Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Visual determinants of escape in tiger beetle larvae (Cicindelidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Larvae of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) are burrow-dwelling, visual ambush predators which withdraw into their burrows with the passing of large objects. Laboratory experiments confirmed that stimulation of each of the four principal stemmata can elicit escape and that the necessary visual stimulus is contracting, expanding, or transverse movement of a high-contrast image. Response frequency increases as a power function of contrast. Whole-field dimming is ineffective. Movement of large images composed of multiple texture elements, e.g., checkerboards, does not elicit escape, even if each element is much larger than the system's minimum visible angle (4–8° depending upon image contrast). In pilot experiments with a single figure before a textured background, coherent movement of the two inhibits escape, whereas motion in opposite directions does not. Thus, the processing mechanism functions as a feature detector and directs a response to large, single, moving objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bierbrodt, E. (1942). Der Larvenkopf vonPanorpa communis L. und seine Verwandlung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Gehirns und der Augen.Zool. Jhb. (Anat.) 68: 49–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg, V., and Taddei-Ferretti, C. (1966). The landing reaction ofMusca domestica induced by visual stimuli.Naturwissenschaften 53: 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggshall, J. (1972). The landing response and visual processing in the milkweed bug,Oncopeltus fasciatus. J. Exp. Biol.57: 401–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constantineau, M. (1930). Die Aufbau der Sehorgane bei den im Susswasser lebenden Dipterenlarven und bei Puppen und Imagines vonCulex.Zool. Jhb. (Anal.) 52: 251–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demoll, R., and Scheuring, L. (1912). Die Bedeutung der Ocellen der Insekten.Zool. Jhb. (allg. Zool.) 31: 519–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier, V. G. (1943). The dioptric apparatus of lateral ocelli. II. Visual capacities of the ocellus.J. Cell. Comp.Physiol. 22: 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faasch, H. (1968). Beobachtung zur Biologie und zum Verhalten vonCicindela hybrida undCicindela campestris und experimentelle Analyse ihres Beutefangverhaltens.Zool. Jhb. (Syst.) 95: 477–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, H. T. (1946). The reactions ofCulex larvae and pupae to gravity, light, and mechanical shock.Physiol. Zool. 19: 190–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friederichs, H. F. (1931). Beiträge zur Morphologie und Physiologie der Sehorgane der Cicindeliden (Coleoptera).Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 21: 1–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, R. M. (1974). The visually evoked defense reflex of the crayfish: Habituation, facilitation, and the influence of picrotoxin.J. Neurobiol. 5: 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. C. (1925). Studies on the morphology, taxonomy, and ecology of the larvae of holarctic tiger beetles (family Cicindelidae).Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 65(17): 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, C. (1915). Untersuchung über den Lichtsinn bei Echinodermen.Pflüger Arch. Physiol. 160: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hori, M. (1982). The biology and population dynamics of the tiger beetle,Cicindela japonica (Thunberg).Physiol. Ecol. Jpn. 19: 77–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundertmark, A. (1936). Helligkeits- und Farbenunterscheidungsvermögen der Eiraupe der Nonne(Lymantria monacha L.).Z. Vergl. Physiol. 24: 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundertmark, A. (1937). Das Formunterscheidungsvermögen der Eiraupe der Nonne (Lymantria monacha).Z. Vergl. Physiol. 24: 563–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, H. S. (1976).Behavior of Lower Organisms, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. H. (1976). Pattern detection and the two-dimensional Fourier transform: Flickering checkerboards and chromatic mechanisms.Vis. Res. 16: 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuster, J., and Evans, W. (1980). Visual fields of the compound eyes of four species of Cicindelidae (Coleoptera).Can. J. Zool. 58: 326–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1985a). The eye: Optics. In Kerkut, G. A., and Gilbert, L. E. (eds.),Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, Vol. 6, Pergammon, Oxford, pp. 225–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, M. F. (1985b). The morphology and optics of spider eyes. In Barth, F. G. (ed.),Neurobiology of Arachnids, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E. M. (1981). The capture efficiency of flickers preying on larval tiger beetles.Auk 98: 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H. (1971). Visuelle Schlüsselreize für die Auflösung der Beutefanghandlung beim Bachwasserläufer,Velia caprai (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). I. Untersuchung der räumlichen und zeitlichen Reizparameter mit formverschiedenen Attrappen.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 72: 260–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (1974). The structure and function of the larval eye of the sawflyPerga.J. Insect Physiol. 20: 1565–1591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. H. (1979). Intraocular filters. In Autrum, H. (ed.),Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VII/6A. Comparative Physiology and Evolution of Vision in Invertebrates. Invertebrate Photoreceptors, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 69–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. K. (1978). Growth rates and survivorship of tiger beetle larvae.Cicindela 10: 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. K. (1979). Rearing tiger beetles in the laboratory.Cicindela 11: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. K. (1982). Biology and behavior of two species ofAnthrax (Diptera: Bombyliidae), parasitoids of the larvae of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 75: 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, H. F. (1979). Eye structure and the monophyly of the Arthropoda. In Gupta, A. P. (ed.),Arthropod Phylogeny, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 299–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. L., and Knisley, C. B. (1985). Evidence for food as a limiting resource in the life cycle of tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae).Oikos 45: 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D. L., and Stemberger, S. (1980). Competition, body size, and the relative energy balance of adult tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae).Am. Midl. Nat. 104: 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, R. L. C. (1967). Some responses to light in a specimen ofPelagohydra mirabilis Dendy, 1902 (Coelenterata: Hydrozoa).J. Exp. Biol. 46: 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, W. (1975). Visual space perception. In Carterette, E. C., and Friedman, M. P. (eds.),Handbook of Perception, Vol. 5. Seeing, Academic Press, New York, pp. 351–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K. N., and Khattar, P. (1977). Orientation ofPapilio demoleus larvae in relation to size, distance, and combination pattern of visual stimuli.J. Insect Physiol. 23: 1421–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, W. (1965). Perception of impending collision: A study of visually directed avoidant behavior.Psychol. Monogr. 79: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöne, H. (1953). Farbhelligkeit und Farbunterscheidung bei den WasserkäfernDytiscus marginalis, Acilius sulcatus, and ihren Larven.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 35: 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, J. F. (1969).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W. H. (1944). Some problems of animal learning.Proc. Linn. Soc. (Lond.) 156: 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unteutsch, W. (1937). Über den Licht- und Schattenreflex des Regenwurms.Zool. Jhb. (allg. Zool.) 58: 69–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Buddenbrock, W. (1930). Untersuchungen über den Schattenreflex.Z. Vergl. Physiol. 13: 164–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheimer, G. (1972). Visual acuity and spatial modulation thresholds. In Jameson, D., and Hurvich, L. M. (eds.),Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. VII/4. Visual Psychophysics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 170–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, H. L. (1967). Bionomics and zoogeography of tiger beetles of saline habitats in the central United States (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae).Univ. Kam. Sci. Bull. 47: 145–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., and Farish, D. J. (1973). Predatory behavior in the antlike waspMethoca stygia (Say) (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae).Anim. Behav. 21: 292–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, K., and Toh, Y. (1975). The fine structure of the lateral ocellus of the dobsonfly larva.J. Morphol. 146: 415–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes, A. W. (1906). Modifiability of behavior inHydroides dianthus V.J. Comp. Neurol. Psychol. 16: 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zikan, J. J. (1929). Zur Biologie der Cicindeliden Brasiliens.Zool. Anz. 82: 269–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Cole Gilbert

    Present address: Department of Visual Sciences, School of Optometry, Indiana University, 47405, Bloomington, Indiana

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, 66045, Lawrence, Kansas

    Cole Gilbert

Authors
  1. Cole Gilbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, C. Visual determinants of escape in tiger beetle larvae (Cicindelidae). J Insect Behav 2, 557–574 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053354

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053354

Key words

Search

Navigation