Skip to main content
Log in

A framework for interactive multiple criteria group decision support

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interactive framework is developed for multiple criteria group decision support. Decision makers are asked to specify aspiration and reservation levels to establish a preferred range for the value of each objective for each decision maker. Group and individual solutions are generated as a function of these levels. Decision makers are asked to react to current solutions by revising their aspiration and reservation levels and additional solutions are generated. The framework is both simpler and more flexible than previous approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Franz, L.S., G.R. Reeves and J.J. Gonzalez. (1992). “Group Decision Processes: MOLP Procedures Facilitating Group and Individual Decision Orientations,”Computers & Operations Research 19(7), 695–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. (1986). “Group Decision Support Systems.” In E. McLean and H. Sol (eds.),Decision Support Systems: A Decade in Perspective, New York: Elsevier, pp. 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, P.G.W. (1987). “Decision Support Systems: The Next Decades,”Decision Support Systems 3(3), 253–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. (1988). “A Procedure for Negotiating Efficient and Non-Efficient Compromises,”Decision Support Systems 4(2), 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E., W. Michalowski, D. Cray, and I. Lee. (1991). “An Analytic Basis for Decision Support in Negotiations,”Naval Research Logistics 38, 743–761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P., H. Moskowitz, J. Wallenius, and S. Zionts. (1986). “An Interactive Approach to Optimization with Multiple Decision Makers,”Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 33, 589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kottemann, J.E., and F.D. Davis. (1991). “Decisional Conflict, and User Acceptance of Multicriteria Decision-Making Aids,”Decision Sciences 22(4), 918–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T.K. (1992). “Aspiration Level Adaptation: An Empirical Exploration,”Management Science, 38, 623–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowski, A., and A.P. Wierzbicki. (1989). “Decision Support Systems Using Reference Point Optimization.” In A. Lewandowski and A.P. Wierzbicki (eds.),Aspiration Based Decision Support Systems Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R.E. (1986).Multiple Criteria Optimization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera, R. (1990). “Group Decision and Negotiation Support—A Methodological Survey,”OR Spektrum 12(1), 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., and T. Shen. (1989). “Group Decision Making with MOLP Applications,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19(1), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weistroffer, H.R. (1984). “A Combined Over-and Under-Achievement Programming Approach to Multiple Objectives Decision-Making,”Large Scale Systems 7(1), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeves, G.R., Bordetski, A. A framework for interactive multiple criteria group decision support. Group Decis Negot 4, 107–115 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01410097

Key Words

Navigation