Skip to main content
Log in

Rationality, habitus, and agricultural landscapes: Ethnographic case studies in landscape sociology

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To explain how agricultural landscapes become social constructions of the natural environment, this essay utilizes Jurgen Habermas's concept of rationality and Pierre Bourdieu's constructs of field and habitus to examine how social relationships shape the way three farmers perceive, alter, and evaluate their land. Intensive interviewing and aerial photographs are used to document the processes through which farmers internalize the primary rationalities of social relationships as a foundation of decision-making regarding water impoundments on their land. One farmer internalizes an instrumental rationality while interacting within relationships with the economic and political system; his landscape changes are meant to improve his ability to extract profit from the land. A second case focuses on a farmer who draws upon familial relationships to provide a substantive counter to the instrumental rationalities of economic relationships; he built a pond to conserve soil. The final case is of a farmer who resists social relationships governed by an instrumental rationality; he built a pond to improve and preserve the beauty of his farm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bourdieu, Pierre and Loic J. D. Wacquant. 1992.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984.Homo Academicus. Trans. by Peter Collier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1977.Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, John E., Barbara Schnable, Curtis E. Beus, and Don A. Dillman. “Changes in the soil conservation attitudes and behaviors of farmers in the Palouse and Camas prairies: 1976 1990.”Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49 (Sept.–Oct., 1994): 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, Denis. 1984.Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ervin, C. A. and D. Ervin. “Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy Implications.”Land Economics 58 (Aug., 1982): 278–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, Richard T. T. and Michel Godron. 1986.Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1973.The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984.The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Jess and Thomas M. Beckley. “Ownership and Control of Farmland: Landlord-Tenant Relations in Wisconsin.”Rural Sociology 58 (Winter, 1993): 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, B. W., W. Saupe, and R. Klemme. “Conservation Tillage: The Role of Farm and Operator Characteristics and the Perception of Soil Erosion.”Land Economics 65 (May, 1989): 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, Thomas and Lorraine Garkovich. “Landscape: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment.”Rural Sociology 59 (Spring, 1994): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1987.The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Vol. II. Trans. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1984.The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Vol. I. Trans. by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Frederick E. 1992.Soil Survey of Callaway County, Missouri. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsching, P. F., C. Stofferahn, P. Nowack, and D. Wagner. “Adopter Characteristics and Adoption Patters of Minimum Tillage: Implications for Soil Conservation Programs.”Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 38 (Sept.–Oct., 1983): 428–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, A. V. 1991.The Corporate Reapers: The Book of Agribusiness. Washington, DC: Essential Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Patrick H. 1988.My Own Boss? Class, Rationality, and the Family Farm. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munch, Richard. 1994.Social Theory. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning-Rowsell, Edmund C. and David Lowenthal, Editors. 1986.Landscape Meanings and Values. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikoon, J. Sanford. 1995. “Towards a Performance-Based Study of Conservation.” Unpublished. Columbia: University of Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, Sonya. “Culture and Agricultural Land Tenure.”Rural Sociology 58 (Winter, 1993): 580–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan. 1980.The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William H., Jr. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.”American Journal of Sociology 98 (July, 1992): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, Frederick R. 1990.Soil Conservation in the United States: Policy and Planning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, John. 1990.The Tourist Gaze. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Neil and Richard Munton. 1992. “Conceptualizing Agriculture-Environment Relations.”Sociologia Ruralis 22(1): 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1947.The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Trans. and ed. by Talcot Parsons and A. M. Henderson. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Leland L. Glenna is a graduate student in the department of rural sociology at the University of Missouri-Columbia. His research interests include ethics, the sociology of agriculture, and environmental sociology. He is currently working on his dissertation in which he is using discourse ethics to critique the environmental and social consequences of the way standards for small grain commodity production are introduced to farmers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glenna, L.L. Rationality, habitus, and agricultural landscapes: Ethnographic case studies in landscape sociology. Agric Hum Values 13, 21–38 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530521

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530521

Keywords

Navigation