Skip to main content
Log in

Assortative mating in mice. II. Strain differences in female mating preference, male preference, and the question of possible sexual selection

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Females ofMus musculus domesticus from the inbred strains DBA/Ibg, C57BL/Ibg, C57BL/J, BALB/Ibg, and C3H/J were tested for mating preference choice between males from their own strain and males from another strain. A general consistency with previously reported results was found, in that the females preferred to associate and mate with males of the opposite strain. However, no preference was found in the case of two strains: BALB/Ibg and C3H/J. Also, C57BL/Ibg females, which generally displayed mating preference for the opposite strain, did not show any preference when allowed to choose between C57BL/Ibg and BALB/Ibg males. The possible effect of male differential attractiveness or sexual ability (sexual selection) on the determination of female mating preference is excluded since no strain of males had an advantage when “neutral” females from a heterogeneous strain were tested for mating preference. The male mating preference of the strains DBA/Ibg and BALB/Ibg was tested in a situation set up to reduce possible bias from the female's differential receptiveness. As in the previous experiment, the males did not seem to have any mating preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bastock, M. (1956). A gene mutation which changes a behavior pattern.Evolution 10: 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lill, A. (1968). An analysis of sexual isolation in the domestic fowl: 1. The basis of homogamy in males.Behaviour 30: 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainardi, D. (1964). Relations between early experience and sexual preference in female mice (a progress report).Atti Ass. Genet. Ital. 9: 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainardi, D., Marsan, M., and Pasquall, A. (1965). Assenza di preferenze sessuli tra ceppi nel maschio diMus musculus domesticus.Inst. Lombardo (Rend. Sc.) B99: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClearn, G. E., Wilson, J. R., and Meredith, W. (1970). The use of isogenic and heterogenic mouse stocks in behavioral research. In Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D. (eds.),Contributions to Behavior-Genetic Analysis: The Mouse as a Prototype, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, T. E. (1962). Sexual behavior in three inbred strains of mice.Behaviour 19: 341–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, A. H. (1915). Experiments on sex recognition inDrosophila.J. Anim. Behav. 5: 351–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanai, J., and McClearn, G. E. (1972). Assortative mating in mice. I. Female mating preference.Behav. Genet. 2: 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by NIGMS Grant GM-14547.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yanai, J., McClearn, G.E. Assortative mating in mice. II. Strain differences in female mating preference, male preference, and the question of possible sexual selection. Behav Genet 3, 65–74 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067690

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067690

Keywords

Navigation