Skip to main content
Log in

A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Occupational musculoskeletal disorders represent a major challenge to the injured worker, his or her family, the various health care, health and safety, and human resource professionals that work in this area as well as employers and the workers' compensation system. The epidemiology of the occupational musculoskeletal disorders and work disability indicate the problem is growing. Given the multiple factors that contribute to work disability and the complexity in the return to work process, the need to address the varied factors that contribute to work disability has become increasingly clear. Following a review of the magnitude of the problem, a conceptual framework that considers the multivariate nature of work disability is proposed as a heuristic for research and practice. Such an integrated approach argues for a broader consideration of work disability from a biomedical, biomechanical, and psychosocial framework. Last, this paper summarizes efforts to date in the areas of prevention, evaluation, and rehabilitation. The paper suggests that a number of factors have converged over the past 5–10 years that point to the need for a new approach to the problem of work disability, one that truly attempts to integrate the diverse groups and approaches of the past and seeks to develop new knowledge and strategies. It is expected that the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation will facilitate such an integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics.Occupational injuries and illnesses in the United States by industry, 1989: U.S. Department of Labor, Bulletin 2379. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.Proposed national strategy for the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries: DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 89-129. Washington, D.C., 1986.

  3. Hester EJ. Workers who become disabled. In: Scheer SJ, ed.Multidisciplinary perspectives in vocational assessment of impaired workers. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kraus LE, Stoddard S.Chartbook on disability in the United States: An Info Use Report. Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. LaPlante MP,Data on disability from the National Health Interview Survey, 1983–85. An Info Use Report. Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chaffin DB, Anderson G:Occupational biomechanics. New York: Wiley, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Putz-Anderson V, ed.Cumulative trauma disorders: A manual for musculoskeletal diseases of the upper limbs. London: Taylor and Francis, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders.Spine 1987; 12: 7S.

    Google Scholar 

  9. New York State Worker's Compensation Board.Compensated cases closed: 1981. Research and Statistics Bulletin No. 42, 1984.

  10. New York State Worker's Compensation Board.Compensated cases closed: 1988.

  11. Bureau of Labor Statistics.1988 Worker's compensation records. Supplemental data system Table 1-102. Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Labor, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Webster BS, Snook SH. The cost of compensable low back pain.J Occup Med 1990; 32: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spengler DM, Bigos SJ, Martin NA, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A. Back injuries in industry: A retrospective study: I. Overview and cost analysis.Spine 1986; 11: 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer T, Gatchel R, Mayer H, Kishino J, Keeley J, Mooney V. A prospective randomized two year study of functional restoration in industrial low back injury utilizing objective assessment.JAMA 1987; 258: 1763–1769.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feuerstein M, Papciak AS, Hoon PE. Biobehavioral mechanisms of chronic low back pain.Clin Psychol Rev 1987; 7: 243–273.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kelsey JL, Golden AL. Occupational and workplace factors associated with low back pain.Spine: State of the Art Rev 1987; 2: 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.A national strategy for occupational musculoskeletal injury prevention: Implementation issues and research needs. Conference held at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, April 8–9, 1991.

  18. U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.Ergonomics program management for meat packing plants: OSHA Publication No. 3123. Washington, D.C., 1990.

  19. Sauter SL, Dainoff MJ, Smith MJ, eds. Promoting health and productivity in the computerized office: Models of succesful ergonomic interventions. London: Taylor and Francis, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Snook SH. Approaches to the control of back pain in industry: Job design, job placement and education/training.Spine: State of the Art Rev 1987; 2: 45–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Isernhagen SJ Physical therapy in occupational rehabilitation.J. Occup Rehab 1991; 1: 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Isernhagen SJ ed.Work injury: Management and prevention. Rockville, Maryland: Aspen, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mayer T, Gatchel R.Functional restoration for spinal disorders: The sports medicine approach. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Lea and Febinger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saal JA. Intervertebral disc herniation: Advances innonoperative treatment.Phys Med Rehab: State of the Art Rev 1990; 4: 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ogden-Niemeyer L, Jacobs K, eds.Work hardening: State of the art. Thorofare, NJ: 1989.

  26. Committee on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities.Total number of accredited programs: May 3, 1991. Tuscon, Arizona, 1991.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feuerstein, M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. J Occup Rehab 1, 5–12 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073276

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073276

Key Words

Navigation