Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legitimizing university governance: Theory and practice

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts a theoretically based articulation of the concept of legitimacy and applies the elements of the concept to concrete problems in university governance. Legitimacy is measured by the assessment of several elements of governance by constituents. It is a function of constituents' value systems, of the decision-making issue, and of the level at which decisions are made. The components of legitimacy are developed, and illustrative applications are provided. Through operational application of the idea of political legitimacy, it is contended that more realistic and workable solutions to governance can be approximated and that crisis oriented governance tactics can be reserved for situations which genuinely require them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1973).Governance of Higher Education: Six Priority Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1963).Modern Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. (1963). “Authority,”Political Studies. 11: 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunne, M. G. (1974). “Distribution of Authority and Patterns of Governance in a Sample of State and Community Colleges in Pennsylvania.” Unpublished Ed. D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Kelman, H. (1970). “A Social-Psychological Model of Political Legitimacy and its Relevance to Black and White Student Protest Movements,”Psychiatry. 33: 224–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B., Weathersby, G., and Patterson, Virginia W. (1970).The Outputs of Higher Education: Their Identification, Measurement and Evaluation. Boulder, Colorado: Western Inter-state Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, D. W. (1973).Variability in Faculty Perception of Legitimacy of Decision Making at Nine Pennsylvania Institutions. University Park, Pennsylvania: Center for the Study of Higher Education, The Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenning, O. T. (1974).The “Benefits Crisis” in Higher Education. Washington: American Association for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1969). “Social Conflict, Legitimacy and Democracy.” In: C. J. Larson and P. C. Wasburn (eds.)Power, Participation and Ideology: Readings in the Sociology of American Political Life. New York: David McKay. p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peabody, R. (1962). “Perceptions of Organizational Authority: A Comparative Analysis,”Administrative Science Quarterly. 6: 461–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Survey Subcommittee of Committee “T”. (1971).AAUP Bulletin. 57: 68–124.

  • Weber, M. (1961). “The Three Types of Legitimate Rule,” trans. H. Gerth. In: A. Etzioni (ed.).A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. pp. 7, 9, and 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Higher Education, University of Virginia, U.S.A.

    David W. Leslie (Assistant Professor of Education)

Authors
  1. David W. Leslie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leslie, D.W. Legitimizing university governance: Theory and practice. High Educ 4, 233–246 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569172

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01569172

Keywords

Search

Navigation