Skip to main content
Log in

Mutagenicity in haploid yeast meiosis resulting from repair of DSBs by the sister chromatid

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Current Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mutations in diploid budding yeast occur in meiosis at higher frequencies than in cells grown vegetatively. Such meiotic mutations are thought to result from the repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in meiosis, during the process of recombination. Here, we report studies of mutagenicity in haploid strains that may undergo meiosis due to the expression of both mating-type alleles, MATa and MATα. We measure the rate of mutagenicity in the reporter gene CAN1, and find it to be fivefold higher than in mitotic cells, as determined by fluctuation analysis. This enhanced meiotic mutagenicity is shown to depend on the presence of SPO11, the gene responsible for meiotic DSBs. Mutations in haploid meiosis must result from repair of the DSBs through interaction with the sister chromatid, rather than with non-sister chromatids as in diploids. Thus, mutations in diploid meiosis that are not ostensibly associated with recombination events can be explained by sister-chromatid repair. The spectrum of meiotic mutations revealed by Sanger sequencing is similar in haploid and in diploid meiosis. Compared to mitotic mutations in CAN1, long Indels are more frequent among meiotic mutations. Both, meiotic and mitotic mutations are more common at G/C sites than at A/T, in spite of an opposite bias in the target reporter gene. We conclude that sister-chromatid repair of DSBs is a major source of mutagenicity in meiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All reagents are available upon request.

References

  • Alani E, Cao L, Kleckner N (1987) A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics 116:541–545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arbel A, Zenvirth D, Simchen G (1999) Sister chromatid-based repair is mediated by RAD54, not by DMC1 or TID1. EMBO J 18:2648–2658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arbel-Eden A, Simchen G (2019) Elevated mutagenicity in meiosis and its mechanism. BioEssays 41:272–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergerat A, De Massy B, Baudat F et al (1997) An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386:414–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Massy B, Baudat F, Nicolas A (1994) Initiation of recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid meiosis. Acad Sci USA 91:11929–11933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dov A (2015) The contribution of trans-lesion DNA polymerases Rev1, Rev3, Rad30 to the meiotic mutagenesis of budding yeast. MSc Dissertation, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem (Accession No. H/JSL/002000812). In Hebrew

  • Goldfarb T, Lichten M (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol 8(10):e1000520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag-Liautard C, Dorris M, Maside X et al (2007) Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445:82–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hugerat Y, Simchen G (1993) Mixed segregation and recombination of chromosomes and YACs during single-division meiosis in spo13 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135:297–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kassir Y, Simchen G (1991) Monitoring meiosis and sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzym 194:94–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kassir Y, Granot D, Simchen G (1988) IME1, a positive regulator gene of meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 52:853–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katis VL, Matos J, Mori S et al (2004) Spo13 facilitates monopolin recruitment to kinetochores and regulates maintenance of centromeric cohesion during yeast meiosis. Curr Biol 14:2183–2196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney S (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 52:1–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney S, Neale MJ (2006) Initiation of meiotic recombination by formation of DNA double-strand breaks: mechanism and regulation. Biochem Soc Trans 34:523–525

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney S, Giroux CN, Kleckner N (1997) Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr GW, Sarkar S, Arumugam P (2012) How to halve ploidy: lessons from budding yeast meiosis. Cell Mol Life Sci 69:3037–3051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klapholz S, Esposito RE (1980) Isolation of SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 from a natural variant of yeast that undergoes a single meiotic division. Genetics 96:567–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lang GI, Murray AW (2008) Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178:67–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee BH, Amon A, Prinz S (2002) Spo13 regulates cohesin cleavage. Genes Dev 16:1672–1681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loidl J, Nairz K (1997) Karyotype variability in yeast caused by nonallelic recombination in haploid meiosis. Genetics 146:70–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luria SE, Delbrück M (1943) Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics 28:491–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magni GE (1963) The origin of spontaneous mutations during meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 50:975–980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magni GE (1964) Origin and nature of spontaneous mutations in meiotic organisms. J Cell Physiol 64:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Magni GE, Von Borstel RC (1962) Different rates of spontaneous mutation during mitosis and meiosis in yeast. Genetics 47:1097–1108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mansour O, Morciano L, Zion K et al (2020) Timing of appearance of new mutations during yeast meiosis and their association with recombination. Curr Genet 66:577–592

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ness RW, Morgan AD, Colegrave N et al (2012) Estimate of the spontaneous mutation rate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics 192:1447–1454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz S, Amon A, Klein F (1997) Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146:781–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rattray A, Santoyo G, Shafer B et al (2015) Elevated mutation rate during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 11:e100491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosche WA, Foster PL (2000) Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations. Methods 20:4–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rose M, Winston F, Hieter P (1990) Methods in yeast genetics - a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharon G, Simchen G (1990) Mixed segregation of chromosomes during single-division meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 125:475–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW (2002) Spo13 protects meiotic cohesin at centromeres in meiosis I. Genes Dev 16:1659–1671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simchen G, Hugerat Y (1993) What determines whether chromosomes segregate reductionally or equationally in meiosis? BioEssays 15:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff JE, Klapholz S, Esposito RE (1982) Meiosis in haploid yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:2986–2990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan WL, Gocke E, Manney TR (1979) The CAN1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: fine-structure analysis and forward mutation rates. Genetics 91:35–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humphryes N, Hochwagen A (2014) A non-sister act: recombination template choice during meiosis. Exp Cell Res 329:53–60

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our colleague Dr. Tanvi Suhane for her useful comments on the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by funds provided by the Israel Science Foundation (Grants No. 501/16 and 397/20), the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (Grant No. 2009299) and by Hadassah Academic College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GS, AAE. Performed the experiments: OM, LM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DZ, LM. Wrote the paper: GS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giora Simchen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or competing interests regarding this work.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael Polymenis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 3291 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simchen, G., Mansour, O., Morciano, L. et al. Mutagenicity in haploid yeast meiosis resulting from repair of DSBs by the sister chromatid. Curr Genet 67, 799–806 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01189-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01189-w

Keywords

Navigation