Skip to main content
Log in

Electrical fusion of protoplasts from sycamore mutants and hybrid selection on hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (HAT) medium

  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

An electrical fusion method has been used to form somatic hybrids between protoplasts of two mutant cell lines of sycamore tissue culture cells. Both mutants will not grow in a hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (HAT) medium. It was possible to select the fused hybrids from homospecific fusion products and nonfused protoplasts by the use of HAT medium. In this way the viability and regeneration of the fused cells during the first few weeks of culture could be evaluated. An electron microscopic examination of the fusion process showed that it occurred at a series of points along the surface of the plasmalemma. Cytoplasmic bridges between the two cells were formed separated by vesicles which later dispersed to give complete cytoplasmic continuity between the cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates GW (1975) Electrical fusion for optimal formation of hetero-karyons inNicotiana. Planta 165: 217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Gaynor JJ, Shekhawat NS (1983) Fusion of plant protoplasts by electric fields. Plant Physiol 72: 1110–1113

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright SWJ, Northcote DH (1974) Protoplast regeneration from normal and bromodeoxymidine-resistant sycamore callus. J Cell Sci 16: 445–463

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1975) A deficiency of hypoxanthine phosphoriboxyltransferase in a sycamore callus resistant to azaguanine. Planta 123: 79–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J, Fleming EN (1974) Ultrastructural studies of the aggregation and fusion of plant protoplasts. Planta 118: 183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey MR, Clothier RH, Balls M, Cocking EC (1978) An ultrastructural study of fusion of cultured amphibian cells with higher plant protoplasts. Protoplasma 96: 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowke LC, Bech-Hansen CW, Gamborg OL, Shyluk JP (1973) Electron microscopic observation of cultured cells and protoplasts ofAmmi visnaga. Am J Bot 60 (4): 304–312

    Google Scholar 

  • —,Rennie PJ, Kirkpatrick JW, Constabel F (1975) Ultrastructural characteristics of intergeneric protoplast fusion. Can J Bot 53: 272–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL (1966) Aromatic metabolism in plants. II. Enzymes of the shikimate pathway in suspension culture of plant cells. Can J Biochem 44: 791–799

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harms CT, Potrykus I, Widholm JM (1980) Complementation and dominant expression of amino-acid analogue resistance markers in somatic hybrid clones fromDaucus carota after protoplast fusion. Z Pflanzenphysiol 101: 377–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutton S (1979) Studies of membrane fusion. III. Fusion of erythrocytes with polyethylene glycol. J Cell Sci 36: 61–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn H, Schieder R, Schierder O (1985) Somatic hybrids in Tobacco mediated by electrofusion. Plant Science 38: 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield JW (1964) Selection of hybrids from matings of fibroblastsin vitro and their presumed recombinants. Science 145: 709–710

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poste G, Allison AC (1973) Membrane fusion. Biochim Biophys Acta 300: 421–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prat R (1972) Contribution a l'étude des protoplastes végétaux. l. Effet due traitement d'isolement sur le structure cellulaire. J Microscopie 14: 85–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds ES (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque strain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 17: 208–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schieder O (1982) Somatic hybridization: a new method for plant improvement. In: Vasil IK et al (eds) Plant improvement and somatic cell genetics. Academic Press, New York, pp 239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Senda M, Takeda J, Abe S, Nakamura T (1969) Induction of cell fusion of plant protoplasts by electrical stimulation. Plant Cell Physiol 20 (7): 1441–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar MJ, Jones MGK (1985 a) Fusion characteristics of plant protoplasts in electrical field. Planta 165: 205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1985 b) Directed electrofusion between protoplasts with different responses in a mass fusion system. Plant Cell Reports 4: 92–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis GE, Hartmann JK, de Lamater ED (1977) Electron microscopic study of plant-animal cell fusion. Protoplasma 91: 1–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Withers LA, Cocking EC (1972) Fine structural studies on spontaneous and induced fusion of higher plant protoplasts. J Cell Sci 11: 59–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zachrisson A, Bornman Ch (1984) Application of electric field fusion in plant tissue culture. Physiol Plant 61: 314–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann U, Scheurich P (1981a) High frequency fusion of plant protoplasts by electric field. Planta 151: 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • — — (1981 b) Fusion ofAvena sativa mesophyll cell protoplasts by electrical breakdown. Biochim Biophys Acta 641: 160–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burlion, N., Northcote, D.H. Electrical fusion of protoplasts from sycamore mutants and hybrid selection on hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (HAT) medium. Protoplasma 138, 23–31 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01281181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01281181

Keywords

Navigation