Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Social animals exchange information during social interaction. The rate of interaction and, hence, the rate of information exchange, typically changes with density and density may be affected by the size of the social group. We investigate models in which each individual may be engaged in one of several tasks. For example, the different tasks could represent alternative foraging locations exploited by an ant colony. An individual's decision about which task to pursue depends both on environmental stimuli and on interactions among individuals. We examine how group size affects the allocation of individuals among the various tasks. Analysis of the models shows the following. (1) Simple interactions among individuals with limited ability to process information can lead to group behaviour that closely approximates the predictions of evolutionary optimality models, (2) Because per capita rates of social interaction may increase with group size, larger groups may be more efficient than smaller ones at tracking a changing environment, (3) Group behaviour is determined both by each individual's interaction with environmental stimuli and by social exchange of information. To keep these processes in balance across a range of group sizes, organisms are predicted to regulate per capita rates of social interaction and (4) Stochastic models show, at least in some cases, that the results described here occur even in small groups of approximately ten individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, E.S. (1990) Boundary disputes in the territorial antAzteca trigona: effects of asymmetries in colony size.Anim. Behav. 39 321–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, F.R. and Gordun, D.M. (1992) Information collection and spread by networks of patrolling ants.Am. Nat. 40 373–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.L. (1982) Optimal group size in territorial animals.J. Theor. Biol. 95 793–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabi, P. (1988) Behavioral flexibilty in Hymenoptera: a reconsideration of the concept of caste. InAdvances in Myrmecology. (J.C. Trager eds.) pp. 237–58. E.J. Brill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T. (1979) Time budgeting and group size: a theory.Ecology 61 611–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco, T. (1980) On foraging time allocation in a stochastic environment.Ecology 61 119–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartar, R.V. (1992) Adjustment of foraging effort and task switching in energy-manipulated wild bumblebee colonies.Anim Behav. 44 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, B.J. (1992) Short-term activity cycles in ants: age-related changes in tempo and colony synchrony.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31 181–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.L., Aron S., Goss, S., Pasteels, J.M. and Duernick, G. (1986) Random behaviour, amplification processes and number of participants: how they contribute to the foraging properties of ants.Physica D 22 176–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.L. and Goss, S. (1989) Collective patterns and decision making.Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneubourg, J.L., Aron, S., Goss, and Pasteels, J.M. (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant.J. Insect Behav. 31 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N.R., Bryant, S. and Griffiths, R. (1990) Synchronization of the behaviour within nests of the antLeptothorax acervorum (Fabricius) — I. Discovering the phenomenon and its relation to the level of starvation.Bull. Math. Biol. 52 597–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S.D. and Lucas, H.J. (1970) On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds.Acta Biotheor. 19 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau, L.A. and Gillis, D. (1985) Optimal group size can be stable: a reply to Sibly.Anim. Behav. 33 666–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. (1986) The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony.Anim. Behav. 34 1402–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. (1986) Group-level dynamics in harvester ants: young colonies and the role of patrolling.Anim. Behav. 35 833–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. (1989) Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants.Anim. Behav. 381 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. (1991) Behavioral flexibility and the foraging ecology of seed-eating ants.Am. Nat. 138 379–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. (1992) How colony growth affects forager intrusion in neighboring harvester ant colonies.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31 417–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M., Goodwin, B. and Trainor, L.E.H. (1992) A parallel distributed model of ant colony behaviour.J. Theor. Biol. 156 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M., Paul, R.E.H. and Thorpe, K. (1993) What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies?Anim. Behav. 45 1083–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler, B. (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey antMyrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9 301–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z.Y. and Robinson, G.E. (1992) Honeybee colony integration: worker—worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 89 11726–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaisson, P., Fresneau, D., Lauchard, J.-P. (1988) InInterindividual Variablity in Social Insects. (R.L. Jeanne) pp. 1–52, Boulder, Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R.L. (1986) The organization of work inPolybia occidentalis: the costs and benefits of specialization in a social wasp.Behav. Ecol. Sociobio. 19 333–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanne, R.L. (1987) Do water foragers pace nest construction activity inPolybia occidentalis? Experientia54 (Suppl.), 241–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, D.L. (1985) Are colonies supraoptimal groups?Anim. Behav. 33 1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs, P. and Dill, L.M. (1990)Mortality risk versus food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences.Ecology 71 886–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonacs, P. and Dill, L.M. (1991) Mortality risk versus food quality trade-offs in ants: patch use over time.Ecol. Entomol. 16 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, G. and Wilson, E.O. (1978)Caste and Ecology in Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, C., Sheel, D. and Pusey, A.E. (1990) Why lions form groups: food is not enough.Am. Nat. 136 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J.M., Deneubourg, J.-L., Goss, S. (1987) Self-organization mechanisms in ant collective societies (I): trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. InFrom Individual to collective behavior in social insects. (J.M. Pasteels and J.-L. Deneubourg eds.) pp. 155–75. Basel, Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasteels, J.M., Deneubourg, J.-L., Goss, S. (1988). Transmission and amplification of information in a changing environment: the case of insect societies. InLaw of nature and human conduct. (I. Prigogine and M. Sanglier eds.) pp. 129–56, G.O.R.D.E.S., Bruxelles

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, H.R. (1973) On the advantages of flocking.J. Theor. Biol. 38 419–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G.E. (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies.Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37 637–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Hempel, P. (1990) Reproductive competition and the evolution of work load in social insects.Am. Nat. 135 501–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.S. (1986) The vibration dance activity of successful foragers of the honeybee,Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae).J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 59 699–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T.D. (1986) Social foraging by honeybees 2. How colonies allocate foragers among patches of flowers.Behav. Ecol. and Sociobiol. 19 343–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T.D. (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24 181–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T.D., Camazine, S. and Sneyd, J. (1991) Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28 277–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topoff, H. and Mirenda, J. (1978) Precocial behaviour of callow workers of the army antNeivamyrmex nigrescens: importance of stimulation by adults during mass recruitment.Anim. Behav. 26 698–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel, W.R. (1988) Colony growth and the ontogeny of worker polymorphism in the fire ant,Solenopsis invicta.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22 103–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P. (1984) ‘Chance’ and mixed-species associations.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1962) Chemical communication among workers of the fire antSolenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith) 1. The organization of mass foraging.Anim. Behav. 10 134–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1971)The Insect Societies. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, T.J. and Schmid-Hempel, P. (1990) On the integration of individual foraging strategies with colony ergonomics in social insects: nectar-collection in honeybees.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27 103–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pacala, S.W., Gordon, D.M. & Godfray, H.C.J. Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation. Evol Ecol 10, 127–165 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241782

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241782

Keywords

Navigation