Skip to main content
Log in

A “model” proposal for reform in teacher training

  • Comment
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper uses as a point of departure two of Benton and Hoyt's (1990) survey items concerning undergraduate teaching and their finding that Holmes Group and Division 15 members favored more “sweeping changes” in teacher education whereas TESCSU members favored more “incremental changes.” It: (a) suggests that reform is unlikely to succeed without change in the behavior of those who teach prospective teachers; (b) suggests ways in which educational psychologists can improve the effectiveness of teachers and teacher training; and (c) questions whether moving teacher training to the graduate level will in fact improve such education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1983).The Architecture of Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977).Social Learning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., and Ross, S. A. (1963). A comparative test of the status envy, social power, and secondary reinforcement theories of identificatory learning.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67: 527–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., and Walters, R. H. (1963).Social Learning and Personality Development, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, S. L., and Hoyt, K. B. (1990). Educational reform: Implications for educational psychologistsEducat.Psychol. Rev. 2: 203–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1966).Toward a Theory of Instruction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evertson, C. M., and Smylie, M. A. (1987). Research on teaching and classroom processes: Views from two perspectives. In Glover, J. A., and Ronning, R. R. (eds.)Historical Foundations of Educational Psychology, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. T., and Chandler, L. A. (1988).Educational Psychology: Mastering Principles and Applications, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gideonse, H. D. (1986). The reduction in teacher-preparation institutions: Rationale and routes. In Galambos, E. C. (ed.),Improving Teacher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., and Bruning, R. H. (1987).Educational Psychology: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed., Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., and Frankie, G. (1967). Effects of parental dominance, warmth, and conflict on imitation in children.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 6: 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issler, K. (1983). A conception of excellence in teaching.Education 103: 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949).The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire, L. S. (1986). Mechanisms of memory.Science 232: 1612–1619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985a). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist 40: 385–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985b). Memory and consciousness.Canad. Psychol. 26: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, R.T. A “model” proposal for reform in teacher training. Educ Psychol Rev 2, 263–270 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323282

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323282

Key words

Navigation