Skip to main content
Log in

Disposition of sulfadimethoxine in swine: Inclusion of protein binding factors in a pharmacokinetic model

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sulfadimethoxine was administered intravenously and orally to five swine. More than 75% of the dose was excreted into urine as the acetyl metabolite with 4–6% excreted unchanged. Plasma and urine data were not consistent when a linear pharmacokinetic model was used to describe the data. Sulfadimethoxine has a high affinity for plasma protein, and the data were subsequently fitted to a nonlinear model, which included saturable protein binding. The choice of a nonlinear model was further supported by a minimum value for the Akaike information criteria. The protein binding constant obtained was 2.8× 104 M−1 and the total protein binding site concentration in plasma was 4.6×10−4 m. Both values are comparable with in vitrodata. This result suggests that the nonlinear model involving protein binding can be successfully applied to pharmacokinetic data. The apparent biological half-life of Sulfadimethoxine (free and bound) in plasma was 14 hr; however, the half-life of elimination of free drug was 1.25 hr. Following oral administration, all of the dose was absorbed with an apparent absorption half-life of 2.9 hr.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. W. A. Bourne. Drug residues in food animals.U.S. Pharmacist, 58–62 (1981).

  2. W. G. Huber. The public health hazards associated with the nonmedical and animal health usage of antimicrobial drugs.Pure Appl. Chem. 35:377–388 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. W. A. Bourne, R. F. Bevill, R. M. Sharma, R. P. Gural, and L. W. Dittert. Disposition of sulfonamides in food-producing animals: pharmacokinetics of sulfamethazine in lambs.Am. J. Vet. Res. 38:967–972 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. G. D. Koritz, R. F. Bevill, D. W. A. Bourne, and L. W. Dittert. Disposition of sulfonamides in food-producing animals: pharmacokinetics of sulfathiazole in swine.Am. J. Vet. Res. 39:481–484 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. R. F. Bevill, L. W. Dittert, and D. W. A. Bourne. Disposition of sulfonamides in food-producing animals. IV. Pharmacokinetics of sulfamethazine in cattle following administration of an intravenous dose and three oral dosage forms.J. Pharm. Sci. 66:619–623 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D. W. A. Bourne, M. Bialer, L. W. Dittert, M. Hayashi, G. Rudawsky, G. D. Koritz, and R. F. Bevill. Disposition of sulfadimethoxine in cattle: inclusion of protein binding factors in a pharmacokinetic model.J. Pharm. Sci. 70:1068–1072 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R. F. Bevill, R. M. Sharma, S. H. Meachum, S. C. Wozniak, D. W. A. Bourne, and L. W. Dittert. Disposition of sulfonamides in food-producing animals. Concentrations of sulfamethazine and its metabolites in plasma, urine, and tissues of lambs following intravenous administration.Am. J. Vet. Res. 38:973–977 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. H. G. Boxenbaum and S. A. Kaplan. Potential source of error in absorption rate calculations.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 3:257–264 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. K. Yamaoka, T. Nakagawa, and T. Uno. Application of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in the evaluation of linear pharmacokinetic equations.J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 6:165–175 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. C. M. Metzler, G. L. Elfring, and A. J. McEwen.A Users Manual for NONLIN and Associated Programs. Research Biostatistics, Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Mich. 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Genazzani and G. Pagnini. Binding capability of various sulfonamides to serum of different animal species.Am. J. Vet. Res. 24:1212–1216 (1963).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. J. G. Wagner.Fundamentals of Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Drug Intelligence Publications, Hamilton, Ill., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.-L. Hsu, J. K. H. Ma, H. W. Jun, and L. A. Luzzi. Structure relationship for binding of sulfonamides and penicillins to bovine serum albumin by fluorescence probe technique.J. Pharm. Sci. 63:27–31 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S. R. Walker. Influence of protein binding on the excretion of some sulfanilamidopyrimidines in man.J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 22:574–577 (1970).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. W. Von Scholtan. Die hydrophobe bindung der pharmaka an human albumin and ribonucleinsaure.Arzneim. Forsch. 18:505–517 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. S. Spector.Handbook of Biological Data, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by FDA contract 74–178. Presented at the APhA Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences 25th National Meeting, Hollywood, Fla, November 12–16, 1978.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bevill, R.F., Koritz, G.D., Rudawsky, G. et al. Disposition of sulfadimethoxine in swine: Inclusion of protein binding factors in a pharmacokinetic model. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics 10, 539–550 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059036

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059036

Key words

Navigation