 (1964);

    Google Scholar 

  12. —— Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories (II). Commun. Math. Phys.4, 331 (1967); (III) Commun. Math. Phys.9, 1 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Landsberg, P. T.: A proof of Temple's laws of transition. Ann. Phys.6, 14 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mackey, G. W.: The mathematics foundations of quantum mechanics. New York: W. A. Benjamin, Inc. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mielnik, B.: Geometry of quantum states. Commun. Math. Phys.9, 55 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Piron, C.: Axiomatique quantique. Helv. Phys. Acta37, 439 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Plymen, R. J.: A modification of Piron's axioms. Helv. Phys. Acta41, 69 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pool, J. C. T.: Baer *-semigroup and the logic of quantum mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys.9, 118 (1968);

    Google Scholar 

  19. —— Semimodularity and the logic of quantum mechanics. Commun. Math. Phys.9, 212 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Śniatycki, J.: On the geometric structure of classical field theory in Lagrangian formulation. Preprint, Dept. of Appl. Math. and Comp. Sc. Sheffield University (1969).

  21. Trautman, A.: Noether equations and conservation laws. Commun. Math. Phys.6, 248 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Temple, G.: The general principles of quantum theory. London: Methuen 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tulczyjew, W.: Seminar on phase space theory. Warsaw, 1968 (unpublished).

  24. Woronowicz, St.: Lectures on the axiomatic quantum field theory. Warsaw, 1968 (to be published).

  25. Zierler, N., and M. Schlessinger: Boolean embeddings of orthomodular sets and quantum logic. Duke Math. J.32, 251 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mielnik, B. Theory of filters. Commun.Math. Phys. 15, 1–46 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645423

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645423

Keywords

Navigation