Abstract
Little information has been available on the frequency of police interrogation and rights waiver in juvenile cases. Research in developmental psychology suggests that the cognitive and emotional characteristics of juveniles, coupled with the circumstances inherent in police interrogations might render very infrequent the assertion of the right to silence by juveniles. Furthermore, both legal and social science commentators have suggested that an increase in certain due process protections (e.g., presence of parents at questioning) might not mitigate the forementioned effect. To test these assumptions, the study examined juvenile court records for a random sample of felony referrals over a three-year period (491 juveniles, 707 referrals). Police questioning occurred in 65–75% of felony referrals, and juveniles in about 90% of these referrals provided police with information (more than personal identification). These results were examined in relation to demographic and offense variables. Due process protections were significantly more frequent during one year than during a previous year, but there was no difference between years in the frequency of rights waiver. The implications of these findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop, B., & Beckman, L. Developmental conformity.Developmental Psychology 1971,5, 536.
Cicourel, A.The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice., New York: Wiley, 1968.
Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann. §22-2-2 (3) (c) (Supp. 1971).
Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. §17-66 (a) (Supp. 1973).
Costanza, P., & Shaw, M. Conformity as a function of age levelChild Development, 1966,37, 967–975.
Daniels v. State, 226, Ga. 269, 174 S.E. 2d 422 (1970).
Denney, D. Reflection and impulsivity as determinants of conceptual strategy.Child Development, 1973,44, 614–623.
Driver, E. Confessions and the social psychology of coercion.Harvard Law Review, 1968,82, 42–61.
Freeman v. Wilcox, 119 Ga. App. 325, 167 S.E. 2d 163 (1969).
Gomolak, N.G. Juvenile Investigative Procedures and Interviewing and Interrogating Juveniles. Columbia, Missouri: Missouri Law Enforcement Assistance Council. Informational pamphlet, November–December, 1973.
Gomolak, N. G. Missouri Police Juvenile Officer's Manual Guide. Columbia, Missouri: Missouri Council of Criminal Justice, 1975.
Grambs, J. The self-concept: basis for re-education of Negro youth. In W. Kvaraceus (Ed.),Negro selfconcept: implications for school and citizenship. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964, pp. 11–34.
Greenburger, E., O'Connor, J., & Sorensen, A. Personality, cognitive, and academic correlates of problemsolving flexibility.Developmental Psychology, 1971,4, 416–424.
In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 55 (1967).
In re K. W. B., 500 S. W. 2d (Mo. App. 1973).
Inbau, F., & Reid, J.Criminal Interrogation and Confessions. Baltimore.: Williams and Wilkins, 1967.
Interrogations in New Haven: The impact of Miranda.Yale Law Journal 1967,76, 1519–1648.
Kardiner, A., & Ovesey, L.The Mark of Oppression. New York: World, 1962.
Katz, I. Negro performance in interracial situations. In P. Watson (Ed.),Psychology and Race. Chicago: Aldine, 1973 pp. 256–266.
Keith-Speigel, P. Children's rights as participants in research. In G.P. Koocher (Ed.),Children's Rights and the Mental Health Professions. New York: John Wiley, 1976, pp. 53–81.
Lewis v. State, 259 Ind. App. 431, 288 N.E. 2d 138 (1972).
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
National Juvenile Law Center.Law and Tactics in Juvenile Cases. St. Louis, Missouri: NJLC, 1977 (3rd ed.).
N.M. Stat. Ann. § 13-14-25 (A) (Supp. 1973).
Okla. Stat. Ann. Lit. 10, §1109 (a) (Supp. 1973).
Palermo, D. Racial comparisons and additional normative data, on the Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale.Child Development, 1959,30, 53–57.
Patel, A., & Gordon, J. Some personal and situational determinants of yielding to influence.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960,61, 411–418.
People v. Lara, 432 P. 2d 202 (1967).
People v. Wolff, 179 N.W. 2d 206 (Mich. App. 1970).
Platt, A.The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
Rosenheim, M.Justice for the Child: Juvenile Court in Transition. New York: Free Press, 1962.
Rosenheim, M. (Ed.)Pursuing Justice for the Child. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
Rules of Practice and Procedure in Juvenile Courts.Journal of the Missouri Bar, 1976,32, 1-A (special issue).
Schultz, J. The cycle of juvenile court history.Crime and Delinquency, 1973,19, 457–476.
Schur, E.Radical Nonintervention: Rethinking the Delinquency Problem. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Seeburger, R., & Wettick, R. Miranda in Pittsburgh: A statistical study.University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 1967,29, 1–26.
State v. Arbeiter, 408 S.E. 2d 26 (Mo. 1966).
State v. Wade, 531 S.W. 2d 726 (1976).
State v. White, 494 S.W. 2d 687 (Mo. App. 1973).
Tapp, J., & Kohlberg, L. Developing senses of law and legal justice.Journal of Social Issues, 1971,27, 65–91.
Tapp, J., & Levine, F. Legal socialization: strategies for an ethical legality.Stanford Law Review, 1974,27, 1–72.
Torney, J. Socialization of attitudes toward the legal system.Journal of Social Issues, 1971,27, 137–154.
Wechsler, D.The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1955.
Werner, H.Comparative Psychology of Mental Development. Chicago: Follett, 1948.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by research grant MH-27849 from the Center for Studies of Crime and Delinquency, National Institute of Mental Health. The St. Louis County Juvenile Court is gratefully acknowledged for its cooperation in this study. Opinions and conclusions expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect those of either the grant agency or the St. Louis County Juvenile Court. In addition, Linda Vierling, Rebort Neems, and Ronald Peal are acknowledged for their assistance in data collection and analysis.
About this article
Cite this article
Grisso, J.T., Pomicter, C. Interrogation of juveniles. Law Hum Behav 1, 321–342 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048593
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048593