Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone fractures depend not only on bone density, but also on bone quality. Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a technique for evaluating skeletal status. Speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) are the US properties currently used to assess bone strength and fragility. In 304 postmenopausal women (age 58.8±5.5 years) we measured: bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), SOS, BUA and Stiffness in the os calcis (using an Achilles machine). In all subjects we performed lateral lumbar and thoracic radiographs. Morphometric parameters were derived by measuring the anterior, middle and posterior height of each vertebral body, to obtain a semiquantitative grading of vertebral fractures as follows: 0, no vertebral deformity; 1, any vertebral height reduced between 20% and 25%; 2, any vertebral height reduced between 25% and 40%; 3, any vertebral height reduced more than 40%. On the basis of the number and severity of vertebral deformities the women were divided into: group 1 (n=79), normal; group 2(n=80), mild; group 3 (n=85), moderate; and group 4 (n=60), severe. Mean values of SOS, BUA, Stiffness and BMD were significantly lower (p<0.001) in women with vertebral deformity than in normals. In the whole population SOS, BUA and Stiffness values were significantly correlated with BMD. SOS, BUA and Stiffness values were significantly decreased (p<0.001) with vertebral deformity, as was BMD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed BMD to be slightly better than Stiffness in discriminating among groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that BMD, BUA, SOS and Stiffness were independent predictors of vertebral fracture risk. Ultrasound parameters were still significant independent predictors of vertebral fracture even after adjusting for BMD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Browner W, Cauley J, Ensrud K, et al. Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures research group. Lancet 1993;341:72–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hui SL, Slemenda CV, Johnston CC. Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study. J Clin Invest 1988;81:1804–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR. Are patients with fractures more osteoporotic? Reviews of the evidence. Am J Med 1985;78:487–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ott SM, Kilcoyne RF, Chesnut CH III. Comparisons among methods of measuring bone mass and relationships to severity of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988;66:501–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper C, Aihie A. Osteoporosis: recent advances in pathogene-sis and treatment. Q. J Med 1994;87:203–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Genant HK, Gluer CC, Lotz JC. Gender differences in bone density, skeletal geometry and fracture biomechanics. Radiology 1994;190:636–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parfitt AM. Implications of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fracture. Bone 1992;13:41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ross PD, Davis JW, Vogel JM, Wasnich RD. A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1990;46:149–61.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gluer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M. Goldstein SA, Genant HK. Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 1994 ; 55:46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Biot MD. Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative media. J Acoust Soc Am 1962;34:1254–64.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Langton CM, Palmer SB, Porter RW. The measurement of broadband ultrasound attenuation in cancellous bone. Eng Med 1984;13:89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Langton CM, Evans GP, Hodgskinson R, Riggs CM. Ultrasonic, elastic and structural properties of cancellous bone. In: Ring EFG, editor. Current research in osteoporosis and bone mineral measurement. London: British Institute of Radiology, 1990:10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Camporeale A, Cepollaro C, Zacchei F, Montagnani M, Agnusdei D, Gennari C. Ultrasound transmission velocity in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women. In: Christiansen C, Overgaard K, editors. Osteoporosis 90. Copenhagen: Osteopress ApS, 1990:670–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lehmann R, Wapniarz M, Kvasnicka M, Klein K, Anoio B. Velocity of ultrasound at the patella: influence of age, menopause and estrogen replacement therapy. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:308–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Waud CE, Lew R, Baran DT. The relationship between ultrasound and densitometric measurements of bone mass at the calcaneous in women. Calcif Tissue Int 1992;51:415–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herd RJM, Ramalingham T, Ryan PJ, Fogelman I, Blake GM. Measurements of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in the calcaneus in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1992;2:247–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Young H, Howey S, Purdie W. Broadband ultrasound attenuation compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in screening for postmenopausal low bone density. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:160–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yamada M, Ito M, Hayashi K, Nakamura T. Calcaneus as a site for assessment of bone mineral density: evaluation in cadavers and healthy volunteers. AJR 1993;161:621–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Vogel JM. Detection of fracture spinal osteoporosis using bone mineral absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 1988;3:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Agren M, Karellas A, Leahey D, Marks S, Baran D. Ultrasound attenuation at the calcaneus: a sensitive and specific discriminator of osteopenia in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;48:240–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baran DT, Kelly AM, Karellas A, Gionet M, Price M, Leahey D, et al. Ultrasound attenuation of the os calcis in women with osteoporosis and hip fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1988;43:138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Massie A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:107–10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Faulkner KG, McClung MR, Coleman LJ, Kingston-Sandahl E. Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites. Osteoporosis Int 1994;4:42–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lees B, Stevenson JC. Preliminary evaluation of a new ultrasound bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 1993;53:149–52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Stewart A, Reid DM, Porter RW. Broadband ultrasound attenuation and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with hip fractures: which technique discriminates fracture risk? Calcif Tissue Int 1994;54:466–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Genant HK, Stone K. Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:353–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schott AM, Weill-Engerer S, Hans D, Duboeuf D, Delmas PD, Meunier PJ. Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:243–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Turner CH, Peacock M, Timmerman L, Neal JM, Johnston CC. Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass. Osteoporosis Int 1995;5:130–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heaney RP, Avioli LV, Chesnut CH III, Lappe J, Recker RR, Brandenburger GH. Ultrasound velocity through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10:341–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cepollaro C, Zacchei F, Borracelli D, Palmieri R, Gonnelli S, Agnusdei D, Gennari C. Precision of new ultrasound bone densitometers: correlation with absorptiometry methods. In: Proceedings of ultrasonic assessment of bone II, 23 June 1992, p. 19.

  31. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same case. Radiology 1983;148:839–43.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Porter RW, Miller CG, Grainger D, Palmer SB. Prediction of hip fractures in elderly women: a prospective study. BMJ 1990;301:638–41.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eastell R, Cedel SL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL, Melton JM III. Classification of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:207–15.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Melton LJ III, Kan SH, Frye MA, Wahner HW, O'Fallon WM, Riggs BL. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:1000–11.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Minne HW, Leidig G, Wuster C. A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 1988;3:335–49.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hedlund LR, Gallagher JC. Vertebral morphometry in diagnosis of spinal fractures. Bone Miner 1988;5:59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 1993;8:1137–48.

    Google Scholar 

  39. McCloskey EV, Spector TD, Eyres KS, Fern ED, O'Rourke N, Vasikaran S, Kanis JA. The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials. Osteoporosis Int 1993;3:138–47.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Smith-Bidman R, Cummings SR, Steiger P, Genant HK. A comparison of morphometric definitions of vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:25–34.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Statistics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy

    S. Rossi

  2. Institute of Internal Medicine, University of Siena, Nuovo Policlinico Viale Bracci, I-53100, Siena, Italy

    S. Gonnelli MD, C. Cepollaro, D. Agnusdei, R. Palmieri & C. Gennari

Authors
  1. S. Gonnelli MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Cepollaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Agnusdei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Palmieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C. Gennari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gonnelli, S., Cepollaro, C., Agnusdei, D. et al. Diagnostic value of ultrasound analysis and bone densitometry as predictors of vertebral deformity in postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int 5, 413–418 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01626601

Keywords

Search

Navigation