Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Group Decision Support Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation

Abstract

We provide a description of three significant and original contributions made by the Zaragoza Multicriteria Decision Making Group to the field of group decision and negotiation using the analytic hierarchy process. After beginning with a short overview of the AHP and its role in group decision support, we go on to include (i) a review of the importance of consistency in group decision-making and a profile of the proposal denominated as consistency consensus matrices; this is followed by (ii) an outline of the procedure that provides collective valuations of the alternatives in a group decision problem, known as the aggregation of individual preference structures,; and, finally, there is (iii) a brief examination of the Bayesian approach to group decision-making with the analytic hierarchy process and its relationship with prioritization, consistency, and compatibility. We conclude with an explanation and discussion of the cognitive orientation and its implementation in group decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2003) The geometric consistency index. Approximated thresholds. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2003) Consistency stability intervals for a judgement in AHP-decision support systems. Eur J Oper Res 145(2):382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2016) Precise consistency consensus matrix in an AHP-group decision making local context. Ann Oper Res 245(1):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Turón A (2019) AHP-group decision making based on consistency. Mathematics 7(3):242; https://doi.org/10.3390/math7030242, Open Access

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jimenez JM, Salvador M (2007) A Bayesian prioritization procedure for AHP-group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 182:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Moreno-Jimenez JM, Salvador M (2010) Consensus building in AHP-group decision making: a Bayesian approach. Oper Res 58(6):1755–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2013) Influence, relevance and discordance of criteria in AHP-global Bayesian prioritization. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 12(4):837–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altuzarra A, Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2019) Homogeneous groups of actors in an AHP-local decision making context: a Bayesian approach. Mathematics 7:294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbel A, Vargas LG (1993) Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation. Eur J Oper Res 69:300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basak I (1998) Probabilistic judgements specified partially in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo JM, Smith AFM (1994) Bayesian theory. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bozóki S, Fülöp J, Rónyai L (2010) On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Math Comput Model 52(1–2):318–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson N, Joseph A (1999) Generating consensus priority point vectors: algorithmic goal programming approach. Comput Oper Res 26(6):637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (1996) The web of life. Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Fan ZP, Ma J, Zeng S (2011) A hybrid grouping genetic algorithm for reviewer group construction problem. Expert Syst Appl 38(3):2401–2411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford G, Williams CA (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices. J Math Psychol 29(4):387–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono E (1970) Lateral thinking. Penguin Books, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong Y, Zhang G, Hong WH, Xu Y (2010) Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decis Support Syst 49:281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2000) Reciprocal distributions in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 123(1):154–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2007) Aggregation of individual preference structures. Group Decis Negot 16(4):287–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2004) A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):318–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar MT, Aguarón J, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2015) Some extensions of the precise consistency consensus matrix. Decis Support Syst 74:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman E, Peniwati K (1998) Aggregating individual judgements and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 108:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM, Salvador M (2007) AHP-group decision making: a Bayesian approach based on mixtures. Group Decis Negot 16(6):485–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groselj P, Stirn LZ (2012) Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 223(2):417–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn ED (2003) Decision making with uncertain judgements: a stochastic formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. Decis Sci 34(3):443–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen RP (2003) Decisionarium-aiding decisions, negotiating and collecting opinions on the web. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12(2–3):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iz PH, Gardiner LR (1993) Analysis of multiple criteria decision support systems for cooperative groups. Group Decis Negot 2:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Straus and Giroux Farrar, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2):263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C (2007) A revised framework for deriving preferences values from pairwise comparison matrices. Eur J Oper Res 176(2):1145–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migers J (2003) A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. J Oper Res Soc 54(6):559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhailov L (2004) Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method. Comput Oper Res 31(2):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Vargas LG (1993) A probabilistic study of preference structures in the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments. Math Comput Model 17(4–5):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Vargas LG (2018) Cognitive multicriteria decision making and the legacy of the analytic hierarchy process. Estudios de Economía Aplicada 36(1):67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Turón A (1999) The multicriteria procedural rationality on SISDEMA. Eur J Oper Res 119(2):388–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Raluy A, Turón A (2005) A spreadsheet module for consistent AHP-consensus building. Group Decis Negot 14(2):89–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Aguarón J, Escobar MT (2008) The core of consistency in AHP-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 17:249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Cardeñosa J, Gallardo C, de la Villa-Moreno MA (2014) A new e-learning tool for cognitive democracies in the Knowledge Society. Comput Hum Behav 30:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Jiménez JM, Gargallo P, Salvador M, Altuzarra A (2016) Systemic decision making: a Bayesian approach in AHP. Ann Oper Res 245(1):261–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan R (1997) Stochastic decision making using multiplicative AHP. Eur J Oper Res 97:543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP, Casella G (2004) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1996) Decision making with dependence and feedback: the analytic network process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Forman EH (1993) The Hierarchon: a dictionary of hierarchies. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Peniwati K (2008) Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvador M, Altuzarra A, Gargallo P, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2015) A Bayesian approach for maximising inner compatibility in AHP-systemic decision making. Group Decis Negot 24(4):655–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler RH (2017) Misbehaving: the making of behavioral economics. W.W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Turón A, Aguarón J, Escobar MT, Moreno-Jiménez JM (2019) A decision support system and some visualisation tools for AHP-GDM. Int J Decis Support Syst Technol 11(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Thaler RH (1990) Anomalies: preference reversals. J Econ Perspect 4(2):201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Honert RC (1998) Stochastic group preference modelling in the multiplicative AHP: a model of group consensus. Eur J Oper Res 110(1):99–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Honert RC, Lootsma FA (2000) Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system. Eur J Oper Res 120(1):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:199–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu ZB, Xu JP (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52:757–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2000) On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP. Eur J Oper Res 126:683–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Lai KK (2011) A distance-based group decision-making methodology for multiperson multi-criteria emergency decision support. Decis Support Syst 51:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang GQ, Dong YC, Xu YF (2014) Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf Fusion 17:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Grupo Decisión Multicriterio Zaragoza, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    José María Moreno-Jiménez, Juan Aguarón, María Teresa Escobar & Manuel Salvador

Authors
  1. José María Moreno-Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Aguarón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Teresa Escobar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Manuel Salvador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José María Moreno-Jiménez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    D. Marc Kilgour

  2. Strathclyde Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

    Colin Eden

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Moreno-Jiménez, J.M., Aguarón, J., Escobar, M.T., Salvador, M. (2021). Group Decision Support Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Kilgour, D.M., Eden, C. (eds) Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49629-6_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation