Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of absolute bioavailability assuming steady state apparent volume of distribution remains constant

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The limitations of using estimates of extent of bioavailability (F) based on the assumption that either clearance (CL) or Varea remain, constant are discussed in relation to the situation where CL changes between doses. When estimates of F assume CL to remain constant, the entent of the error is the same for all drugs where the percentage change in CL is the same. Assuming Varea to remain constant, the error in F will vary between drugs for similar percentage changes in CL and is related to the extent to which the kinetics of the disposition process deviate from a one compartment body model. A noncompartmental method is described where, provided the reference dose is given intravenously, F can be estimated based on the assumption that Vss remains constant between doses. This method is more accurate than those based on the assumption that either CL or Varea remain, constant when CL changes between doses, but is subject to error when the terminal loglinear slope of Cp vs. time better reflects the process of absorption rather than elimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Riegelman, J. Loo, and M. Rowland. Concept of a volume of distribution and possible errors in evaluation of this parameter.J. Pharm. Sci. 57:128–133 (1968).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. R. A. Upton, J.-F. Thiercelin, T. W. Guentert, S. M. Wallace, J. R. Powell, L. Sanson, and S. Riegelman. Intraindividual variability in theophylline pharmacokinetics: statistical verification in 39 of 60 healthy young adults.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 10:123–134 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. Upton, J.-F. Thiercelin, J. K. Moore, and S. Riegeiman. A method of estimating within-individual variability in clearance and in volume of distribution from standard bioavailability studies.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 10:135–146 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wagneret al. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from intravenous data by uniform methods and some of their uses.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:161–182 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Riegelman and P. Collier. The application of statistical moment theory to the evaluation of in vivo dissolution time and absorption time.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 8:509–534 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Z. Benet and R. L. Galeazzi. Noncompartmental determination of the steady state volume of distribution.J. Pharm. Sci. 68:1071–1074 (1979).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. P. S. Collier. Some considerations on the estimation of steady state apparent volume of distribution and the relationships between volume terms.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 11:93–105 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased, April 4th, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collier, P.S., Riegelman, S. Estimation of absolute bioavailability assuming steady state apparent volume of distribution remains constant. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 11, 205–214 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061850

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061850

Key words

Navigation