Abstract
This study examined the relation between decoding ability and quality of dyadic interaction of college roommate pairs. It was found that pairs with members who were both high in decoding (HH pairs) rated their interactions somewhat more positively than pairs in which one or both roommates were low (HL and LL pairs). This effect was more pronounced for ratings reflecting emotional sharing (e.g., gave and received support) than for ratings reflecting influence (e.g., initiated the interaction). For emotional sharing only, the difference between the HH pairs and the HL plus LL pairs was significant. The relative advantage of the HH pairs in emotional sharing and relative disadvantage in influence was more pronounced for males and less for females, suggesting a reversal of traditional sex-role behavior. When differences in decoding ability within roommate pairs were considered, the results showed that, in dyads with at least one good decoder (HH and HL pairs), the interaction was rated more positively by the roommate who was lower in decoding ability. The concept and measure of decoding ability and their implications for interaction and sex-role behavior were discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, J.W. (1981). Studying personality in the context of an advanced motivational psychology.American Psychologist, 36, 117–128.
Brauer, D.V., & DePaulo, B.M. (1980). Similarities between friends in their understanding of nonverbal cues.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 64–68.
Buck, R. (1983). Nonverbal receiving ability. In J.M. Wieman & R.P. Harrison (Eds.),Nonverbal interaction. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Burgoon, J.K., Buller, D.B., & Woodall, W.G. (1989).Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue. New York: Harper.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983).Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 225–245.
DiMatteo, M.R., Friedman, H.S., & Taranta, A. (1979). Sensitivity to bodily nonverbal communication as a factor in practitioner-patient rapport.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4, 18–26.
Firth, E.A., Conger, J.C., Kuhlenschmidt, S., & Dorcey, T. (1986). social competence and social perceptivity.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 85–100.
Funder, D.C., & Harris, M. (1986). On the several facets of personality assessment: The case of social acuity.Journal of Personality, 54, 528–550.
Hall, J.A. (1984).Nonverbal sex differences. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kenny, D.A. (1988). The analysis of data from two-person relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.),Handbook of interpersonal relations. London: Wiley.
Kombos, N.A., & Fournet, G.P. (1985). Effects of dominance-submissiveness and gender on recognition of nonverbal emotional cues.Educational and Psychological Research, 5, 19–28.
Monfries, M.M., & Kafer, N.F. (1987). Neglected and rejected children: A social-skills model.The Journal of Psychology, 121, 401–407.
Noller, P. (1980). Misunderstandings in marital communication: A study of couples' nonverbal communication.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1135–1148.
Noller, P. (1981). Gender and marital adjustment level differences in decoding messages from spouses and strangers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 272–278.
Rosenthal, R. (Ed.). (1979).Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., DiMatteo, M.R., Rogers, P.L., & Archer, D. (1979).Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1984).Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1982). A single, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.
Sabatelli, R.M., Buck, R., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). A social relations analysis of nonverbal communication accuracy in married couples.Journal of Personality, 54, 513–527.
Schneider, J., & Schneider Dücker, M. (1984). Sex roles and nonverbal sensitivity.The Journal of Social Psychology, 122, 281–282.
Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.L. (1978).Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Wheeler, L. & Nezlek, J. (1977). Sex differences in social participation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 742–754.
Wheeler, L., Reis, H., & Nezlek, J. (1983). Loneliness, social interaction, and sex roles.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 943–953.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NIMH Grant # R01 MH 40498 to Miron Zuckerman.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodgins, H.S., Zuckerman, M. The effect of nonverbal sensitivity on social interaction. J Nonverbal Behav 14, 155–170 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996224
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00996224