Skip to main content
Log in

Hedges in mathematics talk: Linguistic pointers to uncertainty

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analysis of transcripts of interviews with children aged 10 to 12, focused on a mathematical task designed to provoke prediction and generalisation, reveals a category of words (called hedges) associated with uncertainty. It is argued that these words — examples includeabout, around, maybe, think — are frequently deployed as a ‘Shield’ against accusation of error. The analysis draws on linguistic frameworks for categorising types of hedge, and for a theoretical account of how they might succeed in conveying uncertainty to listeners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley, J.: 1988, ‘Perceptions of teachers' questioning styles’, in Bourbàs, A. (ed.),Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vezprém, Hungary, Ferenc Genzwein, OOK, Vol. 1, pp. 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balacheff, N.: 1988, ‘Aspects of proof in pupils' practice of school mathematics’, in Pimm, D. (ed.),Mathematics, Teachers and Children. Hodder and Stoughton, London, pp. 216–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockway, D.: 1981, ‘Semantic constraints on relevance’, in Parrett, H., Sbisa, M. & Verschueren, J. (eds),Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: Proceedings of the Conference on Pragmatics at Urbino, July 8–14, 1979, Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 57–78.

  • Buxton, L.: 1981,Do You Panic about Mathematics?’, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channell, J. M.: 1980, ‘More on approximations’,Journal of Pragmatics 4, 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channell, J. M.: 1985, ‘Vagueness as a conversational strategy’,Nottingham Linguistic Circular 14, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channell, J. M.: 1990, ‘Precise and vague quantities in writing in economics’, in Nash, W. (ed.),The Writing Scholar: studies in the language and conventions of academic discourse, Sage Publications, Beverley Hills, pp. 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channell, J. M.: 1994,Vague Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J.: 1992,Estimation in Schools, Unpublished M. Phil. thesis, University of London.

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E. and Wood, T.: 1992, ‘Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 23, 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H.: 1978,Weeding and Sowing, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H.: 1981, ‘The clinical interview in psychological research on mathematical thinking: aims, rationales, techniques’,For the Learning of Mathematics 1(3), 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds),Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 13 Speech acts, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1989,Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W.: 1970, ‘The study of language in its social context’,Studium Generale 23, 30–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G.: 1972, ‘Hedges: a study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts’,Chicago Linguistic Society Papers, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 183–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, R.: 1973, ‘Questinable answers and answerable questions’, in Kachru, B. B.et al. (eds),Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry & Renée Kahane, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 453–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C.: 1983,Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J.: 1988,Learning and Doing Mathematics, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. and Pimm, D.: 1984, ‘Generic examples: seeing the general in the particular’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D.: 1992, ‘Classroom language and the teaching of mathematics’, in Nickson, M. and Lerman, S. (eds),The Social Context of Mathematics Education: theory and practice, South Bank University, London, pp. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, E. F., Frader, J. and Bosk, C.: 1982, ‘On hedging in physician-physician discourse’, in di Pietro, R. J. (ed.),Linguistics and the Professions, Ablex, Norwood, pp. 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T.: 1992, ‘Pointing with pronouns’,For the Learning of Mathematics 12(2), 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T.: (unpublished), ‘Children conveying uncertainty in estimation tasks’, Available from Homerton College, Cambridge.

  • Schiffrin, D.: 1987,Discourse Markers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and Wilson, D.: 1986,Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M.: 1986, ‘A matter of prolonged fieldwork: notes towards a modal grammar of English’,Applied Linguistics 7(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S. and Ross, G.: 1976, ‘The role of tutoring in problem solving’,Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (2), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.: 1965, ‘Fuzzy Sets’,Information and Control 8, 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowland, T. Hedges in mathematics talk: Linguistic pointers to uncertainty. Educ Stud Math 29, 327–353 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273910

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273910

Keywords

Navigation