Skip to main content
Log in

The international 10–20 system revisited: Cartesian and spherical co-ordinates

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Methods like dipole source localization require an exact specification of the co-ordinates of electrode positions. Different values for the co-ordinates of F3, F4, P3 and P4 are encountered in literature. This is due to the,unexpected complexity of the calculations involved and aggravated by an inaccurate but widely used control procedure for the placement of these electrodes. We present a table of co-ordinates for the 10–20 system together with a method for determining the co-ordinates of mid-way positions within the 10–20 system. The consequence of using erroneous co-ordinates on the accuracy of dipole source localization is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cooper, R., Osselton, J.W. and Shaw, J.C. EEG technology. Butterworths, London. 1980 (3rd edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, G.D. Auto-correlation and automatic integration. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1954, Suppl. 4: 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Munck, J.C., Vijn, P.C.M. and Spekreijse, H. A practical method for determining electrode positions on the head. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1991, 78: 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echallier, J.F., Perrin, F. and Pernier, J. Computer-assisted placement of electrodes on the human head. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1992, 82: 160–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper H.H. The 10–20 electrode system of the International Federation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1958, 10: 370–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh R.H., Darcey, T.M., Lehmann D. and Fender, D.H. Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain. IEEE-BME, 1978, 25: 421–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, S.K. and Nunez, P.L. Quantitative representation of the upper surface of the human head. Brain Topography, 1991, 3: 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., Giard, M.-H. and Echalier, J.F. Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1987, 66: 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, S. and Discroll, D.A. Current distribution in the brain from surface electrodes. Anesth. Analg., 1968, 47: 717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thickbroom, G.W., Mastaglia, F.L. and Carroll, W.M. Spatiotemporal mapping of evoked cerebral activity, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1984, 59: 425–431.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koen B. E. Böcker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Böcker, K.B.E., van Avermaete, J.A.G. & van den Berg-Lenssen, M.M.C. The international 10–20 system revisited: Cartesian and spherical co-ordinates. Brain Topogr 6, 231–235 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187714

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01187714

Key words

Navigation