Skip to main content
Log in

Computation of efficient solutions of discretely distributed stochastic optimization problems

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Operations-Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In engineering and economics often a certain vectorx of inputs or decisions must be chosen, subject to some constraints, such that the expected costs (or loss) arising from the deviation between the outputA(ω) x of a stochastic linear systemx→A(ω)x and a desired stochastic target vectorb(ω) are minimal. Hence, one has the following stochastic linear optimization problem minimizeF(x)=Eu(A(ω)x b(ω)) s.t.xεD, (1) whereu is a convex loss function on ℝm, (A(ω), b(ω)) is a random (m,n + 1)-matrix, “E” denotes the expectation operator andD is a convex subset of ℝn. Concrete problems of this type are e.g. stochastic linear programs with recourse, error minimization and optimal design problems, acid rain abatement methods, problems in scenario analysis and non-least square regression analysis.

Solving (1), the loss functionu should be exactly known. However, in practice mostly there is some uncertainty in assigning appropriate penalty costs to the deviation between the outputA (ω)x and the targetb(ω). For finding in this situation solutions “hedging against uncertainty” a set of so-called efficient points of (1) is defined and a numerical procedure for determining these compromise solutions is derived. Several applications are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appa G, Smith C (1973) OnL 1- and L-Estimation. Math Programming 5:73–87

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloomfield P, Steiger WL (1983) Least Absolute Deviations. Birkhäuser, Boston-Basel-Stuttgart

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies M (1967) Linear Approximation using the Criterion of least total Deviation. J Roy Statist Soc Ser B 29:101–109

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dielman T, Pfaffenberger R (1982) LAV Estimation in Linear Regression: A Review. In [28], pp 31–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dodge Y (Ed) (1987) Statistical Data Analysis Based on theL 1-Norm and Related Methods. North Holland, Amsterdam-New York-Oxford-Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis JH, McBean EA, Farquhar GJ (1985) Chance-Constrained/Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Acid Rain Abatement I. Complete Colinearity and Noncolinearity. Atmospheric Environment 19:925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis JH, McBean EA, Farquhar GJ (1986) Chance-Constrained/Stochastic Linear Programming Model for Acid Rain Abatement II. Limited Colinearity. Atmospheric Environment 20:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ermoliev Yu, Wets RJ-B (Eds) (1988) Numerical Techniques for Stochastic Optimization. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol 10. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Everitt BS (1987) Introduction to Optimization Methods and their Application in Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London-New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Fortin M, McBean EA (1983) A Management Model for Acid Rain Abatement. Atmospheric Environment 17(11):2331–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fronza G, Melli P (1984) Assignment of Emission Abatement Levels by Stochastic Programming. Atmospheric Environment 18:531–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuessle RW, Brill ED, Liebman JC (1987) Air Quality Planning: A General Chance-Constrained Model. J Envir Engrg, ASCE 113(1):106–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gentl JE, Kennedy WJ, Sposito VA (1977) On least absolute value estimation. Communications in Statistics, Vol 6

  14. Guldman J-M (1986) Interactions between Weather Stochasticity and the Locations of Pollution Sources and Receptors in Air Quality Planning: A Chance-Constrained Approach. Geographical Analysis 18:198–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marti K (1988) Descent Directions and Efficient Solutions in Discretely Distributed Stochastic Programms. LN in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol 299. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Narula SC (1982) Optimization Techniques in Linear Regression. In [28], pp 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reibnitz U von (1988) Scenario Techniques. McGraw-Hill Company, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rockafellar RT, Wets RJ-B (1987) Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization under Uncertainty. IIASA Working Paper WP-87-119. IIASA Laxenburg, Austria, December 1987

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rotach M et al. (1982) Szenarien künftiger Entwicklungen. Institut für Verkehrsplanung und Transporttechnik der ETH Zürich, November 1982

  20. Sawaragi Y et al. (1985) Theory of Multiobjective Optimization. Academic Press, Orlando-New York-Toronto-Sydney-Tokyo

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherman S (1951) On a Theorem of Hardy, Littlwood, Polya and Blackwell. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 37:826–831

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Sinitsyn IN (1974) Statistical Linearization. Automation and Remote Control 35:765–776

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinsiek E, Knauer P (1981) Szenarien als Instrument der Umweltplanung. Angewandte Systemanalyse 2:10–19

    Google Scholar 

  24. Turner DB (1979) Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling: A Critical Review. J Air Pollution Control Assoc 29:502–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Watson GA (1980) Approximation Theory and Numerical Methods. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Wets R (1988) The Aggregation Principle in Scenario Analysis and Stochastic Optimization. Research supported in Part by Grants from the National Science Foundation and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research

  27. Wets R (1988) Stochastic Programming. To appear in Handbook on Operations Research

  28. Zanakis SH, Rustagi JS (Eds) (1982) Optimization in Statistics. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, Vol 19. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zanakis SH, Rustagi JS (1982) Introduction to contributions in Regression and Correlation. In [28], pp 7–9

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zentner RD (1975) Scenarios: A New Tool for Corporate Planners. Chemical and Engineering News, Int Edition, Vol 53, Oct 1975, pp 22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marti, K. Computation of efficient solutions of discretely distributed stochastic optimization problems. ZOR - Methods and Models of Operations Research 36, 259–294 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415892

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415892

Key words

Navigation