Summary
We present a mathematical model for predicting the expected fitness of phenotypically plastic organisms experiencing a variable environment. We assume that individuals experience two discrete environments probabilistically in time (as a Markov process) and that there are two different phenotypic states, each yielding the highest fitness in one of the two environments. We compare the expected fitness of a phenotypically fixed individual to that of an individual whose phenotype is induced to produce the better phenotype in each environment with a time lag between experiencing a new environment and realization of the new phenotype. Such time lags are common in organisms where phenotypically plastic, inducible traits have been documented. We find that although plasticity is generally adaptive when time lags are short (relative to the time scale of environmental variability), plasticity can be disadvantageous for longer lag times. Asymmetries in environmental change probabilities and/or the relative fitnesses of each phenotype strongly influence whether plasticity is favoured. In contrast to other models, our model does not require costs for plasticity to be disadvantageous; costs affect the results quantitatively, not qualitatively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, F.R. and Harvell, C.D. (1990) Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic environments.Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 407–10.
Adler, F.R. and Karban, R. (1994) Defended fortresses or moving targets? Another model of induced defenses inspired my military metaphores.Am. Nat. 144 813–32.
Åstro(7F)m, M. and Lundberg, P. (1994) Plant defence and stochastic risk of herbivory.Evol. Ecol. 8 288–98.
Bernays, E. (1986) Diet-induced head allometry among foliage-chewing insects and its importance for granivores.Science 231 495–7.
Bradshaw, A.D. (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants.Adv. Genet. 13 115–55.
Buss, L.W. and Grosberg, R.K. (1990) Morphogenic basis for phenotypic differences in hydroid competitive behavior.Nature 343 63–6.
Clark, C.W. and Harvell, C.D. (1992) Inducible defenses and the allocation of resources: a minimal model.Am. Nat. 139 521–39.
Cohen, D. (1967) Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcome.J. Theor. Biol. 16 1–14.
Dempster, E.R. (1955) Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20 25–32.
Dodson, S.I. and Havel, J.E. (1988) Indirect prey effects: some morphological and life history responses ofDaphnia pulex exposed toNotonecta undulata.Limnol. Oceanogr. 33 1274–85.
Fagen, R. (1987) Phenotypic plasticity and social environment.Evol. Ecol. 1 263–71.
Greene, E. (1989). A diet-induced developmental polymorphism in a caterpillar.Science 243 643–6.
Harvell, C.D. (1986) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses in a marine bryozoan: cues, costs, and consequences.Am. Nat. 128 810–23.
Harvell, C.D. (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses.Q. Rev. Biol. 65 323–40.
Harvell, C.D. and Padilla, D.K. (1990) Inducible morphology, heterochrony, and size hierarchies in a colonial invertebrate monoculture.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 508–12.
Havel, J.E. (1987) Predator-induced defenses: a review. InPredation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities (W.C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, eds), pp. 263–78. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH.
Hoel, P.G., Port, S.C. and Stone, C.J. (1972)Introduction to Stochastic Processes. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
Houston, A.I. and McNamara, J.M. (1992) Phenotypic plasticity as a state-dependent life-history decision.Evol. Ecol. 6 243–53.
Karban, R. and Myers, J.H. (1989) Induced plant responses to herbivory.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20 331–48.
León, J.A. (1993) Plasticity in fluctuating environments. InAdaptation in stochastic environments (J. Yoshimura and C.W. Clark, eds), pp. 105–21. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Levins, R. (1968)Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Lively, C.M. (1986a) Predator-induced shell dimorphism in the acorn barnacle,Chthamalus anisopoma.Evolution 40 232–42.
Lively, C.M. (1986b) Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially variable environment.Am. Nat. 128 561–72.
Meyer, A. (1987) Phenotypic plasticity and heterochrony inCichlasoma manaquense (Pisces, Cichlidae) and their implications for speciation in cichlid fishes.Evolution 41 1357–69.
Moran, N.A. (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes.Am. Nat. 139 971–89.
Palumbi, S.R. (1984) Tactics of acclimation: morphological changes of sponges in an unpredictable environment.Science 225 1478–80.
Scheiner, S.M. (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24 35–68.
Schlichting, C.D. (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17 667–93.
Schlichting, C.D. (1989) Phenotypic integration and environmental change.Bioscience 39 460–4.
Sebens, K.P. and Miles, J.S. (1988) Sweeper tentacles in a gorgonian octocoral: morphological modifications for interference competition.Biol. Bull. 175 378–87.
Shapiro, A.M. (1976) Seasonal polyphenism. InEvolutionary biology, (M.K. Hecht, W.C. Steere and B. Wallace, eds), Vol. 9, pp. 259–333. Plenum Press, New York.
Smith, L.D. and Palmer, A.R. (1994) Effects of manipulated diet on size and performance of brachyuran crab claws.Science 264 710–12.
Smith-Gill, S.J. (1983) Developmental plasticity: developmental conversionversus phenotypic modulation.Am. Zool. 23 47–55.
Stearns, S.C. (1989) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity.Bioscience 39 436–45.
Stemberger, R.S. and Gilbert, J.J. (1987) Multiple species induction of morphological defense in the rotifer,Keratella testudo.Ecology 68 370–8.
Sultan, S.E. (1987) Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants.Evol. Biol. 21 127–78.
Thompson, D.B. (1992) Consumption rates and the evolution of diet-induced plasticity in the head morphology ofMelanoplus femurrubrum (Orthoptera: Acridadae).Oecologia 89 204–13.
Thompson, J.D. (1991) Phenotypic plasticity as a component of evolutionary change.Trends Ecol. Evol. 6 246–9.
Van Alstyne, K.L. (1988) Herbivore grazing increases polyphenolic defenses in the intertidal brown algaFucus distichus.Ecology 69 655–63.
Van Tienderen, P.H. (1991) Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments.Evolution 45 1317–23.
Via, S. (1984) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore: II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and across host plants.Evolution 38 896–905.
West-Eberhard, M.J. (1989) Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20 249–78.
Wimberger, P. (1991) Plasticity of jaw and skull morphology in the neotropical cichlidsGeophagus brasiliensis andG. steindachneri.Evolution 45 1545–63.
Yoshimura, J. and Clark, C.W. (1991) Individual adaptations in stochastic environments.Evol. Ecol. 5 173–92.
Yoshimura, J. and Clark, C.W. (eds) (1993)Adaptation in Stochastic Environments. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Padilla, D.K., Adolph, S.C. Plastic inducible morphologies are not always adaptive: The importance of time delays in a stochastic environment. Evol Ecol 10, 105–117 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239351
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239351