Skip to main content
Log in

Hypersensitivity to mutation and sister-chromatid-exchange induction in CHO cell mutants defective in incising DNA containing UV lesions

  • Published:
Somatic Cell Genetics

Abstract

Five UV-sensitive mutant strains of CHO cells representing different genetic complementation groups were analyzed for their ability to perform the incision step of nucleotide excision repair after UV exposure. The assay utilized inhibitors of DNA synthesis to accumulate the short-lived strand breaks resulting from repair incisions. After 6 J/m2, each of the mutants showed <10% of the incision rate of the parental AA8 cells. After 50 J/m2, the rate in AA8 was similar to that at 6 J/m2, but the rates in the mutants were significantly higher (∼20% of the rate of AA8). Thus by this incision assay the mutants were phenotypically indistinguishable. Each of the mutants were hypersensitive to mutation induction at both thehprt andaprt loci by a factor of 10, and in the one strain tested ouabain resistance was induced sevenfold more efficiently than in AA8 cells. Sister chromatid exchange was also induced with sevenfold increased efficiency in the two mutant strains examined. Thus, these CHO mutants resemble xeroderma pigmentosum cells in terms of their incision defects and their hypersensitivity to DNA damage by UV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. Hanawalt, P.C., Cooper, P.K., Ganesan, A.K., and Smith, C.A. (1979).Annu. Rev. Biochem. 48:783–836.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedberg, E.C., Ehmann, U.K., and Williams, J.J. (1979).Adv. Radiat. Biol. 8:85–174.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cleaver, J.E. (1978). InMetabolic Basis of Inherited Disease, 4th ed, (eds.) Stanbury, J.B., Wyngaarden, J.B., and Frederickson, D.S. (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 1072–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bootsma, D. (1978). InDNA Repair Mechanisms, (eds.) Hanawalt, P.C., Friedberg, E.C., and Fox, C.F. (Academic Press, New York), pp. 589–601.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andrews, A.D., Barrett, S.F., and Robbins, J.H. (1978).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75:1984–1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maher, V.M., Dorney, D.J., Mendrala, A.L., Konze-Thomas, B., and McCormick, J.J. (1979).Mutat. Res. 62:311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glover, T.W., Chang, C.-C., Trosko, J.E., and Li, S.S.L. (1979).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:3982–3986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kraemer, K.H., DeWeerd-Kastelein, E.A., Robbins, J.H., Keijzer, W., Barrett, S.F., Petinga, R.A., and Bootsma, D. (1975).Mutat. Res. 33:327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arase, S., Kozuka, T., Tanaka, K., Ikenaga, M., and Takebe, H. (1979).Mutat. Res. 59:143–146.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keijzer, W., Jaspers, N.G.J., Abrahams, P.J., Taylor, A.M.R., Arlett, C.F., Zelle, B., Takebe, H., Kinmont, P.D.S., and Bootsma, D. (1979).Mutat. Res. 62:183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, A.R., Kirk-Bell, S., Arlett, C.F., Patterson, M.C., Lohman, P.H.M., de Weerd-Kastelein, E.A., and Bootsma, D. (1975).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72:219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hayakawa, H., Ishizaki, K., Inoue, M., Yagi, T., Sekiguchi, M., and Takebe, H. (1981).Mutat. Res. 80:381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fornace, A.J., Kohn, K.W., and Kann, H.E., Jr. (1976).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73:39–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka, K., Hayakawa, H., Sekiguchi, M., and Okada, Y. (1977).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74:2958–2962.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, L.H., Rubin, J.S., Cleaver, J.E., Whitmore, G.F., and Brookman, K. (1980).Somat. Cell Genet. 6:391–405.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Busch, D.B., Cleaver, J.E., and Glaser, D.A. (1980).Somat. Cell Genet. 6:407–418.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, L.H., Busch, D.B., Brookman, K., Mooney, C.L., and Glaser, D.A. (1981).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78:3734–3737.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, R.D. and Burki, H.J. Mutat. Res. 95:505–514.

  19. Thompson, L.H., Brookman, K.W., and Mooney, C.L. (1980).Environ. Mutagen. 2:268 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson, L.H., Brookman, K.W., Carrano, A.V., and Dillehay, L.E. (1982).Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79:534–538.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brookman, K.W., Thompson, L.H., Salazar, E.P., Dillehay, L.E., and Mooney, C.L. (1981).Environ. Mutagen. 3:394 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, L.H., Fong, S., and Brookman, K. (1980).Mutat. Res. 74:21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kohn, K.W., Ewig, R.A.G., Erickson, L.C., and Zwelling, L.A. (1981). InDNA Repair, a Laboratory Manual of Research Procedures, (eds.) Friedberg, E.C., and Hanawalt, P.C. (Marcel Dekker, New York), pp. 379–401.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Collins, A.R.S., and Johnson, R.T. (1981). InDNA Repair, a Laboratory Manual of Research Procedures, (eds.) Friedberg, E.C., and Hanawalt, P.C. (Marcel Dekker, New York), pp. 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Carrano, A.V., Thompson, L.H., Stetka, D.G., Minkler, J.L., Mazrimas, J.A., and Fong, S. (1979).Mutat. Res. 63:175–188.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hiss, E.A., and Preston, R.J. (1977).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 478:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baker, R.M. (1979). InBanbury Report 2, Mammalian Cell Mutagenesis: The Maturation of Test Systems, (eds.) Hsie, A.W., O'Neill, J.P., and McElheny, V.K. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York), pp. 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Painter, R.B. (1980).Mutat. Res. 70:337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kato, H. (1974).Nature 249:552–553.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ishizaki, K., Nikaido, O., and Takebe, H. (1980).Photochem. Photobiol. 31:277–279.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Natarajan, A.T., van Zeeland, A.A., Verdegaal-Immerzeel, E.A.M., and Filon, A.R. (1980).Mutat. Res. 69:307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Collins, A.R.S., Downes, C.S., and Johnson, R.T. (1980).J. Cell. Physiol. 103:179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Myhr, B.C., Turnbull, D., and DiPaolo, J.A. (1979).Mutat. Res. 62:341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  34. DeWeerd-Kastelein, E.A., Keijzer, W., Rainaldi, G., and Bootsma, D. (1977).Mutat. Res. 45:253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cheng, W.-S., Tarone, R.W., Andrews, A.D., Whang-Peng, J.S., and Robbins, J.H. (1978).Cancer Res. 38:1601–1609.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cleaver, J.E. (1977).J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2:1387–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cleaver, J.E. (1981).Exp. Cell Res. 136:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thompson, L.H. (1982). InInduced Mutagenesis: Molecular Mechanisms and Their Implications for Environmental Protection, (eds.) Lawrence, C.W., Prakash, L., and Sherman, F. (Plenum Press, New York, in press).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Meyn, R.E., Jenkins, S.F., and Thompson, L.H. (1982)Cancer Res. 42:3106–3110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, L.H., Brookman, K.W., Dillehay, L.E. et al. Hypersensitivity to mutation and sister-chromatid-exchange induction in CHO cell mutants defective in incising DNA containing UV lesions. Somat Cell Mol Genet 8, 759–773 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543017

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01543017

Keywords

Navigation