Summary
We compare the dynamics of predator-prey systems with specialist predators or adaptive generalist predators that base diet choice on energy-maximizing criteria. Adaptive predator behaviour leads to functional responses that are influenced by the relative abundance of alternate prey. This results in the per capita predation risk being positively density-dependent near points of diet expansion. For a small set of parameter values, systems with adaptive predators can be locally stable whereas systems with specialist predators would be unstable. This occurs mainly when alternate prey have low enough profitability that predators cannot sustain themselves indefinitely when feeding on alternate prey. Local stability of systems with adaptive predator behaviour is inversely related to the goodness of fit to optimal diet choice criteria. Hence, typical patterns of partial prey preference are more stabilizing than perfect optimal diet selection. Locally stable systems with adaptive predators are often globally unstable, converging on limit cycles for many initial population densities. The small range of parameter combinations and initial population densities leading to stable equilibria suggest that adaptive diet selection is unlikely to be a ubiquitous stabilizing factor in trophic interactions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, P. (1982) Functional responses of optimal foragers.Am. Nat. 120, 382–90.
Abrams, P. (1987a) The functional responses of adaptive consumers of two resources.Theor. Pop. Biol. 32, 262–88.
Abrams, P. (1987b) Indirect interactions between species that share a predator: varieties of indirect effects. InPredation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities (W.C. Kerfoot and A. Sih, eds), pp. 38–54. University of New England Press, Dartmouth.
Abrams, P. (1990) The effects of adaptive behavior on the type-2 functional response.Ecology 71, 877–85.
Abrams, P. (1993) Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behaviour in a two-prey-one-predator system.Evol. Ecol. 7, 312–26.
Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M. L. and Pinshow, B. (1991) The shape of a gerbil isocline: an experimental field study using principles of optimal habitat selection.Ecology 72, 328–40.
Akre, B.G. and Johnson, D.M. (1979) Switching and sigmoid functional response curves by damselfly naiads with alternative prey available.J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 703–20.
Charnov, E.L. (1976) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid.Am. Nat. 110, 141–51.
Chesson, P.L. and Murdoch, W.W. (1986) Aggregation of risk: relationships among host—parasitoid models.Am. Nat. 127, 696–715.
Colton, T.F. (1987) Extending functional response models to include a second prey type: an experimental test.Ecology 68, 900–12.
Comins, H.N. and Hassell, M.P. (1976) Predation in multi-prey communities,J. Theor. Biol. 62, 93–114.
Comins, H.N. and Hassell, M.P. (1979) The dynamics of optimally foraging predators and parasitoids.J. Anim. Ecol. 48, 335–51.
Fryxell, J.M. and Doucet, C.M. (1993) Diet choice and the functional response of beavers.Ecology 74, 1297–306.
Fryxell, J.M. and Lundberg, P. (1993) Optimal patch use and metapopulation dynamics.Evol. Ecol. 7, 379–93.
Fryxell, J.M., Vamosi, S.M., Walton, R.A. and Doucet, C.M. (1994) Retention time and the functional response of beavers.Oikos (in press).
Gleeson, S.K. and Wilson, D.S. (1986) Equilibrium diet: optimal foraging and prey coexistence.Oikos 46, 139–44.
Hassell, M.P. and Pacala, S.W. (1990) Heterogeneity and the dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 330, 203–20.
Hastings, A. and Powell, T. (1991) Chaos in a three-species food chain.Ecology 72, 896–903.
Holt, R.D. (1983) Optimal foraging and the form of the predator isocline.Am. Nat. 122, 521–41.
Kareiva, P. (1990) Population dynamics in spatially-complex environments: theory and data.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B330, 175–90.
Krebs, J.R. and McCleery, R.H. (1984) Optimization in behavioural ecology. InBehavioural ecology (J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, eds), pp. 91–121, Blackwell, Oxford.
MacArthur, R.H. and Pianka, E.R. (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment.Am. Nat. 100, 603–9.
McNair, J.N. (1986) The effects of refuges on predator—prey interactions: a reconsideration.Theor. Pop. Biol. 29, 38–63.
McNair, J.N. (1987) A reconciliation of simple and complex models of age-dependent predation.Theor. Pop. Biol. 32, 383–92.
Mangel, M. and Roitberg, B.D. (1992) Behavioral stabilization of host—parasite population dynamics.Theor. Pop. Biol. 42, 308–20.
May, R.M. (1972) Limit cycles in predator—prey communities.Science 177, 900–2.
May, R.M. (1974)Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems Princeton University Press, Princeton.
May, R.M. (1978) Host—parasitoid systems in patchy environments: a phenomenological model.J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 833–43.
Mitchell, W.A. and Brown, J. S. (1990) Density-dependent harvest rates by optimal foragers.Oikos 57, 180–90.
Murdoch, W.W. (1973) The functional response of predators.J. Appl. Ecol. 14, 335–41.
Murdoch, W.W., and Oaten, A. (1975) Predation and population stability.Adv. Ecol. Res. 9, 2–131.
Murdoch, W.W., Nisbet, R.M., Blythe, S.P., Gurney, W.S., and Reeve, J.D. (1987) An invulnerable age class and stability in delay-differential parasitoid—host models.Am. Nat. 129, 263–82.
Pacala, S.W., Hassell, M.P. and May, R.M. (1990) Host—parasitoid associations in patchy environments.Nature 344, 150–3.
Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T. (1988)Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Pulliam, H.R. (1980) Do chipping sparrows forage optimally?Ardea 68, 75–82.
Pulliam, H.R. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation.Am. Nat. 132, 652–61.
Pulliam, H.R. and Danielson, B.J. (1991) Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics.Am. Nat. 137, S50–66.
Ranta, E. and Nuutinen, V. (1985) Foraging by the smooth newt (Triturus vulgaris) on zooplankton: functional responses and diet choice.J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 275–93.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time.Science 171, 385–7.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1977) Aspects of biological exploitation.Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 371–80.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1981) A theory of habitat selection.Ecology 62, 327–35.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1986) Hummingbird isolegs in an experimental system.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 313–22.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1991) Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism.Am. Nat. 137, S5–28.
Rosenzweig, M.L. and MacArthur, R.H. (1963) Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator—prey interactions.Am. Nat. 97, 209–23.
Sih, A. (1984) Optimal behavior and density-dependent predation.Am. Nat. 123, 314–26.
Sih, A. (1987) Prey refuges and predator—prey stability.Theor. Pop. Biol. 31, 1–12.
Stephens, D.W. (1985) How important are partial preferences?Anim. Behav. 33, 667–9.
Stephens, D.W. and Krebs, J.R. (1986)Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Tanner, J.T. (1975) The stability and the intrinsic growth rates of prey and predator populations.Ecology 56, 855–67.
Tansky, M. (1978) Switching effect in predator—prey system.J. Theor. Biol. 70, 263–71.
Taylor, A.D. (1988) Large-scale spatial structure and population dynamics in arthropod predator—prey systems.Ann. Zool. Fenn. 25, 63–74.
Yodzis, P. (1989)Introduction to Theoretical Ecology. Harper and Row, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fryxell, J.M., Lundberg, P. Diet choice and predator—prey dynamics. Evol Ecol 8, 407–421 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238191
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238191