Skip to main content
Log in

On the “emotional” qualities of certain types of cognition: A reply to arguments for the independence of cognition and affect

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zajonc (1980, 1984b) has argued that affect has many properties not shared by cognition and that affect is the product of a separate, partially independent system. His position has been understood as implying that cognitive therapy is essentially misguided in attempting to modify emotional disorders. In the present article we justify the approach taken by cognitive therapy by making distinctions among different types of cognition and demonstrating that certain of these types have precisely those properties that Zajonc claimed to be unique to affect. Cognition that is unconscious and automatic can, for example, be effortless and uncontrollable, be influenced by drugs and hormones, be irrevocable by deliberate thought, and so forth. It thus seems possible that such types of cognition can be part of affective responses and can play a role in producing these “emotional” qualities. Therefore, a secure theoretical basis exists for using cognitive therapy to treat affective disorders. Examining several recent advances in understanding and treating pathological affects supports this analysis, revealing that each succeeds by differentiating types of cognition and their role in emotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angrist, B., Sathananthan, G., Wilk, S., & Gershon, S. (1974). Amphetamine psychosis: Behavioral and biochemical aspects.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 11 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baars, B. J. (1981).Cognitive versusinference.American Psychologist, 36 223–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1977). Menstrual hormone changes and instinctual tendencies in dreams.Motivation and Emotion, 1 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bate, W. J. (1946).From classic to romantic: Premises of taste in eighteenth-century England. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumer, F. L. (1973). Romanticism (ca. 1780-ca. 1830). In P. P. Wiener (Ed.),Dictionary of the history of ideas (Vol. 4, pp. 198–204). New York: Scribner's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: Meridian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H. (1981). Thinking and feeling: A skeptical review.American Psychologist, 36 99–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1979a). One-mediator model of exposure effects is still viable.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1090–1096.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1979b). Stimulus recognition may mediate exposure effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist, 36 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. B. (1941).The philosophy of Schleiermacher: The development of his theory of scientific and religious knowledge. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1972).Language and mind (rev. ed.). New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H. (1964).Memory. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1982). A reappraisal of rational-emotive therapy's theoretical foundations and therapeutic methods: A reply to Eschenroeder.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschenroeder, C. (1982). How rational is rational-emotive therapy? A critical appraisal of its theoretical foundations and therapeutic methods.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1 288–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information.Psychological Bulletin, 99 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1968). The appeal to tacit knowledge in psychological explanation.Journal of Philosophy, 65 627–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (1981).Representations: Philosophical essays on the foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Safran, J. D. (1984). Integrating affect and cognition: A perspective on the process of therapeutic change.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 559–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollon, S. D., DeRubeis, R. J., & Evans, M. D. (1987). Causal mediation of change in treatment for depression: Discrimination between nonspecificity and noncausality.Psychological Bulletin, 102 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized.Science, 207 557–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 6 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1981). A cognitivist's reply to Zajonc on emotion and cognition.American Psychologist, 36 222–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.American Psychologist, 37 1019–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition.American Psychologist, 39 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., Coyne, J. C., & Folkman, S. (1984). Cognition, emotion and motivation: The doctoring of Humpty-Dumpty. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 221–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1984). A perceptual motor theory of emotion. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 271–291). Hillsdale, NJ: E

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39 367–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition: The seventeenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1984).Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Van Zandt, B. J. S. (1987). Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13 646–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1983). Knowing and liking.Motivation and Emotion, 7 125–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellers, B. A. (1981). Feeling more than thinking (Comment).American Psychologist, 36 802–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1977). Exposure effects may not depend on stimulus recognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1085–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novaco, R. W. (1975).Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W. G. (1988). The role of cognition in emotional experience. In W. J. Baker, L. P. Mos, H. V. Rappard, & H. J. Stam (Eds.),Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 327–337). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W. G., & Sabini, J. (1984, September). Cognitive defects, emotion, and action. In M. Frese & W. Hacker (Chairs),Cognitive and motivational aspects of goal directed action. Symposium conducted at the XXIII International Congress of Psychology, Acapulco.

  • Plutchik, R. (1985). On emotion: The chicken-and-egg problem revisited.Motivation and Emotion, 9 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1973).Cognitive: An introduction. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1981). The primacy of affect: Some theoretical implications.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1984). A reassessment of the “primacy of affect.”Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., Lepper, M. R., & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 880–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Woudzia, L. (1986). Affective judgements, common sense, and Zajonc's thesis of independence.Motivation and Emotion, 10 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk, H. G. (1966).The mind of the European romantics: An essay in cultural history. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiermacher, F. D. E. (1955).On religion: Speeches to its cultured despisers (J. Oman, Trans.). New York: Frederick Ungar. (Original work published 1799)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schul, Y., & Burnstein, E. (1985). When discounting fails: Conditions under which individuals use discredited information in making a judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 894–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 84 127–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, A. D., Garfield, S. L., & Murphy, G. E. (1984). The process of change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy: Changes in mood and cognition.Archives of General Psychiatry, 41 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18 643–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1907).Outlines of psychology. Leipzig: Wilhelm Englemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1981). An information-processing perspective oon social attribution. In J. H. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.),New directions in attribution research (Vol. 3, pp. 359–404). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist, 35 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1981). A one-factor mind about mind and emotion.American Psychologist, 36 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1984a). The interaction of affect and cognition. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.),Approaches to emotion (pp. 239–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1984b). On the primacy of affect.American Psychologist, 35 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., & Markus, H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences.Journal of Consumer Research, 9 123–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B., Pietromonaco, P., & Bargh, J. (1982). Independence and interaction of affect and cognition. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition: The seventeenth annual Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 211–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parrott, W.G., Sabini, J. On the “emotional” qualities of certain types of cognition: A reply to arguments for the independence of cognition and affect. Cogn Ther Res 13, 49–65 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01178489

Key words

Navigation