Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of cyclosporine on liver regeneration after orthotopic reduced-size hepatic transplantation in the rat

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

These experiments were undertaken to study the effects of cyclosporine A (CsA) on liver regeneration after an isogeneic orthotopic reduced-size hepatic transplantation (RSHT) in rats. Male Wistar rats were treated with or without a daily injection of CsA beginning 24 hr before surgery and were subjected to a 68% partial hepatectomy. A isogeneic orthotopic reduced-size hepatic transplantation was performed in recipient rats pretreated with or without CsA. A daily injection of CsA was continued until the recipient rats were sacrificed. Animals were sacrificed at various time points (12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hr) postoperatively. The incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) into the DNA of the remnant hepatocytes was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody against BrdU. CsA (10 mg/kg/day) significantly augmented BrdU incorporation into hepatocytes after hepatectomy. The maximum labeling index (LI) was observed at 24 hr after hepatectomy. In contrast, the maximum LI in the recipient rats not receiving CsA was seen at 36 hr after RSHT, and 10 mg/kg/day of CsA decreased the LI at 36 hr after RSHT. A lower dose of CsA (3 mg/kg/day), however, significantly increased the LI in the recipient rats (P<0.01), and it reached a peak at 24 hr after RSHT when compared to the transplant recipients not receiving CsA. The time course of the increase in the LI in the transplant recipient rats receiving 3 mg/kg/day of CsA was similar to that observed in the rats after hepatectomy. This dosage improved the delay in the reduced-size hepatic transplant LI reaching its peak. These findings suggest that after RSHT the liver graft is more sensitive to both hepatotrophic and hepatotoxic effects of CsA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borel JF, Feurer C, Gubler HU, Stahelin H: Biological effects of cyclosporine A: A new antilymphocytic agent. Agents Actions 6:468–475, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coughlin JP, Austen WG, Donahoe PK, Russell WE: Liver regeneration during immunosuppression. J Pediatr Surg 22:566–570, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kahn D, Makowka L, Lai H, Eagon PK, Dindzans V, Starzl TE, Van Thiel DH: Cyclosporine augments hepatic regenerative response in rats. Dig Dis Sci 35:392–398, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Thistlethwaite JR, Rouch DA, Whitington PF, Lichtor JL: Liver transplantation with reduced-size donor organs. Transplantation 45:519–524, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Higgins GM, Anderson RM: Experimental pathology of the liver. I. Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol 12:186–188, 1931

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kamada N, Calne RY: Orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat: technique using cuff for portal vein anastomosis and biliary drainage. Transplantation 28:47–50, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Institutes of Health: Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Public Health Service, NIH Publication No. 86-23, Bethesda, Maryland, 1985

  8. Szybalski W: Research in radiotherapy: Approaches to chemical sensitization.In Nuclear Science Service Report No. 35, Publication No. 888.In RF Kallman (ed). National Academy of Science National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1961, p 162

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cawood AH, Savage JR: A comparison of the use of bromodeoxyuridine and [3H]thymidine in studies of the cell cycle. Cell Tissue Kinet 16:51–57, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harkness RD: The spatial distribution of dividing cells of the rat after partial hepatectomy. J Physiol 116:373–379, 1952

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rabes HM, Wirsching R, Tuczek HV, Iseler G: Analysis of cell cycle compartments of hepatocytes after partial hepatectomy. Cell Tissue Kinet 9:517–532, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kilts CD, Gooch MD, Knopes KD: Quantitation of plasma catecholamines by on-line trace enrichment high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. J Neurosci Methods 11:257–273, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rossi G, de Carlis L, Doglia M, Fassati LR, Tarenzi L, Galmarini D: Orthotopic transplantation of partially hepatectomized liver in the pig. Transplantation 43:362–365, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ishikura H, Tsuchimoto S, Misonou J, Natori T, Aizawa M: Leukocyte subsets infiltrating into fully allogeneic, longsurviving rat liver allografts. Transplantation 43:709–714, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kato H, Shimazu T: Effect of autonomic denervation on DNA synthesis during liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. Eur J Biochem 134:473–478, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  16. Caldwell-Kenkel JC, Currin RT, Tanaka Y, Thurman RG, Lemasters JJ: Kupffer cell activation and endothelial cell damage after storage of rat livers: Effects of reperfusion. Hepatology 13:83–95, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caldwell-Kenkel JC, Thurman RG, Lemasters JJ: Selective loss of non-parenchymal cell viability after cold ischemic storage of rat livers. Transplantation 45:834–837, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  18. McKeown CM, Edwards V, Phillips MJ, Harvey PRC, Petrunka CN, Strasberg SM: Sinusoidal lining cell damage: The critical injury in cold preservation of liver allografts in the rat. Transplantation 46:178–191, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jones EA, Summerfield JA: Kupffer cells.In The Liver: Biology and Pathobiology. M Arias, WB Jakoby, H Popper, D Schacter, DA Shafritz (eds). New York, Raven Press, 1988, pp 683–704.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhatnagar R, Schirmer R, Ernst M, Decker K: Superoxide release by zymosan-stimulated rat Kupffer cellsin vitro. Eur J Biochem 119:171–175, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karck U, Peters T, Decker K: The release of tumor necrosis factor from endotoxin-stimulated rat Kupffer cells is regulated by prostaglandin E2 and dexamethasone. J Hepatol 7:352–361, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cucchiaro G, Yamaguchi Y, Mills E, Kuhn CM, Anthony DC, Branum GD, Epstein R, Meyers WC: Evaluation of selective liver denervation methods. Am J Physiol 259:G781-G785, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shimazu T: Central nervous system regulation of liver and adipose tissue metabolism. Diabetologia 20:343–356, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hartmann H, Beckh K, Jungermann K: Direct control of glycogen metabolism in the perfused rat liver by the sympathetic innervation. Eur J Biochem 123:521–526, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmelck PH, Hanoune J: The hepatic adrenergic receptors. Mol Cell Biochem 33:35–48, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  26. Olsen PS, Kirkegaard PO, Poulsen SS, Nexo E: Adrenergic effects on exocrine secretion of rat submandibular epidermal growth factor. Gut 25:1234–1240, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silva JE, Larsen PR: Adrenergic activation of triiodothyronine production in brown adipose tissue. Nature 305:712–713, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ashrif S, Gillespie JS, Pollack D: The effects of drugs or denervation on thymidine uptake into rat regenerating liver. Eur J Pharmacol 29:324–327, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chiak A, Vaptzarova KI: Decreased synthesis of DNA in regenerating rat liver after administration of reserpine. Br J Pharmacol 49:253–257, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  30. MacManus JP, Braceland BM, Youdale T, et al: Adrenergic antagonists and a possible link between the increase in cAMP and DNA synthesis during liver regeneration. J Cell Physiol 82:157–164, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cruise JL, Knechtle SJ, Bollinger RR, Kuhn C, Michalopoulos G: Alpha1-adrenergic effects and liver regeneration. Hepatology 7:1189–1194, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holmin T, Ekelund M, Kullendorff CM, Lindfeldt J: A microsurgical method for denervation of the liver in the rat. Eur Surg Res 16:288–293, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  33. Greenway CV, Stark RD: Hepatic vascular bed. Physiol Rev 51:23–65, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  34. Richardson PD, Withrington PG: Physiological regulation of the hepatic circulation. Annu Rev Physiol 44:57–69, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weinbren K, Stirling GA, Washington SL, Hooper SB, Laughin J: Critical cytoplasmic mass and the initiation of the proliferative response in the rat liver. Br J Exp Pathol 52:583–588, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sakai A, Pfeffermann R, Kountz SL: Liver regeneration and lymphocyte activation. Surg Gyencol Obstet 143:914–918, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  37. Itoh H, Abo T, Sugawara S, Kanno A, Kumagai K: Age-related variation in the proportion and activity of murine liver natural killer cells and their cytotoxicity against regenerating hepatocytes. J Immunol 141:315–323, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  38. Francavilla A, Starzl TE, Barone M, Zeng QH, Porter KA, Zeevi A, Markus PM, van der Brink MR, Todo S: Studies on mechanisms of augmentation of liver regeneration by cyclosporine and FK 506. Hepatology 14:140–143, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mazzaferro V, Porter KA, Scotti-Foglini CL, Venkataramanan R, Makowka L, Rossaro L, Francavilla A, Todo S, Van Thiel DH, Starzl TE: The hepatotrophic influence of cyclosporine. Surgery 107:533–539, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kim YI, Nakashima K, Kawano K, Kobayashi M: Evidence that cyclosporine is hepatotoxic and hepatotrophic in 70% hepatectomized rats and mice. Eur Surg Res 22:231–237, 1990

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by Mika Fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kikuchi, N., Yamaguchi, Y., Mori, K. et al. Effect of cyclosporine on liver regeneration after orthotopic reduced-size hepatic transplantation in the rat. Digest Dis Sci 38, 1492–1499 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01308610

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01308610

Key Words

Navigation