Skip to main content

The Turn to Affect: Emotions Without Subjects, Causality Without Demonstrable Cause

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism
  • 1861 Accesses

Abstract

Probing the theoretical implications of claims, championed by Brian Massumi and Patricia Clough , that affect is physiological and pre-subjective, this chapter argues that if the personal history that comes with emotion is subsumed into affects so construed, then the subject is twice removed: once in the stripping down of emotion to affect; and again in the shift in political and social analysis from consensus to contagion. A turn to affect that entails a turn away from conventional rationality risks leaving behind concepts like the human, the subject, and agency , and so put at risk the ability to define the social and affect in ways that enable them to do meaningful work. Having effects is not quite the same as being efficacious, for ubiquitous effects threaten to make them inconsequential by mystifying causality. To address this danger, the chapter proposes a theory of affect that at least gives it the possibility of recognizing the value of further cognitive processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Altieri, Charles. “Affect, Intentionality, and Cognition: A Response to Ruth Leys.” Critical Inquiry 38, no. 4 (2012): 878–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, Dan. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions. New York: Harper Perennial, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Paul. Against Empathy. New York: HarperCollins, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Teresa. The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Cheshire. “Subjectivity and Emotion.” In Thinking about Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, edited by Robert Solomon, 107–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Patricia Ticineto, editor. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Thomas. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, John. “Emotion and Action.” In Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, edited by Robert Solomon, 151–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, Michael L. The Enlightenment of Sympathy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, Margaret. Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Steven. Blake’s Agitation: Criticism and the Emotions. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, Melissa and Gregory J. Seigworth, editors. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Paul E. What Emotions Really Are. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Daniel M. The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Ernest Mossner. London: Penguin Books, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, Eric R. The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain. New York: Random House, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, Christine M. The Sources of Normativity. Edited by Onora O’Neill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, Joseph. The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennard, Natasha and Cary Wolfe. “Is Humanism Really Humane?.” New York Times, January 9, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/09/opinion/is-humanism-really-humane.html.

  • Leys, Ruth. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry 37, no. 3 (2011): 434–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. “The Future Birth of the Affective Fact: The Political Ontology of Fact.” The Affective Theory Reader, edited by Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 52–70. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Parables of the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Politics of Affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazar, Hina. Enlightened Sentiments: Judgment and Autonomy in the Age of Sensibility. New York: Fordham University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, Sianne. Ugly Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otis, Laura. Rethinking Thought: Inside the Minds of Creative Scientists and Artists. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, Jaak. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, Jaak and Lucy Biven. The Archaeology of Mind: Neuroevolutionary Origins of Human Emotion. New York: Norton, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plamper, Jan. The History of Emotions: An Introduction. Translated by Keith Tribe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Dover, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, Silvan. Affect Imagery Consciousness. New York: Springer, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sha, R.C. (2017). The Turn to Affect: Emotions Without Subjects, Causality Without Demonstrable Cause. In: Wehrs, D., Blake, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics