Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of control in the temporary help service industry

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

As firms increasingly rely on temporary clerical workers, previous control mechanisms centered in the workplace no longer are sufficient to maintain labor discipline and ensure production quality and uniformity. Through participant observation of four temporary help service firms and two placement sites, this case study reveals forms of control that differ from those in place at more commonly studied manufacturing enterprises. Temporary help service firms have developed a dualistic form of control that operates on two levels: (1) a decentralized level, whereby the temporary help service firm indirectly controls workers; and (2) a bureaucratic level, whereby the temporary help service firm rationalizes jobs in the organization's hierarchy by delimiting a set of tasks, competencies, and responsibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Sheila andCarol Wolkowitz 1987 Homeworking: Myths and Realities. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, Eileen 1987 “Restructuring work: Temporary, part-time and at-home employment.” In Heidi Hartmann (ed.), Computer Chips and Paper Clips: 268–310. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Jane and Hazel Downing 1980 “Word processing and the transformation of the patriarchal relations of control in the office.” Capital and Class Spring: 64–99.

  • Beechey, Veronica andTeresa Perkins 1985 “Conceptualizing part-time work.” In Bryan Roberts, Ruth Finnegan, and Duncan Gallie (eds.), New Approaches to Economic Life: 246–263. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, Harry 1974 Labor and Monopoly Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael 1985 The Politics of Production. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Donald andRichard D. Leone 1976 Women Returning to Work and Their Interaction with a Temporary Help Service. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, Max andKim Hazelbaker 1986 “Employment growth in the temporary help industry.” Monthly Labor Review 109:37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Kathleen 1988 “Women's labor force attachment: Rise of contingent work.” In Department of Labor (ed.), Flexible Work Styles: 76–82. Washington DC: United States Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Kathleen andMary Murphree 1988 “Introduction.” In Department of Labor (ed.), Flexible Work Styles: 1–11. Washington DC: United States Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, Susan 1987 “The mobile work force.” High Flex Society Working Papers, Roosevelt Center for American Policy Studies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, David 1987 “‘Picking women’: The recruitment of temporary workers in the mail order industry.” Work, Employment and Society 3:371–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, Cynthia 1987 “Working women's consciousness: Traditional or oppositional.” In Carol Groneman and Mary Beth Norton (eds.), To Toil the Livelong Day: America's Women at Work, 1780–1980: 284–302. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Scott 1990 “Inserting gender into Burawoy's theory of the labor process.” Work, Employment and Society 4:391–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard 1979 Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Andrew 1977 Industry and Labour: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, Ann andRosemary Pringle 1984 Gender at Work. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974 “A profile of the temporary help industry and its workers.” Monthly Labor Review 95:44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1975 “The management of peripheral employees.” Personnel Journal 54:482–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “Preferences of temporary workers: Time, variety, and flexibility.” Monthly Labor Review 107:26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, Heidi andDavid Fasenfest 1984 “The role of gender in class formation: A case of female clerical workers.” Review of Radical Political Economics 16:89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Heidi andJune Lapidus 1989 “Temporary work.” Working Paper No. 29, Institute for Women's Policy Research, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Karl 1985 “Flexible working hours—How to match employees' preferences and enterprises interests.” Unpublished paper presented at the Conference on Critical Perspectives in Organizational Analysis, Baruch College.

  • Howe, Wayne 1986 “Temporary help workers: Who they are, what jobs they hold.” Monthly Labor Review 109:45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss 1977 Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangum, Gareth, Donald Mayall, andKristen Nelson 1985 “The temporary help industry: A response to the dual internal labor market.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38:599–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Anne 1988 “Temporary help is becoming a permanent solution.” In The Department of Labor (ed.), Flexible Work Styles: 50–53. Washington DC: United States Department of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • 9 to 5 National Association of Working Women 1986 “Working at the margins: Part-time and temporary workers in the U.S.” Cleveland, OH: 9 to 5, National Association of Working Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, Virginia andFrances Katsuranis 1978 “Urban nomads: Women in temporary clerical services.” In Ann Stromberg and Shirley Harkess (eds.), Women Working: 316–338. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, Michael 1986 “The disposable employee in becoming a fact of corporate life.” Business Week Dec. 15: 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pringle, Rosemary 1988 Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power and Work. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Paul 1989 The Nature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labor Process. New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaskovic-Devy, Donald and Barbara Risman 1989 “Organizational, managerial and employee constraints on the reorganization of work: The case of telecommuting.” Unpublished paper, North Carolina State.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gottfried, H. Mechanisms of control in the temporary help service industry. Sociol Forum 6, 699–713 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114408

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01114408

Key words

Navigation