Skip to main content
Log in

The all-pay auction with complete information

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Economic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In a (first price) all-pay auction, bidders simultaneously submit bids for an item. All players forfeit their bids, and the high bidder receives the item. This auction is widely used in economics to model rent seeking, R&D races, political contests, and job promotion tournaments. We fully characterize equilibrium for this class of games, and show that the set of equilibria is much larger than has been recognized in the literature. When there are more than two players, for instance, we show that even when the auction is symmetric there exists a continuum of asymmetric equilibria. Moreover, for economically important configurations of valuations, there is no revenue equivalence across the equilibria; asymmetric equilibria imply higher expected revenues than the symmetric equilibrium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baye, M. R., de Vries, C. G.: Mixed strategy trade equilibria. Canadian Journal of Economics25, 281–293 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M. R., Kovenock, D., de Vries, C. G.: The all-pay auction with complete information. CentER Discussion Paper 9051, 1990

  • Baye, M. R., Kovenock, D., de Vries, C. G.: It takes two to tango: equilibria in a model of sales. Games and Economic Behavior4, 493–510 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baye, M. R., Kovenock, D., de Vries, C. G.: Rigging the lobbying process: an application of the all-pay auction. American Economic Review83, 289–294 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani, S., Riley, J. G.: Equilibria in open common value auctions. Journal of Economic Theory 101–130 (1991)

  • Broecker, T.: Credit-worthiness tests and interbank competition. Econometrica58, 429–452 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. A., Heydra, B. J.: Rent-seeking and the privatization of the commons. European Journal of Political Economy6, 41–59 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, C., Schotter, A., Weigelt, K.: Tournaments and price rates: an experimental study. Journal of Political Economy95, 1–33 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P.: The theory of technological competition. In: J. E. Stiglitz and G. F. Mathewson (eds.) New developments in the analysis of market structure, pp. 519–547. Cambridge: MIT Press 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneckere, R., Kovenock, D., Lee, R. E.: A model of price leadership based on consumer loyalty. Journal of Industrial Economics40, 147–156 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennert, T.: Price competition between market makers. Review of Economic Studies60, 735–752 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.: Strategic behavior in contests. American Economic Review,77, 891–898 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W. R.: The cost of rent seeking: is GNP negative? Journal of Political Economy99, 660–664 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen, T.: Strategic buyers and the social cost of monopoly. American Economic Review81, 660–664 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundenberg, D., Tirole, J.: Understanding rent dissipation: on the use of game theory in industrial organization. American Economic Review77, 176–183 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K., Weiss, A., Wilson, C.: The war of attrition in continuous time with complete information. International Economic Review29, 663–680 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L.: The political economy of protectionism. Harwood: New York 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L., Riley, J. G.: Politically contestable rents and transfers. Economics and Politics1, 17–39 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. L., Samet, D.: Dissipation of contestable rents by small numbers of contenders. Public Choice54, 63–82 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E. P., Rosen, S.: Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy89, 341–364 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee, S. P., Brock, W.A., Young, L.: Black hole tariffs and endogenous policy theory, political economy in general equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P.: Rational expectations, information acquisition, and competitive bidding. Econometrica49, 921–944 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H.: Game theory of the social sciences, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press 1986a

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H.: Eighty-nine exercises with solutions from game theory for the social sciences, 2nd edn. New York: New York University Press 1986b

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff, B. J., Stiglitz, J. E.: Prizes and incentives: towards a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell Journal of Economics13, 21–43 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, C.: Competitive promotional strategies. Journal of Business61, 427–449 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, J. S., Scrinvasan, V., Lal, R.: The effects of brand loyalty on competitive price promotional strategies. Management Science36, 276–304 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, W.: The social costs of monopoly and regulation: a game theoretical analysis. Bell Journal of Economics13, 391–401 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S.: Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. American Economic Review76, 701–715 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. M.: Election goals and the allocation of campaign resources. Econometrica57, 637–660 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G.: Efficient rent seeking. In: J. Buchanan et al. (eds.) Toward a theory of the rent seeking society. College Station: Texas A&M University Press 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.: A model of sales. American Economic Review70, 651–659 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. J.: Auctions and competitive bidding. In: H. P. Young (ed.) Fair allocation, pp. 143–170. American Mathematical Society 1985

  • Wenders, J. T.: On perfect rent dissipation. American Economic Review77, 456–459 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Jacques Crémer, Chuangyin Dang, Jürgen Dennert, Chaim Fershtman, Martin Hellwig, Arthur Robson, Heinrich Ursprung, Eric van Damme, Ton Vorst, and the referees for helpful comments. We benefitted from presentations at the World Congress of the Econometric Society in Barcelona, the European Meeting on the Economics of Information at Tilburg University, the Midwest Mathematical Economics Meetings at the University of Illinois, and seminars at Texas A&M University, The Pennsylvania State University, Tilburg University and the University of Montreal. Baye is grateful for support from the CentER for Economic Research at Tilburg University and the Tinbergen Institute where earlier versions of this paper were completed. Kovenock acknowledges support from Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, the Tinbergen Institute, the Center for Economic Studies at the University of Munich, the Institut d'Analisi Economica CSIC at the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, the Krannert School of Management, and the Jay N. Ross Young Faculty Scholar Award.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baye, M.R., Kovenock, D. & de Vries, C.G. The all-pay auction with complete information. Econ Theory 8, 291–305 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211819

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01211819

JEL classification numbers

Navigation