Abstract
In clinical practice, decisions must be made about whether and how to convert to newer technologies. To address this issue, two separate studies were conducted. We evaluated the relationships between results of lumbar spine measurements using two dual photon absorptiometry (DPA1 and DPA2) instruments and one dual energy X-ray (DXA) instrument with the same subjects (49 volunteers), and also in 65 patients who were measured on the DPA1 and DXA machines. Second, we measured the lumbar spine and the proximal femur in three groups of 12 female volunteers three times on one instrument within 1 week. We purposely simulated a busy clinic setting with different technologists, older radioactive sources, and a heterogeneous patient group. The comparison study indicated a significant difference between the mean bone density values reported by the machines, but the results were highly correlated (R 2 = 0.89–0.96). The short-term precision errors (coefficients of variation) differed among the instruments, ranging from 1.3% (DXA of the spine) to 5.1% (DPA1 of the spine), and in the femoral neck, 2.3% and 2.4% (DXA and DPA1, respectively) versus 3.5% by DPA2. This study emphasizes the differences between instruments, the potential for greater error in busy clinic environments, and the apparent superiority of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry under these less than ideal conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borders J, Kerr E, Sartoris DJ, Stein JA, Ramos E, Moscona AA, Resnick D (1989) Quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: in vivo comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Radiology 170:129
Glüer CC, Steiger P, Genant HK (1988) Validity of dual-photon absorptiometry. Radiology 166:574
Glüer CC, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Elliesen-Kliefoth K, Hayashi C, Genant HK (1990) Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. Radiology 174:223
Gundry CR, Miller CW, Ramos E, Moscona A, Stein JA, Mazess RB, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1990) Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: clinical experience with two different systems. Radiology 174:539
Kelly TL, Slovik DM, Schoenfeld DA, Neer RM (1988) Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 67:839
Mazess RB, Barden HS (1989) Bone densitometry for diagnosis and monitoring osteoporosis. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 191:261
Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J (1989) Performance evaluation of a dual-energy X-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 44:228
Nilas I., Hassager C, Christiansen C (1988) Long-term precision of dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings. Bone Miner 3:305
O'Malley M, Kenrick AJ, Sartoris DJ, Hochberg AM, Weisman MH, Ramos E, Zvaifler N, Resnick D (1989) Axial bone density in rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of dual-energy projection radiography and dual-photon absorptiometry. Radiology 170:501
Pacifici R, Rupich R, Vered I, Fischer KC, Griffin M, Susman N, Avioli LV (1988) Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study. Calcif Tissue Int 43:189
Pindyck RS, Rubinfeld DL (1981) Econometric models and economic forecasts. McGraw-Hill, New York
Ross PD, Wasnich RD, Vogel JM (1988) Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age. Radiology 166:523
Sartoris DJ, Resnick D (1989) Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective. AJR 152:241
Shipp CC, Berger PS, Deehr MS, Dawson-Hughes B (1988) Precision of dual-photon absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 42:287
Valkema R, Verheij LF, Blokland JAK, Zwinderman AH, Bijvoet OLM, Papapoulos SE, Pauwels EKJ (1990) Limited precision of lumbar spine dual-photon absorptiometry by variations in the soft-tissue background. J Nucl Med 31:1774
Verheij LF, Blokland JAK, Papapoulos SE, Bijvoet OLM, Pauwels EKJ (1991) Automated comparison of dual-photon absorptiometric studies of the lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 6:575
Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Brown ML, Morin RL, Riggs BL (1988) Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin Proc 63:1075
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, D.A., Brown, E.B., Flynn, M.J. et al. Comparison of dual photon and dual energy X-ray bone densitometers in a clinic setting. Skeletal Radiol. 20, 591–595 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01106090
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01106090