Skip to main content
Log in

Oscillation amplitudes of the Shubnikov-dehaas effect

  • Published:
Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B Aims and scope

Conclusions

The two-band model described here, based on the parabolic dispersion law and elastic scattering approximation is capable to explain many aspects of the Shubnikovde Haas effect, although the elastic scattering approximation is not suitable for ail experiments mentioned.

We have satisfactorily explained the phase shift between oscillations of different components of the resistivity tensor. The oscillation amplitude of the longitudinal magnetoresistance Bi can also be well fitted. These effects have been interpreted by authors of the experiments [2, 3] in another way, based on the assumption of dominant contribution of inter-level scattering. They obtain a worse fit and also their Dingle temperatureT D=15 K is less realistic thanT D=3 K suitable for the fitting presented in section 5b of this paper.

It has also been shown that the oscillation amplitude of the transverse and nondiagonal (Hall) components of the resistivity is strongly affected by the difference between the numbers of electrons and holes. This effect might also be responsible for the large enhancement of the oscillation amplitude due to alloying in Bi, doped with Sb [1], as in available samples the precise compensation is usually not achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hiruma K., Kido G., Kawauchi K., Miura N.: Solid State Commun.33 (1980) 257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tanuma S., Inada R.: Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. (Japan)57 (1975) 231.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tanuma S., Inada R.: Phys. Condensed Matter19 (1975) 95.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogod Yu. A., Krasovitsky V. B.: Solid State Commun.28 (1978) 659.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Toyoda K.: J. Phys. Soc. Japan38 (1975) 1543.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sondheimer E. H.: Proc. Phys. Soc. London A65 (1952) 561.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Středa P., Smrčka L.: Czech. J. Phys. B31 (1981) 1114.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen A., Weisz G., Sher A.: Phys. Rev. B5 (1972) 2897.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harrison W. A.: Teoriya tverdovo tela, Mir, Moskva, 1972, p. 436.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sham L. J., Ziman J. M.: Solid State Phys.15, (1963) 221.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka S., Morita T.: Prog. Theor. Phys.47 (1972) 378.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smrčka L., Středa P.: J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.10 (1977) 2153.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roth L. M., Argyres P. N.: Semiconductors and Semimetals 1 (ed. R. K. Willardson and A. C. Beer), Academic Press, New York, 1966, p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen J. L.: Electron Transport in Metals, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1962, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Giriat W.: Phys. Lett.24A (1967) 515.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hartman R.: Phys. Rev.181 (1969) 1070.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Středa, P. Oscillation amplitudes of the Shubnikov-dehaas effect. Czech J Phys 33, 49–64 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597337

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01597337

Keywords

Navigation