Skip to main content
Log in

Concave extensions for nonlinear 0–1 maximization problems

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

A well-known linearization technique for nonlinear 0–1 maximization problems can be viewed as extending any polynomial in 0–1 variables to a concave function defined on [0, 1]n. Some properties of this “standard” concave extension are investigated. Polynomials for which the standard extension coincides with the concave envelope are characterized in terms of integrality of a certain polyhedron or balancedness of a certain matrix. The standard extension is proved to be identical to another type of concave extension, defined as the lower envelope of a class of affine functions majorizing the given polynomial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.P. Adams and P.M. Dearing, “On the equivalence between roof duality and Lagrangian duality for unconstrained 0–1 quadratic programming problems,” Technical Report URI-061, Clemson University (Clemson, SC, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Balas, Notes of the three lectures given at Cornell University in the distinguished lecturer series, GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University, (Pittsburgh, PA, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Balas and J.B. Mazzola. “Nonlinear 0–1 programming: I. Linearization techniques,”Mathematical Programming 30 (1984) 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Conforti, G. Cornuejols and M.R. Rao, “Balanced 0–1 matrices: a recognition algorithm,” Paper presented atthe 14th International Symposium on Mathematical Programming, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1991).

  5. Y. Crama, “Linearization techniques and concave extensions in nonlinear 0–1 optimization,” RUTCOR Research Report 32-88, Rutgers University, (New Brunswick, NJ, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Crama, “Recognition problems for special classes of polynomials in 0–1 variables,”Mathematical Programming 44 (1989) 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Crama, P. Hansen and B. Jaumard, “The basic algorithm for pseudo-Boolean programming revisited,”Discrete Applied Mathematics 29 (1990) 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.E. Falk and K.R. Hoffman, “A successive underestimation method for concave minimization problems,”Mathematics of Operations Research 1 (1976) 251–259.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Fortet, “Applications de l'algèbre de Boole en recherche opérationelle,”Revue Française de Recherche Opérationelle 4 (1960) 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Glover and E. Woolsey, “Converting the 0–1 polynomial programming problem to a 0–1 linear program,”Operations Research 22 (1974) 180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Granot and F. Granot, “Generalized covering relaxation for 0–1 programs,”Operations Research 28 (1980) 1442–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Granot and P.L. Hammer, “On the role of generalized covering problems,”Cahiers du Centre d'Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle 16 (1974) 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.L. Hammer, P. Hansen and B. Simeone, “Roof duality, complementation and persistency in quadratic 0–1 optimization,”Mathematical Programming 28 (1984) 121–155.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.L. Hammer and B. Kalantari, “A bound on the roof duality gap,” in: B. Simeone, ed.,Combinatorial Optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 1403 (Springer, Berlin, 1989) pp. 254–257.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P.L. Hammer and I.G. Rosenberg, “Linear decomposition of a positive group-Boolean function,” in: L. Collatz and W. Wetterling, eds.,Numerische Methoden bei Optimierung, Vol. II (Birkhauser, Basel, 1974) pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.L. Hammer and A.A. Rubin, “Some remarks on quadratic programming with 0–1 variables,”Revue Française de Recherche Opérationelle et d'Informatique 4 (1970) 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P.L. Hammer and S. Rudeanu,Boolean Methods in Operations Research and Related Areas (Springer, Berlin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P.L. Hammer and B. Simeone, “Quadratic functions of binary variables,” in: B. Simeone, ed.,Combinatorial Optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, No. 1403, (Springer, Berlin, 1989) pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Hansen, “Methods of nonlinear 0–1 programming,”Annals of Discrete Mathematics 5 (1979) 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Hansen, S.H. Lu and B. Simeone, “On the equivalence of paved-duality and standard linearization in nonlinear 0–1 optimization,”Discrete Applied Mathematics 29 (1990) 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Hansen and B. Simeone, “Unimodular functions,”Discrete Applied Mathematics 14 (1986) 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.M. Karp, “Reducibility among combinatorial problems,” in: R.E. Miller and J.W. Thatcher, eds.,Complexity of Computer Computations, (Plenum Press, New York, 1972) pp. 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Lovász,An Algorithmic Theory of Numbers, Graphs and Convexity (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.H. Lu and A.C. Williams, “Roof duality for polynomial 0–1 optimization,”Mathematical Programming 37 (1987) 357–360.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S.H. Lu and A.C. Williams, “Roof duality and linear relaxation for quadratic and polynomial 0–1 optimization,” RUTCOR Research Report 8-87, Rutgers University, (New Brunswick, NJ, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. R.T. Rockafellar,Convex Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Schrijver,Theory of Linear and Integer Programming (Wiley, Chichester, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. Singer, “Extensions of functions of 0–1 variables and applications to combinatorial optimization,”Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization 7 (1984–85) 23–62.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Truemper, “Alpha-balanced graphs and matrices and GF(3)-representability of matroids,”Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B 32 (1982) 112–139.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crama, Y. Concave extensions for nonlinear 0–1 maximization problems. Mathematical Programming 61, 53–60 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582138

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01582138

Key words

Navigation