Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing affective states: A new methodology for some old problems

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Demand characteristics and reactivity can jeoparadize the validity of adjective checklists. The present studies test a methodology for distïnguishing among positive, neutral, and negative states, while minimizing demand and reactivity. Results from the studies revealed that ratings of neutral words accurately discriminated among college students induced to feel happy, neutral, or sad. In addition, independent judges demonstrated that assessing mood with ratings of neutral words weakens the link between scale items and to-be-measured mood state, thus minimizing potential demand and reactivity. Ratings of neutral words are discussed as an alternative to adjective checklists regarding measurement of affective states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 99 229–246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., Monteiro, K. P., & Gilligan, S. P. (1978). Emotional mood as a context for learning caused by emotional states.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17 573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. C. (1985). On the importance of mood intensity and encoding demands in memory: Commentary on Hasher, Rose, Zacks, Sanft, and Doren.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114 392–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, D., Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Isen, A. M. (1979). Helping as a function of feeling state and nature of the helping behavior.Motivation and Emotion, 3 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. O., Graf, M., & Becker, J. (1979). Self-devaluation and depressed mood.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47 958–962.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. O., & Green, M. L. (1982). Velten mood induction procedure effects: Duration and postexperimental removal.Personality and Social Psychology, Bulletin, 8 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotlib, I. H., & Meyer, J. P. (1986). Factor analysis of the multiple affect adjective checklist: A separation of positive and negative effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50 1161–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasher, L., Rose, K. C., Zacks, R. T., Sanft, S., & Doren, B. (1985). Mood, recall, and selectivity effects in normal college students.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114 106–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E. (1984a). Toward an information-processing analysis of depression.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 443–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, R. E. (1984b). Information processing and feedback: Effects of mood and information favorability on cognitive processing of personality information.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect and cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M. (1985). Asymmetry of happiness and sadness in effects on memory in normal college students: Comment on Hasher, Rose, Zacks, Sanft, and Doren.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114 388–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., Clark, M. S., Shalker, T. E., & Karp, L. (1978). Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: A cognitive loop?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17 573–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Shalker, T. E. (1982). The effect of feeling state on evaluation of positive, neutral, and negative stimuli: When you “Accentuate the positive,” do you “Eliminate the negative”?Social Psychology Quarterly, 45 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 236–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leight, K. A., & Ellis, H. C. (1981). Emotional states, strategies, and state-dependent memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D. (1986). How mood influences cognition. In N. E. Sharkey (Ed.),Advances in cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 290–314). New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., & Bower, G. H. (1985). Naturally occurring mood and learning: Commentary on Hasher et al.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114 396–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasby, W., & Yando, R. (1982). Selective encoding and retrieval of affectively valent information: Two cognitive consequences of children's mood states.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 1244–1253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (1979). Affective space is bipolar.Journal of Personality and Social pscyhology, 37 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. M. (1986). The internal dialogue: On the assymmetry between positive and negative coping thoughts.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, G., & Osgood, C. (Eds.). (1969).The semantic differential technique. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., & Taylor, R. (1981). Induced mood and the accessibility of memories: An effect of mood states or mood inducation procedure?British Journal of Clinical psychology, 20 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velten, E. (1968). A laboratory task for the induction of mood states.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 6 437–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood.Psychological Bulletin, 98 219–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1965).Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Lubin, B. (1985).Manual for the Multiple Affect Adjective Checklist revised. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuykendall, D., Keating, J.P. & Wagaman, J. Assessing affective states: A new methodology for some old problems. Cogn Ther Res 12, 279–294 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176190

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176190

Key words

Navigation