Abstract
The limitations of using estimates of extent of bioavailability (F) based on the assumption that either clearance (CL) or Varea remain, constant are discussed in relation to the situation where CL changes between doses. When estimates of F assume CL to remain constant, the entent of the error is the same for all drugs where the percentage change in CL is the same. Assuming Varea to remain constant, the error in F will vary between drugs for similar percentage changes in CL and is related to the extent to which the kinetics of the disposition process deviate from a one compartment body model. A noncompartmental method is described where, provided the reference dose is given intravenously, F can be estimated based on the assumption that Vss remains constant between doses. This method is more accurate than those based on the assumption that either CL or Varea remain, constant when CL changes between doses, but is subject to error when the terminal loglinear slope of Cp vs. time better reflects the process of absorption rather than elimination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Riegelman, J. Loo, and M. Rowland. Concept of a volume of distribution and possible errors in evaluation of this parameter.J. Pharm. Sci. 57:128–133 (1968).
R. A. Upton, J.-F. Thiercelin, T. W. Guentert, S. M. Wallace, J. R. Powell, L. Sanson, and S. Riegelman. Intraindividual variability in theophylline pharmacokinetics: statistical verification in 39 of 60 healthy young adults.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 10:123–134 (1982).
R. A. Upton, J.-F. Thiercelin, J. K. Moore, and S. Riegeiman. A method of estimating within-individual variability in clearance and in volume of distribution from standard bioavailability studies.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 10:135–146 (1982).
Wagneret al. Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from intravenous data by uniform methods and some of their uses.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 5:161–182 (1977).
S. Riegelman and P. Collier. The application of statistical moment theory to the evaluation of in vivo dissolution time and absorption time.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 8:509–534 (1980).
L. Z. Benet and R. L. Galeazzi. Noncompartmental determination of the steady state volume of distribution.J. Pharm. Sci. 68:1071–1074 (1979).
P. S. Collier. Some considerations on the estimation of steady state apparent volume of distribution and the relationships between volume terms.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 11:93–105 (1983).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Deceased, April 4th, 1981.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collier, P.S., Riegelman, S. Estimation of absolute bioavailability assuming steady state apparent volume of distribution remains constant. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 11, 205–214 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061850
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01061850