Skip to main content
Log in

Nash equilibrium and the law of large numbers

  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pascoa (1993a) showed that the failure of the law of large numbers for a continuum of independent randomizations implies that Schmeidler's (1973) concept of a measure-valued profile function in equilibrium might not coincide with the concept of mixed strategies equilibrium of a nonatomic game. The latter should be defined as a probability measure on pure strategies profiles which is induced by the product measure of players' mixed strategies. This paper addresses existence and approximate purification of the latter and presents an assumption on continuity of payoffs that guarantees the equivalence between the two equilibrium concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali-Khan M (1986) Equilibrium points of nonatomic games over a Banach space. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 293, 2:737–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann R (1964) Mixed and behavior strategies in infinite extensive games. In: Advances in Game Theory, Ann. of Math. Studies, no. 52, Princeton University Press, pp. 627–650

  • Doob JL (1947) Probability in function space. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 53:15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman M, Gilles C (1985) An expository note on individual risk without aggregate uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 35:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Green E (1988) Limit stochastic processes for iid sequences of random variables. U. Pittsburg, mimeo

  • Haller H (1986) Equilibria of a class of nonatomic generalized games. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Working Paper

  • Halmos P (1950) Measure theory. Springer Verlag

  • Judd K (1985) The law of large numbers with a continuum of iid random variables. Journal of Economic Theory 35:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov A (1933) Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Ergebnisse der Mathematik 2, 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreisler H (1977) Hyperfinite model theory. In: Ghandi R, Hyland J (eds.) Logic Colloquium 1976, North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell A (1985) On a theorem of Schmeidler. Journal of Mathematical Economics 13:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoa M (1993a) Approximate equilibrium in pure strategies for nonatomic games. Journal of Mathematical Economics 22:223–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoa M (1993b) Noncooperative equilibrium and Chamberlinian monopolistic competition. Journal of Economic Theory 60:335–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoa M (1997) Monopolistic competition and non-neighboring goods. Economic Theory 9:129–142, revised version of CARESS Working Paper no. 14, 1986, University of Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D (1973) Equilibrium points of nonatomic games. Journal of Statistical Physics 7, 4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pascoa, M.R. Nash equilibrium and the law of large numbers. Int J Game Theory 27, 83–92 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01243196

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01243196

Key words

Navigation