References
Aldrich, J. R., Oliver, J. E., Lusby, W. R., Kochansky, J. P., and Lockwood, J. A. (1987). Pheromone strains of the cosmopolitan pest,Nezara viridula (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae).J. Exp. Zool. 244: 171–176.
Bradbury, J. W., and Davies, N. B. (1987). Roles of intra- and intersexual selection. In Bradbury, J. W., and Andersson, M. B. (eds.),Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives, John Wiley, New York, pp. 143–164.
Hamilton, W. D., and Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites?Science 218: 384–387.
Harris, V. E., and Todd, J. W. (1980). Temporal and numeric patterns of reproductive behavior in the southern green stink bug,Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 27: 105–116.
Harris, V. E., Todd, J. W., Webb, J. C., and Benner, J. C. (1982). Acoustical and behavioral analysis of the songs of the southern green stink bug,Nezara viridula. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.75: 234–249.
Heisler, I. L. (1984). Quantitative genetic model for the evolution of mating preferences.Evolution 38: 1283–1295.
Heisler, I. L., and Curtsinger, J. W. (1990). Dynamics of sexual selection in diploid populations.Evolution 44: 1164–1176.
Kasule, F. K. (1986). Repetitive mating and female fitness inDysdercus cardinalis (Hemiptera: Pyrrhocoridae).Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 88: 191–199.
Kirkpatrick, M. (1985). Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: The demise of the “sexy son.”Am. Nat. 125: 788–810.
Knoppien, P. (1984). The rare male mating advantage: An artifact caused by marking procedures?Am. Nat. 123: 862–866.
Lande, R. (1980a). Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters.Evolution 34: 292–307.
Lande, R. (1980b). Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation.Am. Nat. 116: 463–479.
Maynard Smith, J. (1991). Theories of sexual selection.TREE 6: 146–151.
McLain, D. K. (1980). Female choice and the adaptive significance of prolonged copulation inNezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Psyche 87: 325–336.
McLain, D. K. (1985). Male size, sperm competition and the intensity of sexual selection in the southern green stink bug,Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78: 86–89.
McLain, D. K. (1988). Male mating preferences and assortative mating in the soldier beetle.Evolution 42: 729–735.
McLain, D. K. (1991). Heritability of size: A positive correlate of multiple fitness components in the southern green stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 84: 174–178.
McLain, D. K., and Marsh, N. B. (1990). Male copulatory success: heritability and relationship to mate fecundity in the southern green stinkbug,Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Heredity 64: 161–167.
McLain, D. K., Lanier, D. L., and Marsh, N. B. (1990). Effects of female size, mate size, and number of copulations on fecundity, fertility, and longevity ofNezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 83: 1130–1136.
Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects.Biol. Rev. 45: 525–567.
Philippi, T., and Seger, J. (1989). Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited.TREE 4: 41–44.
Spiess, E. B. (1987). Discrimination amongst perspective mates inDrosophila. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, John Wiley, New York, pp. 75–120.
Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Todd, J. W. (1989). Ecology and behavior ofNezara viridula.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 273–292.
Trivers, R. L. (1985).Social Evolution, Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.
Weinshall, D., and Eshel, I. (1987). On the evolution of an optimal rate of sexual reproduction.Am. Nat. 130: 758–774.
Wilkinson, L. (1987).Systat: The System for Statistics, Systat Inc., Evanston, IL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McLain, D.K. Preference for polyandry in female stink bugs,Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J Insect Behav 5, 403–410 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049848
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049848