Skip to main content
Log in

Egg attendance and brooding by males of the giant water bugLethocerus medius (Guerin) in the field (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males of the giant water bug Lethocerus medius(Guerin) typify their monobasic subfamily, the Lethocerinae, in that they do not brood eggs attached to their backs as do males of all members of the subfamily Belostomatinae. Exclusive male parental investment as expressed in the Belostomatinae is extremely rare behavior among animals, and evolution of the trait is obscure. Lethocerus mediusmales apparently remain with their mates through oviposition and are consistently found in attendance of eggs after the female has departed. This behavior may enhance paternity assurance at no cost in opportunity for polygyny. Two double clutches of eggs were found, from which we infer the potential for polygynous matings and shared parental investment. Male L. mediusbrood attended egg clutches above the surface of the water, where they may moisten them, shade them, and defend them against predation. Egg attendance/brooding by L. mediusand other Lethocerusspecies may represent a plesiomorphic state from which paternal back- brooding evolved in the Belostomatinae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Böttger, K. (1974). Zur Biologie vonSphaerodema grassei ghesquierei.Arch. Hydrobiol. 74: 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, A. N. (1955). In quest of the spadefoots.New Mex. Q. 4: 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman, W. Y. (1969). An analysis of density effects and predation inBufo americanus tadpoles.Ecology 50: 632–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobben, R. H. (1968).Evolutionary Trends in Heteroptera, Part I. Eggs, Architecture of the Shell, Gross Embryology and Eclosion, Cent. Agr. Publ. Doc. Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, M. J. (1969). The biology of the giant water bugs (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae) in Trinidad.Proc. R. Entomol. Soc. Lond. A 44: 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Carlo, J. M. (1962). Consideraciones sobre la biologia deLethocerus mazzai De Carlo (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).Physis 23: 143–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. E. (1924). Biological notes onLethocerus americanus.Psyche 31: 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer, R. W., and Belin, M. S. (1973). Ecological notes on five sympatricLeptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae) from Equador.Herpetologica. 29: 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer, R. W., McDiarmid, R. W., and Weigmann, D. L. (1975). Tadpoles, predation, and pond habits in the tropics.Biotropica 7: 100–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford, H. B. (1925). Notes on the giant water bugs.Psyche 32: 88–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, N. (1988). Male brooding behavior of the giant water bugLethocerus deyrollei Vuillefroy (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Ethol. 6: 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, N. (1989a). Repeated copulations benefit of (sic) female inLethocerus deyrollei Vuillefroy (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Ethol. 7: 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, N. (1989b). Breeding strategy of the male brooding water bug,Diplonychus major Esaki (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae): Is back space limiting?J. Ethol. 7: 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, N. (1990). Egg mass destroying behavior of the female giant water bugLethocerus deyrollei Vuillefroy (Heteroptera: Belostomatidea).J. Ethol. 8: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jawale, S. M., and Ranade, D. R. (1988). Observations on the parental care inSphaerodema (=Diplonychus) rusticum Fabr.Geobios 15: 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelke, J. P. (1981). Morphological and biological studies on Belostomatidae Heteroptera with reference to the Central American speciesBelostoma ellipticum andBelostoma thomasi.Ento mol. Abh. (Dres.) 44: 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, W. F. (1989a). Surface wave communication during courtship in the giant water bug,Abedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 316–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, W. F. (1989b). Is male back space limiting? An investigation into the reproductive demography of the giant water bug,Abedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Insect. Behav. 2: 623–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, W. F., Gonzales, M. J., and Vehrencamp, S. L. (1989). Egg development and an evaluation of some of the costs and benefits of paternal care in the belostomatidAbedus indentatus (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 548–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, K. C. (1990). Male backspace availability in the giant water bug (Belostoma flumineum Say),Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 281–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauck, D. R., and Menke, A. S. (1961). The higher classification of the Belostomatidae (Hemiptera).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 54: 664–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahner, M. (1992).Systema Cryptoceratorum Phylogeneticum, Ein phylogenetisches System der Wasserwanzen (Hemiptera-Heteroptera), Ph.D. dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1977). Parental Investment: A prospective analysis.Anim. Behav. 25: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke, A. S. (1979a). Introduction. In Menke, A. S. (ed.),The Semiaquatic and Aquatic Hemiptera of California (Heteroptera: Hemiptera), Bulletin California Insect Survey, Vol. 21, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menke, A. S. (1979b). Family Belostomatidae—giant water bugs, electric light bugs, toe biters. In Menke, A. S. (ed.),The Semiaquatic and Aquatic Hemiptera of California (Heteroptera: Hemiptera), Bull. Calif. Insect Surv., Vol. 21, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, L. V. (1981).Developmental Polymorphism in the Tadpoles of the Spadefoot Toad Scaphiopus multiplicatus, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Riverside.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popov, Y. A. (1971). Historical Development of the Hemipterous Infraorder Nepomorpha.Tr. Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 129: 1–228 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, K. P. (1935). Life history ofLethocerus americanus (Leidy) (Hemiptera-Belostomatidae).Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 22: 479–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1978). Paternal care.Anim. Behav. 26: 904–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, F. W. (1899). The egg-carrying habit toZaitha.Am. Nat. 33: 931–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1975).Bionomics and Behavior of Abedus herbertiwith Comparative Observations on Belostoma flumineumand Lethocerus medius (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae), Ph.D., dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1976a). Brooding behavior of a male water bugBelostoma flumineum (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 49: 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1976b). Male brooding behavior of the water bugAbedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69: 740–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1979a). Paternity assurance and altered roles in the mating behavior of a giant water bugAbedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae).Anim. Behav. 27: 716–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1979b). Repeated copulation and sperm precedence: Paternity assurance for a male brooding water bug.Science 205: 1029–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. L. (1980). Evolution of exclusive postcopulatory paternal care in the insects.Fla. Entomol. 63: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik, M. F. S. (1969). The life history of the giant water bugLethocerus niloticus Stael (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).Bull. Soc. Entomol. Egypte. 53: 299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre Bueno, J. R. de la (1906). Life histories of North American water bugs. I. Life history ofBelostoma fluminea Say.Can. Entomol. 38: 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In. Campbell, B. G. (ed.)Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, P. (1983). Male brooding behavior ofDiplonychus indicus Venk. & Rao (Hemiptera: Belostomatidae).J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 56: 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voelker, J. (1966). Wasserwanzen als obligatorische Schneckenfresser im Nildelta (Limnogeton fiebert Mayr).Z. Tropenmed. Parasitol. 17: 155–165.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voelker, J. (1968). Untersuchungen zu Ernährung, Fortpflanzungsbiologie und Entwicklung vonLimnogeton fieberi Mayr (Belostomatidae, Hemiptera) als Beitrag zur Kenntnis von natürlichen Feinden tropischer Süsswasserschnecken.Entomol. Mitt. Zool. Staatsinst. Zool. Mus. Hamburg 3: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger, J. F. (1979). The evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals in Marler, P., and Vandenbergh, J. (eds.),Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology. Social Behavior and Communication, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 3, pp. 271–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, X. (1992). Uncertainty of paternity can select against paternal care.Am. Nat. 139: 1126–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, D. W., and Smith, R. L. (1985). Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods.Am. Zool. 25: 785–805.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, R.L., Larsen, E. Egg attendance and brooding by males of the giant water bugLethocerus medius (Guerin) in the field (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). J Insect Behav 6, 93–106 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049150

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01049150

Key words

Navigation