Skip to main content
Log in

How farmers research and learn: The case of arable farmers of East Anglia, UK.

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study of arable agriculture in East Anglia, UK, draws on the experiences of farmer participatory research and the use of indigenous knowledge in agricultural development in less developed countries. Farmers were found to be continually doing research, although agricultural science has tended to play it down. Farmers' research was found to be closely linked to the specific locality and the strategies, aspirations, and experiences of farmers. The diversity of agriculture within East Anglia makes local research necessary and the idea of blueprints for agricultural production untenable. The process of generating information can come from learning while working, which may appear to be experiential rather than experimental. Other ideas are generated by observing chance occurrences and some farmers were found to be doing more structured experiments similar to agricultural science. Criticisms of farmers' own research are reviewed. However, this paper proposes that such research should not be compared to scientific method, since agricultural science has the primary objective of generating information while farmers' research is embedded in the local context and is part of the farming practice. It is therefore necessary to have complementary roles for farmers' own research and formal research rather than an attempt to combine or translate indigenous knowledge and farmers' experimentation in agricultural science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, M. D. (1992). “Reasons for New Interest in On-Farm Research,”Biological Agriculture and Horticulture, Vol. 8.

  • BASF (1994). “Appropriate fungicide dose rates for cereals,”The Agronomist, The BASF magazine for the progressive farmer, No 2.

  • Bawden, R. J. (1991). “Systems thinking and practice in agriculture,”Journal of Dairy science 74 (7).

  • Becket, J. V. (1990).The Agricultural Revolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. W. (1992). “Promoting farmers experiments in non-chemical pest control.” Paper prepared for IIED/IDS Beyond Farmer First: Rural Peoples' Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice Workshop, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 27–29 October 1992 (Shortened version in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (1994)).

  • van der Bleik, J. and L. van Veldhuison, (1993). “Developing tools together: Report of a study on the role of participation in the development of tools, equipment and techniques in appropriate technology programmes.” Eschborn/Leusden: GATE/ETC.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Boef, W, K. Amanor, and K. Wellard, with A. Bebbington, (1993).Cultivating Knowledge; Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D, D. M. Warren, and O. Werner (eds.) (1980).Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. New York: University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, R. (1990). “The meaning and benefit of partnership in agricultural research; past successes—future potentials,”American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5 (4).

  • Chambers, R. (1983).Rural Development; Putting the Last First Harlow, UK: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp (1989).Farmer First: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. (1990). “Farmers experiment with a new crop,”ILEIA Newsletter 6 (1).

  • Danbom, D. B. (1986). “The agricultural experimentation station and professionalization; scientists' goals for agriculture,”Agricultural History, 60 (2).

  • van Dusseldorp, D and L. Box (1993). “Local and scientific knowledge; developing a dialogue.” In W., de Boef, K. Amanor, and K. Wellard, with A. Bebbington,Cultivating Knowledge; Genetic Diversity, Farmer Experimentation and Crop Research. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyke, G. V. (1974).Comparative Experiments with Field Crops. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernle, Lord (1912).English Farming Past and Present (Reprinted 1961). London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (1994).Innovation, Information and Agricultural Research in East Anglia. Sustainable Agricultural Research Centre, School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia.

  • Farrington, J. and A. Martin (1988). “Farmer participatory research; a review of concepts and practices.”Agricultural Research and Extension Network Discussion Paper 19 London: ODI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, C, J. King, J. De With, J. Bushnell, and L. Lucas (1990). “Participatory strategies for information exchange,”American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5 (4).

  • Haverkort, B. (1991). “Farmers' Experiments and Participatory Technology Development.” In B. Haverkort, J. Van der Kamp, and A. Waters-Bayer (eds,),Joining farmers Experiments: Experiences in Participatory Technology Development. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS (1979). “Rural Development; whose knowledge counts?”IDS Bulletin Special Number 10 (2).

  • Johnson, A. W. (1972). “Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture,”Human Ecology Vol. 1 (2).

  • Kloppenberg, J. (1991). “Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: local knowledge for an alternative agriculture,”Rural Sociology 56 (4).

  • Knight, M. (1995).Farmer Participation in Agricultural Research: Machinery Innovations in Norfolk Agriculture. BSc Thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1981).The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the constructivist and contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. (1992). “An actor oriented paradigm.” In N. Long and A. Long,Battlefields of Knowledge: the interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. and J. D. van der Ploeg (1994). “Heterogeneity, actor and structure: towards a reconstitution of the concept of structure.” In D. Booth (ed.),Rethinking social development: theory, research and practice. Harlow, UK: Longman Scientific and Technical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendras, J. (1970).The vanishing peasant: innovation and change in French agriculture. Cambridge.

  • Molnar, J. J., P. A. Duffy, K. A. Cummins, and E. Van Santen (1992). “Agricultural science and agricultural counterculture: paradigms in search of a future,”Rural Sociology 57 (1).

  • Odum, E. P. (1989). “Input management of production systems.”Science 243 (13 January): 177–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okali, C., J. Sumberg, and J. Farrington (1994).Farmer Participatory Research: Rhetoric and Reality. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Ploeg, J. D. (1990).Labor, markets and agricultural production. Boulder: CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J. D. and A. Long (1994).Born from within: practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development. Assen/Maastrict, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. (1991). “Farmers' Extension Practice and Technology Adaptation: Agricultural Revolution in 17th–19th Century Britain,”Agriculture and Human Values 8 (1–2).

  • Pretty, J. (1995). “Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture,”World Development 23 (8).

  • Reijntjes, C, B. Haverkort, and A. Waters-Bayer (1992).Farming for the future: An introduction to Low-External Input Sustainable Agriculture. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1985).Indigenous Agricultural Revolution; ecology and food production in West Africa. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1986).Coping with Hunger; hazard and experiment in an African Rice farming system. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1989). “Agriculture as performance.” In R. Chambers, A. Pacey, and L. A. Thrupp (eds.),Farmer First: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1992). “Rural development and local knowledge; the case of rice in Sierra Leone.” Paper prepared for IIED/IDS Beyond Farmer First: Rural Peoples' Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice Workshop, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 27–29 October, 1992 (Shortened version in I. Scoones and J. Thompson (1994).Beyond Farmer First: rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London: IT Publications)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roep, D. and R. de Bruin (1994). “Regional marginalisation, styles of farming and technology development.” In J. D. van der Ploeg and A. Long, ABorn from within: practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development. Assen/Masstrict, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983).The Reflexive Practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I and J. Thompson (1992). “Beyond farmer First: rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice; towards a theoretical framework.” Overview paper prepared for IIED/IDS Beyond Farmer First: Rural Peoples' Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice Workshop, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 27–29 October, 1992.

  • Scoones, I. and J. Thompson (eds.) (1994).Beyond farmer First: rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London: IT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenbach, A. (1992) “Learning by improvisation: the logic of farmers experimentation in Mali.” Paper prepared or IIED/IDS Beyond Farmer First: Rural Peoples' Knowledge, Agricultural Research and Extension Practice Workshop, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, 27–29 October, 1992.

  • Sumberg, J. and C. Okali, (in press).Farmers' Experiments: Characteristics and Implications.

  • Thirsk, J. (1987).England's Agricultural Regions and Agrarian History, 1500–1700. Studies in Economic and Social History. Basingstoke: Macmillan Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1804).A General View of the County of Norfolk. London: Board of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

With a background in human geography, Fergus Lyon has done research on farming systems and social forestry in Nigeria, India, and Nepal. At present he is working on an agricultural research project in the Brong Ahafo Region of Ghana developing farmer participation in the research and studying the marketing systems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyon, F. How farmers research and learn: The case of arable farmers of East Anglia, UK.. Agric Hum Values 13, 39–47 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530522

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530522

Keywords

Navigation