Abstract
The mission and goals of the juvenile court have not changed significantly during the more than 120 years since the first juvenile court was created. The mission and focus of the juvenile courts continue to be on parens patriae, that is, the court is considered a parent substitute for those children in trouble and in need of guidance and service. The jurisdiction of the juvenile court continues to include children “at fault,” those who violate the criminal law, and those who commit acts that are violations of laws that apply only to children and children who are not “at fault,” referred to as endangered children, who are in need of the court’s guidance and assistance. There have been significant changes in the procedures followed in the processing of youth in the courts. In addition, juveniles charged with delinquent offenses are now guaranteed most of the same due process rights as adults charged with criminal offenses. These include the right to be represented by an attorney, to remain silent, and to cross-examine witnesses.
A large percentage of the youth who have come to the attention of the police and other agencies, such as the school, by committing either delinquent or status offenses are totally diverted away from juvenile court processing. Approximately one-half of all of the juveniles referred to the juvenile courts in the United States are partially diverted, that is, the juveniles are informally (non-judicially) processed. These partially diverted youths are supervised and given guidance in programs operated by community agencies or juvenile courts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Black, H. E. (1991). Black’s law dictionary (6th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
Hockenberry, S. & Puzzanchera, C. (2018). Juvenile court statistics 2016. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
Kratcoski, P. (2012). Juvenile justice administration. Baca Raton, FL: CRC Press: Taylor & Francis Group.
Kratcoski, P., Kratcoski, L., Kratcoski, P. (2020). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, research, and the juvenile justice process. Cham, Switzerland, Springer
Sanborn, J. & Salerno, A. (2003). The juvenile justice system The. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing
Sickmund, M. & Puzzanchera. C. (2014). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2014 national report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
Snyder, H. & Sickmund, M., (2008). Juvenile offenders and victims: 2009 national report. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
Stark County Family Court (2010) Annual Report, 2010. Retrieved from https://www.familycourt.co.stark.oh.us.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kratcoski, P.C. (2023). Juvenile Court Administration: Diversion and Informal Processing. In: Juvenile Justice Administration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19515-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19515-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19514-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19515-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)