Summary
Cut segments of stem and hypocotyl ofin vitro grown seedlings were incubated in 1% cellulase, 0.6 M mannitol and a salt solution at pH 5.5 for 10 hours. When these segments were left undisturbed the protoplasts formed did not escape into the enzyme solution which was removed by decantation. Also the tissue could be washed and liquid removed by decantation. Finally the protoplasts were released by shreding the tissue followed by gentle shaking. Undigested material was removed by sieving. The preparation thus obtained hardly had any cell requiring purification. In this way protoplasts could be obtained without centrifugation—a necessary evil in current techniques of harvesting of protoplast. These protoplasts readily regenerated if isolated from plants grown at 3,500 lux. The growth, however, did not proceed beyond a few-celled stage unless the pH was adjusted to 6.0. For sustained divisions osmotic concentration of the nutrient medium also had to be lowered to 0.5 M. This method, however, could not be applied to mesophyll protoplasts which required centrifugation for washing and purification resulting in heavy losses in yield and destabilization of protoplasts which failed to divide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnold, S. von, Eriksson, T., 1976: Factors influencing the growth and division of pea mesophyll protoplasts. Physiol. Plant.36, 193–196.
Bharal, Shashi, Rashid, A., 1979 a: Hypocotyl, stem, callus and leaves of the legumeVigna sinensis as systems for the isolation of protoplasts. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.91, 465–468.
— —, 1979 b: Regeneration of plants from tissue cultures of the legumeIndigofera enneapbylla. Linn. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.92, 443–447.
Binding, H., Nehls, R., 1978: Regeneration of isolated protoplasts ofVicia faba. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.88, 327–332.
Cocking, E. C., 1972: Plant cell protoplasts—isolation and development. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.23, 29–50.
Constabel, F., Kirkpatrick, J. W., Gamborg, O. L., 1973: Callus formation from mesophyll protoplasts ofPisum sativum. Canad. J. Bot.51, 2105–2106.
Davey, M. R., Bush, E., Power, J. B., 1974: Cultural studies of a dividing legume leaf protoplast system. Plant Sci. Letters3, 127–133.
Donn, G., 1978: Cell division and callus regeneration from leaf protoplasts ofVicia narbonensis. Z. Pflanzenphysiol.86, 65–75.
Gamborg, O. L., Eveleigh, D. E., 1968: Culture methods and detection of glucanases in suspension cultures of wheat and barley. Canad. J. Biochem.46, 417–421.
—,Shyluk, J., Kartha, K. K., 1975: Factors affecting the isolation and callus formation in protoplasts from the shoot apices ofPisum sativum L. Plant Sci. Letters4, 285–292.
Gosch, G., Bajaj, Y. P. S., Reinert, J., 1975: Isolation, culture and induction of embryogenesis in protoplasts from cell suspensions ofAtropa belladonna. Protoplasma86, 405–410.
Maretzki, A.,Nickell, L. G., 1973: Formation of protoplasts from sugarcane cell suspensions and the regeneration of cell cultures from protoplasts. In: Protoplastes et fusion de cellules somatiques végétales, pp. 51–63. Colloq. Intern: Centre Nat. Rech. Sci. Paris.
Pelcher, L. E., Gamborg, O. L., Kao, K. N., 1974: Bean mesophyll protoplasts: production, culture and callus formation. Plant Sci. Letters3, 107–111.
Potrykus, I., Harms, C. T., Lörz, H., Thomas, E., 1977: Callus formation from stem protoplasts of corn (Zea mays L.). Mol. gen. Genet.156, 347–350.
Street, H. E., 1977: Single-cell clones-derivation and selection. In: Plant tissue and cell culture (Street, H. E., ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bharal, S., Rashid, A. Isolation of protoplasts from stem and hypocotyl of the legumeVigna sinensis and some factors affecting their regeneration. Protoplasma 102, 307–313 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279594
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01279594