Abstract
A constructivist-oriented inservice program provided teachers of mathematics (K-12) with intensive two-week summer institutes and weekly classroom follow-up. Pre- and post-program data on student outcomes indicate that, along with transformations in the nature and quality of mathematics activity in the classroom, students' beliefs about learning mathematics changed and elementary students' attitudes toward mathematics improved. Although the instruction they now received focused more on conceptual understanding and less on computational skill, students' scores on standardized tests assessing routine knowledge were maintained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiken, L.: 1974, ‘Two scales of attitude towards mathematics’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 5, 67–71.
Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., and Peterson, P.: 1988, ‘Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem solving in elementary arithmetic’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 19, 385–401.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., and Perlwitz, M.: ‘Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 22, 3–39.
Confrey, J.: 1985, ‘A constructivist view of mathematics instruction part I; a theoretical perspective’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Heid, K. M.:“Algebra with Computers”: A Description and an Evaluation of Student Performance and Attitudes. (Report submitted to the State College Area School District Board of Education). State College: Pennsylvania State University.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1989,Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: 1991,Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, National Council If Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.
Schifter, D. and Fosnot, C.: 1992,Reconstructing Mathematics Education: Stories of Teachers Meeting the Challenge of Reform, Teachers College Press, New York.
Schifter, D. and Simon, M.: 1992, ‘Assessing teachers' development of a constructivist view of mathematics learning’,Teaching and Teacher Education 8, 187–197.
Schoenfeld, A.: 1985, ‘Students' belief about mathematics and their effects on mathematical performance: A questionnaire analysis’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Simon, M.: 1989, ‘The impact of intensive classroom follow-up in a constructivist mathematics teacher education program’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, ERIC ED313351.
Simon, M. and Schifter, D.: 1991, ‘Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development’,Educational Studies in Mathematics 22, 309–331.
Von Glasersfeld, E.: 1983, ‘Learning as a constructive activity’,Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 41–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper appeared in R. Underhill (ed.),Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 1, 43–49, Backsburg, VI.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simon, M.A., Schifter, D. Toward a constructivist perspective: The impact of a mathematics teacher inservice program on students. Educ Stud Math 25, 331–340 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273905
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273905